Per mara on the CA question: outside all-local this is an ops problem, and what is missing is documentation rather than machinery. One row per secret, read against three topologies, because the same credential is generated in place on one and handed over by an operator on another. sso.md's table is replaced by a pointer -- two tables listing the same secrets would drift, and its prose about why a secret is generated in-container is the half worth keeping there. States the constraint the whole thing rests on: a hive CA is name- constrained to the hive domain and a swarm service name is a sibling of it, so a hive CA cannot issue a swarm-service certificate at all. That is why placing the swarm root is an operations decision.
195 lines
8.7 KiB
Markdown
195 lines
8.7 KiB
Markdown
# Swarm SSO
|
|
|
|
The swarm runs one authelia, and it is two things at once: the **session
|
|
provider** every protected vhost checks (`auth_request`), and — once any
|
|
client is declared — an **OIDC provider** issuing tokens to relying
|
|
parties: the forge and the matrix homeserver.
|
|
|
|
The second role is derived rather than switched:
|
|
`services.hyperhive.swarm.authelia.oidc.clients` being non-empty turns it
|
|
on. authelia refuses to start with a provider that has no clients, so a
|
|
separate `enable` would be a second fact free to disagree with the first.
|
|
|
|
## Getting in the first time
|
|
|
|
authelia binds loopback only. The **gateway** on the host running it
|
|
publishes it as `auth.<swarm.domain>` — vhost, dnsmasq record and TLS
|
|
name all follow `swarm.authelia.enable`, so there is nothing to turn on
|
|
separately. (Details, including why a client hive must not declare that
|
|
vhost: [`../gateway.md`](../gateway.md).)
|
|
|
|
**Authelia does not start until at least one user exists.** The user
|
|
store is generated empty — deliberately, since seeding a default account
|
|
would put a credential in a config file — but authelia validates it at
|
|
startup and treats "no users" as fatal:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
error reading the authentication database: could not validate the schema:
|
|
users: non zero value required
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
It then exits 1 and systemd restarts it, so a swarm that has been
|
|
enabled but not bootstrapped shows a **crash-looping unit** and `502 Bad
|
|
Gateway` from the vhost — not a login page with nobody able to use it.
|
|
The gateway is working in that state; the upstream is not up.
|
|
|
|
⚠️ So the step below is **required to finish the install**, not an
|
|
optional first-login convenience. Run it before concluding anything is
|
|
wrong with the proxy: a 502 here means "no users yet" far more often
|
|
than it means a routing fault.
|
|
|
|
Add the first subject on the host running authelia:
|
|
|
|
```console
|
|
# swarmctl user add mara --display-name Mara --email mara@example.com --group admins
|
|
added mara to /var/lib/authelia-swarm/users.yml
|
|
password: <generated>
|
|
this password is stored nowhere — record it now
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
The password is generated, hashed, and printed once; only the hash is
|
|
kept. `swarmctl` writes its canonical `users.json`, re-renders authelia's
|
|
`users.yml` from it, and restarts authelia. Full reference:
|
|
[`../tools/swarmctl-cli.md`](../tools/swarmctl-cli.md).
|
|
|
|
This step stays manual on purpose. Bootstrapping an identity provider
|
|
non-interactively means a secret arriving from somewhere — a file, an
|
|
env var, a nix expression — and every one of those is worse than an
|
|
operator typing one command once.
|
|
|
|
### Changing a subject afterwards
|
|
|
|
`user add` only ever adds: on a name that already exists it refuses,
|
|
rather than resurfacing as a second account or a silent overwrite.
|
|
Editing an existing subject is `user update`, and the flags compose, so
|
|
one call can change several things:
|
|
|
|
```console
|
|
# swarmctl user update mara --add-group admins --email mara@example.com
|
|
added to group "admins"
|
|
email: unset -> "mara@example.com"
|
|
mara is now in groups: admins
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Two behaviours worth knowing before you rely on them:
|
|
|
|
- **`--remove-group` fails if the user is not in that group.** Every
|
|
other flag is idempotent — setting what is already set is fine, so a
|
|
"make these four things true" call does not break when one of them
|
|
already was. Revocation is the exception on purpose: a typo'd group
|
|
name that reported success would leave an account holding access you
|
|
believe you took away, and that is the one outcome nobody re-checks.
|
|
- **The resulting group list is printed** because group names have no
|
|
registry anywhere. A misspelled `--add-group` creates a real group that
|
|
no access-control rule mentions, so the user gains nothing and no error
|
|
is possible — reading the line back is the only check there is.
|
|
|
|
Passwords are deliberately out of scope here: regenerating a credential
|
|
is a different intent from editing an attribute, and folding them means
|
|
an attribute edit can invalidate a login by accident.
|
|
|
|
## What secrets exist, and where each one lives
|
|
|
|
Every secret in the swarm, with its generator and its path, is tabulated
|
|
in one place: [`secrets.md`](secrets.md). The rows relevant here are
|
|
authelia's own keys (session, JWT, storage-encryption, OIDC HMAC, OIDC
|
|
issuer) plus the two halves of each client secret.
