hyperhive/docs/scheduler/jobq.md
iris 04e27c4fb6 docs: suppress reviewed write-good.Passive false positives
133 hits across 38 files, all previously classified during #4548's sweep
and deliberately left un-rewritten (predicate-adjective state/necessity
description, design-intent idiom, structural/type-description idiom,
no-single-actor topology claim, parallel-triple exception, vale
substring-match artifact — see hyperhive#4548's per-PR bodies for the
per-hit reasoning).

Wraps each one in a scoped <!-- vale write-good.Passive = NO/YES -->
pair (the supported mechanism — TokenIgnores has a known offset-drift
bug) rather than a blanket per-file or per-rule silence, so a *new*
passive-voice hit anywhere in these files still fails once the rule
gates CI (next commit). Table/list false positives (docs/swarm/credentials.md's
renewal-table cells) wrap the whole block, not each cell.

Part of #4546.
2026-09-20 16:24:11 +02:00

60 lines
3.1 KiB
Markdown

# The job queue, for operators
Every container operation — rebuild, first-spawn, a config-PR deploy,
power changes — runs through one shared job queue. This page explains
what the job queue _is_, as a general idea, independent of what any one
subsystem uses it for. For the hive-c0re-specific step catalogue and the
engineering internals (scheduler, leases, resource windows) see
[`coordinator.md`](coordinator.md) instead.
## What the job queue is, in the abstract
"jobq" is a generic engine for running many interdependent jobs under
limited concurrency — it has no idea what a "container" or a "rebuild" is.
Two ideas are all there is to it:
- **A job is a small graph of steps**, not one opaque blob. Steps can
depend on each other (this step only starts once that one finishes), so
a big operation is really a short, ordered sequence — not a single
black box that's either "done" or "not done."
- **A step can need a shared resource**, which only so many steps can hold
at once (a "slot"). If every currently running step already holds the
slots it needs, a new step that wants the same one waits its turn —
that's the whole reason things queue instead of all firing at once.
The engine's whole job is: whenever a step's ordering and resource needs
are both satisfied, run it. It has no opinion on what the steps _do_
that's supplied by whoever builds the graph. hive-c0re is the one thing
building graphs on it today, but nothing about the engine is specific to
containers or rebuilds; there's nothing stopping another subsystem from
using the same engine for its own unrelated queue.
## Watching it happen
Each **row** you see in a queue view (the **BU1LDS** page's R3BU1LD QU3U3
— see [`web-ui/dashboard.md`](../web-ui/dashboard.md) — and swarm-ui's
`/jobs` page both render the same underlying graph) is one job; the rows
nested under it are that job's steps, in order (occasionally a couple run
side by side). A step shows one of:
<!-- vale write-good.Passive = NO -->
| Glyph | Meaning |
| ----- | ------------------------------------------------------- |
| `⏸` | queued, waiting its turn |
| `▶` | running |
| `◐` | its own work is done, waiting on a step nested under it |
| `✔` | finished successfully |
| `✖` | failed |
| `⊘` | cancelled |
| `·` | skipped (not needed for this run) |
<!-- vale write-good.Passive = YES -->
A step that isn't needed for a given run stays in the graph as `·` rather
than being absent from it, so the same kind of operation keeps a
recognizable shape run to run, whichever steps it actually needed.
⚠️ **The view hides `✔` and `·` by default**, so that full shape isn't what
you see first — tick them back on in the state filter. The selection is
part of the request, not a display toggle: hidden states are never fetched.