Fixes 22 of 23 Microsoft.Hyphens hits: an adverb ending in -ly doesn't
need a hyphen to the word it modifies (minimally scoped, currently
running, deliberately stopped, ...) -- the -ly ending already
unambiguously signals it's modifying the following word, so the
hyphen is redundant per Microsoft style.
Left one hit alone: docs/web-ui/dashboard.md's 'checked-not-originally-
active' is a single 4-word compound designator (parallel structure
with 'unchecked-was-active' right before it in the same sentence,
describing a diffing algorithm's two possible states), not an
ordinary -ly-adverb modifier -- dropping just the one hyphen vale
flagged would have broken the compound into a dangling
'checked-not-originally active' fragment. Also rewrote
docs/scheduler/coordinator.md's 'still-fully-queued' as a predicate
('DAGs that are still fully queued') rather than leaving a similar
broken partial-hyphen chain, since 'still' and 'fully' are both plain
adverbs with no reason to hyphenate at all once dehyphenated
consistently.
Verified via vale: only the one deliberately-left hit remains.
2.7 KiB
The job queue, for operators
Every container operation — rebuild, first-spawn, a config-PR deploy,
power changes — runs through one shared job queue. This page explains
what the job queue is, as a general idea, independent of what any one
subsystem uses it for. For the hive-c0re-specific step catalogue and the
engineering internals (scheduler, leases, resource windows) see
coordinator.md instead.
What the job queue is, in the abstract
"jobq" is a generic engine for running many interdependent jobs under limited concurrency — it has no idea what a "container" or a "rebuild" is. Two ideas are all there is to it:
- A job is a small graph of steps, not one opaque blob. Steps can depend on each other (this step only starts once that one finishes), so a big operation is really a short, ordered sequence — not a single black box that's either "done" or "not done."
- A step can need a shared resource, which only so many steps can hold at once (a "slot"). If every currently running step already holds the slots it needs, a new step that wants the same one waits its turn — that's the whole reason things queue instead of all firing at once.
The engine's whole job is: whenever a step's ordering and resource needs are both satisfied, run it. It has no opinion on what the steps do — that's supplied by whoever builds the graph. hive-c0re is the one thing building graphs on it today, but nothing about the engine is specific to containers or rebuilds; there's nothing stopping another subsystem from using the same engine for its own unrelated queue.
Watching it happen
Each row you see in a queue view (the BU1LDS page's R3BU1LD QU3U3
— see web-ui/dashboard.md — and swarm-ui's
/jobs page both render the same underlying graph) is one job; the rows
nested under it are that job's steps, in order (occasionally a couple run
side by side). A step shows one of:
| Glyph | Meaning |
|---|---|
⏸ |
queued, waiting its turn |
▶ |
running |
◐ |
its own work is done, waiting on a step nested under it |
✔ |
finished successfully |
✖ |
failed |
⊘ |
cancelled |
· |
skipped (not needed for this run) |
A step that isn't needed for a given run shows as · rather than being
left out of the tree entirely, so the same kind of operation keeps a
recognizable shape run to run, whichever steps it actually needed.