remove old theme, first post
This commit is contained in:
parent
1264cfd404
commit
cec95952d2
|
@ -1,7 +0,0 @@
|
|||
+++
|
||||
date = '2025-04-06T12:24:08+02:00'
|
||||
draft = true
|
||||
title = 'Hello World'
|
||||
+++
|
||||
|
||||
# this is a test
|
113
content/posts/why-i-do-not-use-flake-utils.md
Normal file
113
content/posts/why-i-do-not-use-flake-utils.md
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
|
|||
+++
|
||||
date = '2025-04-06T14:49:03+02:00'
|
||||
draft = false
|
||||
title = 'Why I do not use flake-utils'
|
||||
tags = ['nix']
|
||||
+++
|
||||
|
||||
I have been using [Nix] for a while now. Around a year ago, I switched everything from the [servicepoint] library to my [machine configuration] over to flakes.
|
||||
|
||||
For me the biggest advantage flakes bring is not additional functionality. Instead, they are an easier and semi-standardized way to do what you could before.
|
||||
|
||||
When learning flakes, you often see [flake-utils] being used. With it, you can shorten your flakes by not having to specify everything per system.
|
||||
|
||||
### Without anything
|
||||
|
||||
```nix
|
||||
{
|
||||
description = "Flake utils demo - without flakes";
|
||||
|
||||
outputs = { self, nixpkgs, flake-utils }:
|
||||
{
|
||||
packages."x86_64-linux" = rec {
|
||||
hello = pkgs.hello;
|
||||
default = hello;
|
||||
}
|
||||
packages."aarch64-linux" = rec {
|
||||
hello = pkgs.hello;
|
||||
default = hello;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
# more systems ...
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### With flake-utils
|
||||
|
||||
```nix
|
||||
{
|
||||
description = "Flake utils demo";
|
||||
|
||||
inputs.flake-utils.url = "github:numtide/flake-utils";
|
||||
|
||||
outputs = { self, nixpkgs, flake-utils }:
|
||||
flake-utils.lib.eachDefaultSystem (system:
|
||||
let pkgs = nixpkgs.legacyPackages.${system}; in
|
||||
{
|
||||
packages = rec {
|
||||
hello = pkgs.hello;
|
||||
default = hello;
|
||||
};
|
||||
}
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### With function in flake
|
||||
|
||||
To make a long story short, here is what I usually do instead:
|
||||
|
||||
```nix
|
||||
{
|
||||
description = "forAllSystems demo";
|
||||
|
||||
outputs = { self, nixpkgs }:
|
||||
let
|
||||
supported-systems = [ # [1]
|
||||
"x86_64-linux"
|
||||
"aarch64-linux"
|
||||
];
|
||||
forAllSystems =
|
||||
f:
|
||||
nixpkgs.lib.genAttrs supported-systems /* [2] */ (
|
||||
system:
|
||||
f rec {
|
||||
pkgs = nixpkgs.legacyPackages.${system}; # [3]
|
||||
inherit system;
|
||||
}
|
||||
);
|
||||
in
|
||||
{
|
||||
packages = forAllSystems ({ pkgs, ... }: rec {
|
||||
hello = pkgs.hello;
|
||||
default = default;
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
That’s definitely more code! - Yes, but it also includes more information in the flake, while getting rid of an external dependency.
|
||||
While more code can be intimidating for beginners, it actually helps remove a barrier to understanding how the flake works in this case.
|
||||
For me, it wasn’t a problem to ignore boilerplate like this at first, slowly learning more language features until I finally understood everything.
|
||||
|
||||
At **[1]**, the supported systems are specified. I personally use `x86_64-linux` and `aarch64-linux`, but I also usually support `x86_64-darwin` and `aarch64-darwin` in public projects.
|
||||
If you want to support any system, you can use [`nixpkgs.lib.system.flake-exposed`] at **[2]** instead of defining your own list.
|
||||
|
||||
Because the definition is right inside the flake, you can tweak what gets passed to the function. For example, the [flake for RedoxOS-development] I contributed[^1] this to passes the custom rust-toolchain.
|
||||
An example for how to do it is already right there: at **[3]**, `pkgs` is provided.
|
||||
|
||||
Another possible tweak: You may want to define separate supported systems for each output.
|
||||
This is useful, for example, if the target environment you're developing for cannot support a development shell.
|
||||
|
||||
For me, the trade-offs are worth it, as they provide greater transparency and control over the flake configuration.
|
||||
|
||||
That being said, I fully acknowledge that `flake-utils` can still be a great choice for many people. It simplifies things and reduces the need to write boilerplate code, which can be a big plus depending on your needs and workflow. Ultimately, it's a matter of personal preference and the specific requirements of your project.
|
||||
|
||||
[^1]: If you check the history, you will see I am not mentioned. I am still a bit salty about that, as it was my first contribution to a bigger OSS project.
|
||||
[Nix]: https://nixos.org/
|
||||
[servicepoint]: https://git.berlin.ccc.de/servicepoint/servicepoint
|
||||
[machine configuration]: https://git.berlin.ccc.de/vinzenz/nixos-configuration
|
||||
[flake-utils]: https://github.com/numtide/flake-utils
|
||||
[`nixpkgs.lib.system.flake-exposed`]: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/374e6bcc403e02a35e07b650463c01a52b13a7c8/lib/systems/default.nix#L58
|
||||
[flake for RedoxOS-development]: https://gitlab.redox-os.org/redox-os/redox/-/blob/cb34b9bd862f46729c0082c37a41782a3b1319c3/flake.nix#L38
|
17
flake.nix
17
flake.nix
|
@ -26,23 +26,6 @@
|
|||
packages = forAllSystems (
|
||||
{ pkgs, ... }:
|
||||
rec {
|
||||
hugo-theme-m10c = pkgs.stdenv.mkDerivation {
|
||||
pname = "hugo-theme-m10c";
|
||||
homepage = "https://themes.gohugo.io/themes/hugo-theme-m10c/";
|
||||
version = "";
|
||||
|
||||
src = pkgs.fetchFromGitHub {
|
||||
owner = "vaga";
|
||||
repo = "hugo-theme-m10c";
|
||||
rev = "862c6e941be9bc46ce8adc6a2fa9e984ba647d6f";
|
||||
hash = "sha256-wcJSGjL/u43hPLblPmUhusqiMmadVBWJhihRinRXqzg=";
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
installPhase = ''
|
||||
mkdir -p $out
|
||||
cp -r * $out
|
||||
'';
|
||||
};
|
||||
hugo-theme-poison = pkgs.stdenv.mkDerivation {
|
||||
pname = "hugo-theme-poison";
|
||||
homepage = "https://poison.lukeorth.com/";
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue