//! `swarm-authelia-bridge` — the only thing allowed to write //! `swarm-authelia`'s users database. //! //! Runs **inside the `swarm-authelia` container**, as //! `User = "authelia-swarm";` (the literal name //! `swarm-authelia.nix`'s `unitName` already derives) — the same user //! authelia's own instance runs as, and therefore the file's actual //! owner. That is the whole answer to "how does an unprivileged //! `swarm-controller` touch a file it doesn't own": it doesn't — this //! process does, sidestepping the uid boundary instead of bridging it //! with root/`CAP_CHOWN`/a shared group (all examined and rejected — see //! `swarmctl/README.md`'s own identical analysis of this same file). //! //! Network-facing, not unix-socket-only: `swarm-authelia`'s container //! shares the host netns (`privateNetwork = false`, same as `hive-forge`/ //! `hive-matrix`), so one listener serves a co-located `swarm-controller` //! (loopback) and a split-host one (bind wider, firewall it) with the //! same code path — no separate transport for the cross-host case. //! Bearer-authenticated via authelia's own OIDC token introspection (RFC //! 7662) against `swarm-controller`'s **existing** machine-client //! identity (already minted for the queue connection) — no new //! credential to mint or deliver, and always local/fast to verify since //! this process runs right next to the authelia it asks. //! //! One endpoint, `POST /requests`, body = //! [`swarm_authelia_bridge_sock::BridgeRequest`] verbatim: ensure an agent //! exists as an authelia subject, list the ones that do, and list the //! operator group (to `swarm-controller` only, see `permit`). Not a //! wholesale-replace-the-file API — this process owns rendering //! `users.yml` internally; see `store` module. mod introspect; mod store; use std::sync::Arc; use anyhow::{Context, Result, bail}; use axum::extract::State; use axum::http::{HeaderMap, StatusCode}; use axum::response::{IntoResponse, Response}; use axum::routing::post; use axum::{Json, Router}; use swarm_authelia_bridge_sock::{AgentIdentity, BridgeRequest, BridgeResponse}; /// Where the introspecting bearer token is authenticated *to* — this /// bridge's own authelia machine client, distinct from /// `swarm-controller`'s (the token being checked). Set by the nix module /// that provisions this bridge's own client alongside authelia. struct Config { bind: String, users_file: std::path::PathBuf, authelia_bin: std::path::PathBuf, introspection_url: String, client_id: String, client_secret: String, /// The one client [`BridgeRequest::ListOperators`] answers. operator_reader_client_id: String, /// The authelia group whose members are operators. operator_group: String, } impl Config { fn from_env() -> Result { Ok(Self { bind: env_var("SWARM_AUTHELIA_BRIDGE_BIND")?, users_file: env_var("SWARM_AUTHELIA_BRIDGE_USERS_FILE")?.into(), authelia_bin: env_var("SWARM_AUTHELIA_BRIDGE_AUTHELIA_BIN")?.into(), introspection_url: env_var("SWARM_AUTHELIA_BRIDGE_INTROSPECTION_URL")?, client_id: env_var("SWARM_AUTHELIA_BRIDGE_CLIENT_ID")?, client_secret: read_secret_file(&env_var("SWARM_AUTHELIA_BRIDGE_CLIENT_SECRET_FILE")?)?, operator_reader_client_id: env_var("SWARM_AUTHELIA_BRIDGE_OPERATOR_READER_CLIENT_ID")?, operator_group: env_var("SWARM_AUTHELIA_BRIDGE_OPERATOR_GROUP")?, }) } } fn env_var(name: &str) -> Result { std::env::var(name).with_context(|| format!("{name} is unset")) } fn read_secret_file(path: &str) -> Result { let raw = std::fs::read_to_string(path).with_context(|| format!("reading secret file {path}"))?; let trimmed = raw.trim(); if trimmed.is_empty() { bail!