97 lines
5.1 KiB
Markdown
97 lines
5.1 KiB
Markdown
---
|
||
title: "Datengarten 39"
|
||
subtitle: "Cubesat Projekt GLORIA"
|
||
date: 2012-03-01T00:00:00+02:00
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
GLORIA PILOT MISSION PROPOSAL
|
||
-----------------------------
|
||
|
||
Introduction
|
||
------------
|
||
|
||
Recently Cubesats have attracted a considerable amount of attention as a
|
||
Spaceborne platformamong agencies interested in executing a short
|
||
duration mission mission. The Cubesats are standardcomponents available
|
||
off-the-shelf, and are relatively simple platform in the sense, that
|
||
they offerless overall control over the device. Nonetheless, a number of
|
||
scientific and engineering objectives have been achieved using
|
||
Cubesats,e.g. Ionospheric ELF measurements, and Reaction Wheel tests.
|
||
Cubesats are cubic platforms measuring 10cm x 10cm x 10cm, that is 1
|
||
liter. The maximum mass is1.33 kg, per unit. At the maximum 3 units can
|
||
be used together. Standard power and communication kits come together
|
||
with cubesats.
|
||
|
||
Mission Proposal: Aerosol Monitoring Aerosols are particulate matter in
|
||
the atmosphere, which are known to be influential on climate. Aerosols
|
||
are also to be monitored to observe the spread of natural calamities
|
||
such as Nuclear Disasters and Volcanic Disasters. The Present A-train
|
||
(the remote sensing satellite constellation that passes the equator at
|
||
local timeafternoon, figure 1) monitors atmospheric aerosol using
|
||
backscattered solar radiation, and spectrometric techniques.
|
||
Nonetheless, the monitoring process is not exclusively dedicated to
|
||
aerosols, even though aerosolsare an important player in the Earth
|
||
System. In fact the first exclusive mission after aerosols was the GLORY
|
||
mission from NASA, which did not quite succeed. There exists agencies,
|
||
who are interested in aerosol information. Climate studies recently have
|
||
inclined towards investigation of aerosol processes, for example, see
|
||
\[2\], \[3\] and \[5\]. Disastermitigation agencies also are interested
|
||
in aerosol data, for example see \[4\], \[6\]Mission Operation:
|
||
Photographic systems - The proposed method for aerosol monitoring
|
||
depends on photographic techniques. A syntheticaperture stereo camera
|
||
will photograph the atmosphere using different (commercially available)
|
||
bandpass filters. Another camera will be fitted with a spectrometer
|
||
polarimeter assembly. Multiband monitoring of the following parameters
|
||
will be of interest:
|
||
|
||
1. Spectral Pattern of the backscatter, analyzed in spectrometer assembly the includingpower at different wavelengths;
|
||
2. Atmospheric interference and backscatter patterns;
|
||
3. Polarization of backscatter;
|
||
4. Photometric descriptions of aerosol concentration patterns;
|
||
|
||
Mission Extension: Upper atmospheric Aerosol - The pilot mission is
|
||
engaged in monitoring the lower atmospheric aerosols (up to tropopause.
|
||
Should the Pilot mission is executed successfully, a possible extension
|
||
may be achieved with new devices inserted in orbit to monitor upper
|
||
atmospheric aerosols.
|
||
|
||
Further, a LIDAR based observation of aerosol dispersion may be
|
||
realized.Mission Goals: Science Return - The mission should return the
|
||
following science objectives successfully:
|
||
|
||
1. Identification of spectral signature of different aerosol species, at different altitudes,incidence angle, and environment (temperature etc);
|
||
2. Identification of patterns in the aerosol formations;
|
||
3. Identification of energy redistribution pattern at the presence of aerosols, anddifferentiations of patterns with respect to different aerosol species, and environmentalconditions; Mission Goals: Technical Goals - The technical goals include improvisation of sampling and monitoring techniques. The ones that are of primary interest are:
|
||
1. Noise filtration of aerosol monitoring data;
|
||
2. Optimal sampling point identification;
|
||
|
||
Mission Goals: Engineering Goals
|
||
|
||
1. Calibration of instruments;
|
||
2. Identifying the orbital maneuvers before launch;
|
||
3. Identifying necessary subsystems;
|
||
4. Designing and constructing the mission Control;
|
||
5. Construction of a Cubesat by integrating all subsystems necessary;
|
||
6. Launch of the said Cubesat;
|
||
7. Confirmed Orbital Operation of the said Cubesat for at least 6 months;
|
||
|
||
Mission Goals: Commercial Goals
|
||
|
||
1. Generation of data utilizable in the context of use by third parties;
|
||
2. Filtering of the data to meet the industry standards;
|
||
3. Generation of secondary data, to meet the requirement of secondary third parties;
|
||
|
||
Conclusion - The pilot mission focuses on simplicity and feasibility of
|
||
the mission, while making sure that somescientific data is returned –
|
||
such that the mission is not just a demonstrator. Only one
|
||
scientificpayload is planned.Given the pilot mission is successful, an
|
||
extension is possible, using more satellites, and moresophisticated
|
||
systems.Given the pilot mission is approved, and enough interest is
|
||
generated, immediately shall a MissionConcept Review be released,
|
||
wherein the science goals will be clearly defined. Immediately afterthe
|
||
MCR will follow a System Requirement Review, wherein the mission
|
||
requirements such as,data download rate, orbital height, etc will be
|
||
unambiguously defined.
|
||
|
||
More Infos can be found at [1](http://events.ccc.de/camp/2011/wiki/CubeSat_Workshop) and some previous test launch[2](http://universeexplorer.cwahi.net/project-nepa/#intro)
|