Hit both today doing a live QA pass on the gateway: plain nixpkgs#chromium has no color-emoji font (tofu boxes read exactly like a missing-icon bug), and a page whose content loads async after the initial paint (SSE, fetch-on-mount) screenshots as a bare "loading..." placeholder without --virtual-time-budget. Neither is a real product bug, but both need a documented fix for when an accurate render actually matters, not just "know to discount it."
5.4 KiB
| name | description |
|---|---|
| headless-screenshot | Take a real screenshot of an HTML/CSS page from inside a container with no browser installed - `nix shell nixpkgs#chromium --command chromium --headless=new --disable-gpu --no-sandbox --screenshot=<out.png> --window-size=<w>,<h> "file://<path-or-url>"` renders the page and writes a PNG in one command, no puppeteer/playwright or pre-installed browser needed (only needed for scripted interaction like clicking, not a static render). Use this whenever you're about to claim a CSS/layout/frontend change looks right, whenever a PR reviewer or the operator asks to see a screenshot of a web UI change, or before asking a peer GUI-testing agent to screenshot something you could just render yourself - reasoning about a visual change from source or compiled CSS alone is not the same as actually seeing it rendered, and a real browser is one shell command away even when `which chromium` comes back empty. |
Headless Screenshot
"No browser in this container" usually means no browser is
pre-installed, not that one is unreachable. nixpkgs#chromium is a
nix shell away, and a single headless invocation renders a page and
writes a PNG without a running server, a display, or any scripted
interaction library.
The command
nix shell nixpkgs#chromium --command chromium \
--headless=new --disable-gpu --no-sandbox \
--screenshot=/path/to/out.png \
--window-size=1200,900 \
"file:///path/to/page.html"
--no-sandboxis required inside most agent containers (no user namespaces for Chromium's sandbox);--disable-gpusidesteps GPU init failures in a headless environment. Both are safe defaults here- this isn't a browser you're exposing to untrusted input.
- The target can be a local
file://path or a realhttp(s)://URL (a dev server, a serveddist/, a deployed page) - same command either way. --window-sizesets the viewport; match it to what you actually want to see (a narrow width to check a mobile layout, a wide one for a dashboard row).- Swap
--screenshot=for--dump-dom=to get the rendered DOM as text instead of an image - useful for confirming markup/attributes landed correctly without needing to eyeball pixels.
Stray dbus/UPower errors on stderr are harmless container noise
(no session bus, no power daemon) - ignore them as long as the PNG
file actually gets written.
When source-reading isn't enough
Grepping compiled CSS or tracing class names tells you the rules exist and target the right selectors - it doesn't tell you what the result actually looks like (wrong tier picked, two rules fighting, a value that's technically correct but visually off). Before telling someone a layout/CSS change "looks right," or before reaching for a peer agent's GUI-testing capability, try rendering it yourself first:
- Testing a real page: serve the built
dist/(or point at wherever it's already deployed) and screenshot that - it's the actual production bundle, not a reconstruction. - Testing an isolated CSS change (e.g. a shared stylesheet used by several pages): a small self-contained HTML file with the real CSS inlined and a few representative markup samples is faster to build than standing up a server, and just as honest about what the CSS actually renders.
- Attach it: post the PNG as a PR/issue comment (or file attachment) alongside a one-line note on what it's rendered from - a reviewer with no browser either benefits from the same shortcut.
What this doesn't replace
This is a static render, not a browser automation tool. Verifying an interaction (a click, a hover state, a form submission) needs puppeteer/playwright or similar - reach for those only when the question is genuinely about behavior, not appearance. A missing emoji/glyph rendering as a box in the screenshot is usually a font availability artifact of the headless environment, not a real bug - don't mistake one for the other when reporting results.
Two false-positive traps (and their fixes)
Both of these look exactly like a real product bug in a naive screenshot and aren't - check for them before filing anything, and use the fix below if you actually need an accurate render (e.g. to judge icon/glyph layout, not just to note "there'd be an icon here").
- Tofu boxes instead of emoji. Plain
nixpkgs#chromiumhas no color-emoji font, so any 🖥/📡/🔨-style glyph renders as an empty box. Addnixpkgs#noto-fonts-color-emojito thenix shell- but aFONTCONFIG_FILEthat lists only the emoji dir throws away the base fonts and blanks all normal text instead, which is its own false alarm. Merge, don't override:cat > fonts.conf <<EOF <?xml version="1.0"?> <!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "fonts.dtd"> <fontconfig> <include ignore_missing="yes">/etc/fonts/fonts.conf</include> <dir>$(nix eval --raw nixpkgs#noto-fonts-color-emoji)/share/fonts</dir> </fontconfig> EOF FONTCONFIG_FILE=$PWD/fonts.conf nix shell nixpkgs#chromium nixpkgs#noto-fonts-color-emoji \ --command chromium --headless=new --disable-gpu --no-sandbox \ --screenshot=out.png --window-size=1440,900 "https://example/" - A bare "loading..." placeholder instead of real content. A page
whose content arrives after the initial paint (SSE, a
fetchon mount) can get captured before that data lands - the default--screenshotdoesn't wait for it. Add--virtual-time-budget=8000(milliseconds; tune to the page) to let it actually settle first.