("secret file {path} is empty"); } Ok(trimmed.to_owned()) } struct AppState { config: Config, http: reqwest::Client, /// Serializes `handle`'s load → insert → publish sequence. Without this, /// two `EnsureAgentIdentity` requests landing close together (real: the /// controller's job worker claims and spawns nodes without waiting for /// each to finish, and `SwarmResourceKind` declares no resource dep /// between two `CreateIdentity` jobs, so they run concurrently) both /// `load_store` the same snapshot, both insert their own agent, and /// whichever `publish`es second silently drops the first agent's entry — /// the store is a plain file, not a database with its own concurrency /// control. `tokio::sync::Mutex`, not `std`'s: held across the `.await`s /// in `generate_password` and `publish`. write_lock: tokio::sync::Mutex<()>, } #[tokio::main] async fn main() -> Result<()> { tracing_subscriber::fmt() .with_env_filter( tracing_subscriber::EnvFilter::try_from_default_env().unwrap_or_else(|_| "info".into()), ) // This is a systemd-managed daemon — stdout always goes to journald, // never a human terminal, and journald doesn't strip ANSI escapes: // they land in victorialogs as raw byte-array spam otherwise. .with_ansi(false) .init(); let config = Config::from_env()?; let bind = config.bind.clone(); let state = Arc::new(AppState { config, http: reqwest::Client::new(), write_lock: tokio::sync::Mutex::new(()), }); let app = Router::new() .route("/requests", post(handle_request)) .with_state(state); let listener = tokio::net::TcpListener::bind(&bind) .await .with_context(|| format!("binding {bind}"))?; tracing::info!(%bind, "swarm-authelia-bridge listening"); axum::serve(listener, app) .await .context("serving swarm-authelia-bridge") } /// The single endpoint — body is the wire-crate's [`BridgeRequest`] /// verbatim (JSON), not a per-operation REST route. That is what let the /// second operation arrive as a match arm rather than as another route /// with its own extractor and its own copy of the authorize call. async fn handle_request( State(state): State>, headers: HeaderMap, Json(req): Json, ) -> Response { let caller = match authorize(&state, &headers).await { Ok(caller) => caller, Err(resp) => return resp, }; respond(&state.config, &state.write_lock, caller.as_deref(), req).await } /// Everything after authentication: the per-request [`permit`] check, then /// the operation. Takes the config and the write lock rather than /// [`AppState`], whose HTTP client only [`authorize`] uses. async fn respond( config: &Config, write_lock: &tokio::sync::Mutex<()>, caller: Option<&str>, req: BridgeRequest, ) -> Response { if let Err(refusal) = permit(&req, caller, &config.operator_reader_client_id) { // The client id is not a credential; naming it is what lets an // operator see which client asked for something it may not have. tracing::warn!(client_id = ?caller, request = ?req, "refused a request scoped to another client"); return refuse(refusal); } let (op, result) = match req { BridgeRequest::EnsureAgentIdentity { name } => { ("ensure_identity", handle(config, write_lock, name).await) } BridgeRequest::ListAgentIdentities => ("list_identities", list(config)), BridgeRequest::ListOperators => ("list_operators", list_operators(config)), }; match result { Ok(body) => (StatusCode::OK, Json(body)).into_response(), Err(e) => { let detail = format!("{e:#}"); tracing::warn!(op, error = %detail, "request failed"); ( StatusCode::INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR, Json(BridgeResponse::Error { message: detail }), ) .into_response() } } } /// Extract + introspect the bearer token. `Err` carries the response to /// return outright — kept separate from `handle`'s error path, which is /// "the op itself failed," a different case from "the caller was never let /// in." /// /// Anything short of an active token is refused; **which status** depends /// on whose credential failed, see [`Refusal`]. `Ok` carries the client the /// token was issued to, for [`permit`]. async fn authorize(state: &AppState, headers: &HeaderMap) -> Result, Response> { let Some(auth) = headers.get(axum::http::header::AUTHORIZATION) else { return Err(refuse(Refusal::Caller)); }; let Ok(auth) = auth.to_str() else { return Err(refuse(Refusal::Caller)); }; let Some(token) = auth.strip_prefix("Bearer ") else { return Err(refuse(Refusal::Caller)); }; let verdict = introspect::introspect( &state.http, &state.config.introspection_url, &state.config.client_id, &state.config.client_secret, token, ) .await; classify(verdict).map_err(refuse) } /// The admission decision, and the only place that makes it. /// /// Fail-closed: `Ok(())` is reachable from exactly one variant. Split out /// of [`authorize`] so the rule is testable without an authelia — and it is /// the *real* rule, not a restatement of it, because this is the function /// the request path calls. fn classify(verdict: introspect::Verdict) -> Result, Refusal> { match verdict { introspect::Verdict::Active { client_id } => Ok(client_id), introspect::Verdict::Inactive => Err(Refusal::Caller), introspect::Verdict::Unavailable => Err(Refusal::Bridge), } } /// Whether an admitted caller may make this particular request. /// /// [`BridgeRequest::ListOperators`] answers only `operator_reader`, the /// controller's client: authelia also issues machine tokens to every hive and /// every hive's agents, and those are as active as the controller's. A caller /// with no client id is refused it too, rather than compared as a blank. fn permit( req: &BridgeRequest, client_id: Option<&str>, operator_reader: &str, ) -> Result<(), Refusal> { match req { BridgeRequest::EnsureAgentIdentity { .. } | BridgeRequest::ListAgentIdentities => Ok(()), BridgeRequest::ListOperators if client_id == Some(operator_reader) => Ok(()), BridgeRequest::ListOperators => Err(Refusal::Forbidden), } } /// Whose credential was at fault when a request was refused. /// /// The distinction is the whole point: these used to be one 401, so a /// caller whose token was fine was told its token was invalid whenever /// *this bridge* could not authenticate itself to authelia. #[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq)] enum Refusal { /// No token, an unusable header, or a token authelia rejected. Caller, /// This bridge could not get an answer out of authelia at all, so the /// request was never evaluated. Bridge, /// The token is valid, but its client may not make this request. Forbidden, } impl Refusal { /// `401` for the caller; `503` for us; `403` for a valid caller asking /// for something scoped to another client. /// /// 401 would be wrong for [`Refusal::Bridge`] under RFC 7235 — nothing /// about the caller's credential was determined — and it is also the /// least useful thing to say, because a client that believes its token /// is bad will go and mint a new one, which cannot help. /// /// 503 rather than 500 because the overwhelmingly common cause is /// transient by construction: this bridge's own secret is minted on /// authelia's first boot and delivered by a separate unit, so the /// window where it is absent closes on its own. A client retrying is /// doing the right thing. fn status(self) -> StatusCode { match self { Refusal::Caller => StatusCode::UNAUTHORIZED, Refusal::Bridge => StatusCode::SERVICE_UNAVAILABLE, Refusal::Forbidden => StatusCode::FORBIDDEN, } } /// Deliberately coarse for [`Refusal::Caller`]: an unauthenticated /// caller learns that it was refused, never which of the four ways. /// The `Bridge` message says only that validation could not happen — /// no status code, no upstream detail, nothing about the secret. The /// discriminating detail is in this bridge's journal, where it belongs. fn message(self) -> &'static str { match self { Refusal::Caller => "missing or invalid bearer token", Refusal::Bridge => "cannot validate credentials", Refusal::Forbidden => "not permitted", } } } fn refuse(refusal: Refusal) -> Response { ( refusal.status(), Json(BridgeResponse::Error { message: refusal.message().to_owned(), }), ) .into_response() } async fn handle( cfg: &Config, write_lock: &tokio::sync::Mutex<()>, name: String, ) -> Result { store::validate_username(&name)?; // After the charset check and before anything touches the store: a // reserved name is refused on its own terms, not as a side effect of a // collision with whatever happens to be in the file today. store::reject_reserved_name(&name)?; // Held