hyperhive/docs/swarm/sso.md
iris 78021ce982 docs: fix 329 Microsoft.Contractions hits with proper safety checks
Apply contraction fixes across ~40 doc files (setup, integrations, lifecycle,
networking, scheduler, swarm, tools, trust-boundary, UI, etc.). Skipped 14 hits:
- 10 where words appear in ALL CAPS for deliberate emphasis (is NOT, do NOT, etc.)
- 4 where text could not be safely located due to markdown formatting or column position

Applied via systematic scan with checks for fenced code blocks, inline code spans,
and intentional caps. Preserves sentence-initial capitalization throughout.
2026-09-07 16:28:06 +02:00

252 lines
12 KiB
Markdown

# Swarm SSO
The swarm runs one authelia, and it's two things at once: the **session
provider** every protected vhost checks (`auth_request`), and — once any
client is declared — an **OIDC provider** issuing tokens to relying
parties: the forge and the matrix homeserver.
The second role is derived rather than switched:
`services.hyperhive.swarm.authelia.oidc.clients` being non-empty turns it
on. authelia refuses to start with a provider that has no clients, so a
separate `enable` would be a second fact free to disagree with the first.
## Getting in the first time
authelia binds loopback only. The **gateway** on the host running it
publishes it as `auth.<swarm.domain>` — vhost, dnsmasq record and TLS
name all follow `deploy.authelia`, so there is nothing to turn on
separately. (Details, including why a client hive must not declare that
vhost: [`../networking/gateway.md`](../networking/gateway.md).)
**Authelia doesn't start until at least one user exists.** The user
store is generated empty — deliberately, since seeding a default account
would put a credential in a config file — but authelia validates it at
startup and treats "no users" as fatal:
```
error reading the authentication database: could not validate the schema:
users: non zero value required
```
It then exits 1 and systemd restarts it, so a swarm that has been
enabled but not bootstrapped shows a **crash-looping unit** and `502 Bad
Gateway` from the vhost — not a login page with nobody able to use it.
The gateway is working in that state; the upstream isn't up.
⚠️ So the step below is **required to finish the install**, not an
optional first-login convenience. Run it before concluding anything is
wrong with the proxy: a 502 here means "no users yet" far more often
than it means a routing fault.
Add the first subject on the host running authelia:
```console
# swarmctl user add mara --display-name Mara --email mara@example.com --group admins
added mara to /var/lib/authelia-swarm/users.yml
password: <generated>
this password is stored nowhere — record it now
```
The password is generated, hashed, and printed once; only the hash is
kept. `swarmctl` reads and writes authelia's `users.yml` directly — it's
the one user store, shared with `swarm-authelia-bridge`, which creates
agent identities in the same file. No restart: authelia watches it. Full
reference: [`../tools/swarmctl-cli.md`](../tools/swarmctl-cli.md).
You can edit `users.yml` by hand, and `swarmctl` will read what you
wrote. ⚠️ It rewrites the whole file on every change, so **comments and
formatting don't survive**; values and unrecognised keys do.
This step stays manual on purpose. Bootstrapping an identity provider
non-interactively means a secret arriving from somewhere — a file, an
env var, a nix expression — and every one of those is worse than an
operator typing one command once.
### Changing a subject afterwards
`user add` only ever adds: on a name that already exists it refuses,
rather than resurfacing as a second account or a silent overwrite.
Editing an existing subject is `user update`, and the flags compose, so
one call can change several things:
```console
# swarmctl user update mara --add-group admins --email mara@example.com
added to group "admins"
email: unset -> "mara@example.com"
mara is now in groups: admins
```
Two behaviours worth knowing before you rely on them:
- **`--remove-group` fails if the user isn't in that group.** Every
other flag is idempotent — setting what's already set is fine, so a
"make these four things true" call doesn't break when one of them
already was. Revocation is the exception on purpose: a typo'd group
name that reported success would leave an account holding access you
believe you took away, and that's the one outcome nobody re-checks.
- **The resulting group list is printed** because group names have no
registry anywhere. A misspelled `--add-group` creates a real group that
no access-control rule mentions, so the user gains nothing and no error
is possible — reading the line back is the only check there is.
Passwords are deliberately out of scope here: regenerating a credential
is a different intent from editing an attribute, and folding them means
an attribute edit can invalidate a login by accident.
## What secrets exist, and where each one lives
Every secret in the swarm, with its generator and its path, is tabulated
in one place: [`secrets.md`](secrets.md), including authelia's own keys
(session, JWT, storage-encryption, OIDC HMAC, OIDC issuer) and the two
halves of each client secret. That page's two rules — a secret is always
a path, never a value, and the generator and the reader are usually in
different containers — are why the client secret's plaintext half needs
the delivery step below and the rest of authelia's keys don't.
## Getting the plaintext to the relying party
Three cases, and they're genuinely different mechanisms rather than one
mechanism with flags.
### 1. All-local — one host runs both
Nothing to configure at all. Per service, a host-side unit waits for
authelia's first boot to mint that client's secret and copies it into the
service's container, and the service's own module contributes its client
entry — callback URL included — to authelia's client list.
The callback is built once and read twice, so the redirect URI authelia is
told to allow and the one the service actually sends can't drift apart. A
mismatch there is a rejected login with no error text worth reading.
⚠️ The delivery is a copy, not a `bindMounts` entry, and deliberately so:
nixos-container refuses to start a container whose bind source is
missing, and this secret doesn't exist until authelia's first boot has
run. Binding it would make the service wait on a file that waits on a
container that starts after it — on a fresh hive, a permanent stall
presenting as "the forge is broken", several layers from its cause.
### 2. Swarm-managed services
The controller side owns provisioning: `swarmctl` writes both halves, the
same way it already owns authelia's user store (`users.yml`, read and
written in place).
### 3. A hive elsewhere
No shared host, so no automatic path. The operator provides the file and
names it:
```nix
services.hyperhive.swarm = {
authelia.url = "https://auth.example.com";
forge.sso = {
enable = true;
clientSecretFile = "/var/lib/hyperhive/forge-oidc-secret";
};
};
```
**Both are asserted at eval.** A hive that boots with SSO
half-configured shows a login button that always fails — a symptom
several layers from its cause, and far worse to diagnose than an
evaluation error.
## Where each relying party differs
The registration half is identical; what each service does with the
result isn't.
| | forge | matrix |
| ------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| how it learns the config | a oneshot calls `forgejo admin auth`, writing a login-source row into its database | tuwunel reads a `[[global.identity_provider]]` entry from its config file |
| how it reads the secret | a path inside its container | the same path, handed on by `LoadCredential` |
| callback URL | `<root>/user/oauth2/<source>/callback` | `<homeserver>/_matrix/client/unstable/login/sso/callback/<client_id>`, a shape tuwunel fixes rather than accepts |
| cost of a malformed entry | the login source is missing | the homeserver can refuse to start |
Two consequences worth stating plainly:
- **tuwunel re-reads its secret file on every OAuth exchange**, not only
at startup, and its own sandboxing hides most paths from it. It gets the
file through `LoadCredential` for the same reason the registration token
does — that keeps `DynamicUser` and `PrivateUsers` intact, with no
host-side ownership arrangement to maintain.
- **Matrix SSO lives inside the homeserver.** The client-server API is
spoken by non-browser clients holding matrix access tokens — every
agent's own daemon — as well as by federation, so `/_matrix/` is served
directly and authenticates itself. The forward-auth vhosts protect
browser surfaces; this isn't one of them.
## Machine clients
Everything above is a person in a browser. A swarm also has callers that
hold no session and follow no redirect: the telemetry collector, the
queue's auth-callout responder, and each hive's own agents.
**One client per hive, not one per service.** A hive's identity belongs to
the directory rather than to whichever service happens to consume it, so a
hive holds a single OIDC client — `<hiveClientPrefix><hive>` — and mints a
different token per service from it. The alternative, letting each
consuming subsystem declare its own list, collides on the same client id
the moment a second consumer appears.
**The audience is that client id.** A swarm service that has to tell hives
apart needs one name both sides already agree on, and the client id is
already that name. A parallel per-hive naming scheme would be a second
thing to keep in step, and it drifts silently — a mismatch presents as a
valid token refused at the target, which reads like a broken credential
rather than a broken name.
**Tokens are signed (`RS256`), not opaque**, because a resource server
that can't call the provider back is a real case here: the telemetry
collector verifies offline against `/jwks.json`, and an opaque token gives
it nothing to verify. The queue's responder introspects instead — a
different question asked of the same token, and the reason both
`/api/oidc/introspection` and `/jwks.json` have to stay reachable.
### Machine callers must fail closed
⚠️ **An error page that answers `200` is a security bug, not a cosmetic
one.** The browser surface intercepts upstream errors and serves a
friendly "SSO is unavailable" page; that page is a file, so it returns
`200`. Any machine caller routed through it receives a success carrying
HTML instead of the failure that actually happened:
- `/api/authz/auth-request` — nginx `auth_request` treats **any 2xx as
success**, so a down provider means _access granted_
- `/api/oidc/introspection` — a token check that answers `200`
- `/api/oidc/token`, `/.well-known/openid-configuration` — a client
parsing an error page as its JSON document
So authelia's `/api/` and `/.well-known/` prefixes are routed **without**
error interception. The split is by _audience_, not by an enumerated path
list: a human gets the page, every machine caller gets the status.
Enumerating endpoints individually would leave the next one added
silently intercepted.
The same shape bites any machine route behind a browser-shaped gate: a
`302` to a login page is followed, the login page answers `200`, and the
caller reports success while nothing happened. Log ingest hit exactly this
and lost eleven hours of delivery in silence.
**Checking it, if you change this routing.** Point the vhost at a dead
upstream and compare three requests, not one:
1. through `/` — must still serve the friendly page
2. through `/api/` — must deny
3. a direct dial to authelia — must match what (2) did
All three matter. A change that silently deleted the browser page would
pass a deny-only check, and one that quietly stopped denying would pass a
page-only check. This was verified that way when the split was introduced.
## What this doesn't do
- **It doesn't disable local login.** Each service keeps its password
database and gains a second door. An identity provider that can take a
service offline when it hiccups is worse than one with two ways in.
Making authelia the only path is a separate, reversible switch per
service (tuwunel's `login_with_password`, forgejo's own setting).
- **It doesn't provision users.** Agents are created and destroyed
continuously, so the subject set belongs to a program rather than to a
config file; today that program is `swarmctl`.