|
|
|
|
What matters for this page is the shape rather than the paths. Authelia's
|
|
own keys are generated **in-container**, because nothing outside that
|
|
container ever reads them — that is the test worth applying to any secret
|
|
added here. The plaintext half of a client secret is the one that fails
|
|
it: its reader lives in a different container, and that is the entire
|
|
reason a delivery step exists.
|
|
|
|
**None of it is ever written into a nix expression.** authelia's
|
|
`settings` are rendered into the nix store, which is world-readable and
|
|
permanent, so the client digest reaches authelia through `settingsFiles`
|
|
(merged at runtime) and every other secret through a `*File` option
|
|
carrying a path rather than a value.
|
|
|
|
## Getting the plaintext to the relying party
|
|
|
|
Three cases, and they are genuinely different mechanisms rather than one
|
|
mechanism with flags.
|
|
|
|
### 1. All-local — one host runs both
|
|
|
|
Nothing to configure beyond `swarm.forge.sso.enable = true` or
|
|
`swarm.matrix.sso.enable = true`. Per service, a host-side unit waits for
|
|
authelia's first boot to mint that client's secret and copies it into the
|
|
service's container, and the service's own module contributes its client
|
|
entry — callback URL included — to authelia's client list.
|
|
|
|
The callback is built once and read twice, so the redirect URI authelia is
|
|
told to allow and the one the service actually sends cannot drift apart. A
|
|
mismatch there is a rejected login with no error text worth reading.
|
|
|
|
⚠️ The delivery is a copy, not a `bindMounts` entry, and deliberately so:
|
|
nixos-container refuses to start a container whose bind source is
|
|
missing, and this secret does not exist until authelia's first boot has
|
|
run. Binding it would make the service wait on a file that waits on a
|
|
container that starts after it — on a fresh hive, a permanent stall
|
|
presenting as "the forge is broken", several layers from its cause.
|
|
|
|
### 2. Swarm-managed services
|
|
|
|
The controller side owns provisioning: `swarmctl` writes both halves, the
|
|
same way it already owns authelia's user store (`users.json` canonical,
|
|
`users.yml` a rendered artifact).
|
|
|
|
### 3. A hive elsewhere
|
|
|
|
No shared host, so no automatic path. The operator provides the file and
|
|
names it:
|
|
|
|
```nix
|
|
services.hyperhive.swarm = {
|
|
authelia.url = "https://auth.example.com";
|
|
forge.sso = {
|
|
enable = true;
|
|
clientSecretFile = "/var/lib/hyperhive/forge-oidc-secret";
|
|
};
|
|
};
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Both are asserted at eval.** A hive that boots with SSO
|
|
half-configured shows a login button that always fails — a symptom
|
|
several layers from its cause, and far worse to diagnose than an
|
|
evaluation error.
|
|
|
|
## Where each relying party differs
|
|
|
|
The registration half is identical; what each service does with the
|
|
result is not.
|
|
|
|
| | forge | matrix |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
|
| how it learns the config | a oneshot calls `forgejo admin auth`, writing a login-source row into its database | tuwunel reads a `[[global.identity_provider]]` entry from its config file |
|
|
| how it reads the secret | a path inside its container | the same path, handed on by `LoadCredential` |
|
|
| callback URL | `<root>/user/oauth2/<source>/callback` | `<homeserver>/_matrix/client/unstable/login/sso/callback/<client_id>`, a shape tuwunel fixes rather than accepts |
|
|
| cost of a malformed entry | the login source is missing | the homeserver can refuse to start |
|
|
|
|
Two consequences worth stating plainly:
|
|
|
|
- **tuwunel re-reads its secret file on every OAuth exchange**, not only
|
|
at startup, and its own sandboxing hides most paths from it. It gets the
|
|
file through `LoadCredential` for the same reason the registration token
|
|
does — that keeps `DynamicUser` and `PrivateUsers` intact, with no
|
|
host-side ownership arrangement to maintain.
|
|
- **Matrix SSO lives inside the homeserver.** The client-server API is
|
|
spoken by non-browser clients holding matrix access tokens — every
|
|
agent's own daemon — as well as by federation, so `/_matrix/` is served
|
|
directly and authenticates itself. The forward-auth vhosts protect
|
|
browser surfaces; this is not one of them.
|
|
|
|
## What this does not do
|
|
|
|
- **It does not disable local login.** Each service keeps its password
|
|
database and gains a second door. An identity provider that can take a
|
|
service offline when it hiccups is worse than one with two ways in.
|
|
Making authelia the only path is a separate, reversible switch per
|
|
service (tuwunel's `login_with_password`, forgejo's own setting).
|
|
- **It does not provision users.** Agents are created and destroyed
|
|
continuously, so the subject set belongs to a program rather than to a
|
|
config file; today that program is `swarmctl`.
|