across the whole load → insert → publish sequence, not just the // write — two concurrent `EnsureAgentIdentity` calls must not both read // the same on-disk snapshot before either publishes. See the field's // doc comment on `AppState::write_lock` for why this is reachable in // practice, not just theoretically. let _write_guard = write_lock.lock().await; let mut user_store = store::load_store(&cfg.users_file)?; if user_store.users.contains_key(&name) { // The subject is there, so no password is minted. Whether it gained // the marker here is the caller's business, not an implementation // detail: an unmarked subject is either a pre-marker agent (the // intended migration) or a human created without a group, and this // process cannot tell them apart. So the two outcomes are reported // as different variants rather than folded into one. if store::mark_as_agent(&mut user_store, &name) { store::publish(&cfg.users_file, &mut user_store)?; // `warn`, not `info`: the uneventful path is silent, so anything // logged here is a subject that was *not* an agent a moment ago. // Names the account because "which one" is the entire question // an operator will have. tracing::warn!( subject = %name, "added the agent marker to an EXISTING identity — intended if this \ predates the marker, but the store cannot distinguish that from a \ human account created without a group" ); return Ok(BridgeResponse::Healed); } return Ok(BridgeResponse::AlreadyExists); } let generated = generate_password(&cfg.authelia_bin).await?; user_store.users.insert( name.clone(), store::User { displayname: name.clone(), password: generated, email: None, groups: vec![store::AGENT_GROUP.to_owned()], extra: std::collections::BTreeMap::new(), }, ); store::publish(&cfg.users_file, &mut user_store)?; tracing::info!(agent = %name, "created authelia identity"); Ok(BridgeResponse::Created) } /// The roster: every subject carrying the agent marker. /// /// Takes no write lock. The store is replaced by an atomic rename, so a /// reader sees either the whole old file or the whole new one — and holding /// the lock would make a read wait behind a password mint, which is an /// external process. fn list(config: &Config) -> Result { let user_store = store::load_store(&config.users_file)?; Ok(BridgeResponse::Agents { agents: store::agent_names(&user_store) .into_iter() .filter_map(|name| match hive_types::Ident::parse(&name) { Ok(ident) => Some(AgentIdentity { name: ident }), // The store's charset is wider than an agent name's, because // it holds humans too. Every agent this bridge creates is a // legal `Ident` by construction, so reaching here means a // subject was hand-added to the agent group that cannot be an // agent. Skipped rather than failing the whole roster — one // bad row must not make every other agent invisible — but // logged, because silently shrinking an answer is how a // roster starts lying about who is missing. Err(reason) => { tracing::warn!( subject = %name, %reason, "subject carries the agent group but is not a legal agent name; \ omitting it from the roster" ); None } }) .collect(), }) } /// The operator group's members. No write lock, for [`list`]'s reason. fn list_operators(config: &Config) -> Result { let user_store = store::load_store(&config.users_file)?; Ok(BridgeResponse::Operators { operators: store::group_members(&user_store, &config.operator_group), }) } /// Mint a password digest via the **configured** authelia — the argon2 /// parameters baked into a hash have to match the verifier's, same /// reasoning `swarmctl::generate_password` documents (this is /// deliberately a fresh async port of that function, not a shared one — /// `swarmctl` is a separate binary crate with no lib target). /// /// `--random`, not `--password `: `/proc//cmdline` is /// world-readable, so a password on argv would be readable by any local /// process for the call's lifetime. Only the digest is kept — the /// plaintext is generated and immediately discarded, since nothing reads /// it back today (still an open question what an agent's login actually /// uses this for). async fn generate_password(bin: &std::path::Path) -> Result { let out = tokio::process::Command::new(bin) .args(["crypto", "hash", "generate", "argon2", "--random"]) .output() .await .with_context(|| format!