115de60b09
mara's review, addressed with evidence not assertions: - Microsoft.Contractions: re-enabled per her flat disagreement, no argument. - Microsoft.Passive vs write-good.Passive: she asked what the difference actually is. Ran both individually against the full docs/ tree and diffed the exact file:line:col sets -- 726/726 identical, zero difference either direction. Genuinely redundant, not assumed. write-good.Passive stays enabled (agreed base style), Microsoft.Passive drops as the literal duplicate. - write-good.Passive: she disputed my invented examples (correctly -- a clean single-actor rewrite does read better active). Pulled 10 real hits from the actual docs tree instead of inventing more sentences; most have a generic/implicit actor where passive reads naturally, not a clear active-voice win. Re-enabled per the redundancy point above rather than disabled as "mostly noise". - Microsoft.Dashes: same outcome (stays disabled, retrofitting ~2000 existing occurrences is out of scope here) but the reasoning was wrong -- not a "deliberate convention", an incidental one nobody chose. Rewritten. - Microsoft.Adverbs, alex.ProfanityUnlikely, write-good.E-Prime, Microsoft.HeadingAcronyms: moved to an explicit "wave 2 candidates" section -- disabled for this rollout, not dismissed. Each needs a real false-positive-rate pass or an actual rewrite pass through the flagged instances before a permanent call. - Dropped the .vale.ini header's pointer to "the PR description" for rationale -- not durable/visible enough as a reference from a file that lives in the repo. Rationale is now fully inline per rule. 1069 more hits than the previous round (726 write-good.Passive + 343 Contractions, Microsoft.Passive's 726 removed) -- 1732 total across 50 files.
8 lines
156 B
Text
8 lines
156 B
Text
/target
|
|
/result
|
|
/result-*
|
|
/.tmp
|
|
/.claude/settings.local.json
|
|
*.rlib
|
|
# `vale sync` fetches these fresh into place; not vendored (see .vale.ini).
|
|
/.vale-data
|