("running {}", bin.display()))?; if !out.status.success() { bail!( "{} failed ({}): {}", bin.display(), out.status, String::from_utf8_lossy(&out.stderr).trim() ); } let stdout = String::from_utf8(out.stdout).context("authelia printed non-UTF-8 output")?; stdout .lines() .find_map(|line| line.trim().strip_prefix("Digest:")) .map(|v| v.trim().to_owned()) .filter(|v| !v.is_empty()) .with_context(|| { format!( "could not parse {}'s output: missing 'Digest:'", bin.display() ) }) } #[cfg(test)] mod tests { use super::{ BridgeRequest, Config, Refusal, StatusCode, classify, introspect::Verdict, permit, respond, }; /// Fail-closed, asserted per variant rather than as one negation: /// splitting blame out of a single denial is exactly the change that /// could have widened admission, so each refusing variant is named on /// its own line. #[test] fn only_an_active_token_is_admitted() { assert_eq!( classify(Verdict::Active { client_id: Some("swarm-controller".to_owned()) }), Ok(Some("swarm-controller".to_owned())) ); assert_eq!( classify(Verdict::Inactive), Err(Refusal::Caller), "authelia evaluated the token and said no" ); assert_eq!( classify(Verdict::Unavailable), Err(Refusal::Bridge), "a bridge that cannot ask must not admit — this variant reports a \ different fault, it is not a softer denial" ); } /// The whole point of the split, asserted on the value rather than /// on message text — the previous code picked its status by matching on /// a log message's wording, which is what let the two collapse. #[test] fn a_refusal_names_whose_credential_failed() { assert_eq!( Refusal::Caller.status(), StatusCode::UNAUTHORIZED, "the caller's token is the problem; retrying with the same one will not help" ); assert_eq!( Refusal::Bridge.status(), StatusCode::SERVICE_UNAVAILABLE, "the request was never evaluated — 401 here accuses the caller of our fault" ); assert_ne!( Refusal::Caller.status(), Refusal::Bridge.status(), "collapsing these back into one status is the bug this exists to prevent" ); } /// No response body may leak which of the four caller-side causes /// applied, nor anything about this bridge's own credential. #[test] fn refusal_messages_say_nothing_useful_to_an_attacker() { for refusal in [Refusal::Caller, Refusal::Bridge, Refusal::Forbidden] { let message = refusal.message(); for leak in ["secret", "client_id", "authelia", "http", "status"] { assert!( !message.to_ascii_lowercase().contains(leak), "{refusal:?} message leaks {leak:?}: {message:?}" ); } } } const CONTROLLER: &str = "swarm-controller"; /// The trust boundary on the operator list. Every caller below holds a /// token authelia calls active — a hive and a hive's agents are issued /// machine tokens too — and only the controller's client is answered. #[test] fn only_the_controller_may_list_operators() { let req = BridgeRequest::ListOperators; assert_eq!(permit(&req, Some(CONTROLLER), CONTROLLER), Ok(())); for other in ["hive-alpha", "hive-alpha-agent", "swarm-authelia-bridge"] { assert_eq!( permit(&req, Some(other), CONTROLLER), Err(Refusal::Forbidden), "{other} holds an active token but is not the controller" ); } assert_eq!( permit(&req, None, CONTROLLER), Err(Refusal::Forbidden), "a token authelia attributed to no client is not the controller's" ); } /// The control for the test above: the agent verbs stay open to any /// admitted caller, so the refusal there comes from the scoping and not /// from `permit` refusing everyone who is not the controller. #[test] fn the_agent_verbs_stay_open_to_any_active_caller() { for req in [ BridgeRequest::EnsureAgentIdentity { name: "atlas".to_owned(), }, BridgeRequest::ListAgentIdentities, ] { assert_eq!( permit(&req, Some("hive-alpha"), CONTROLLER), Ok(()), "{req:?}" ); assert_eq!(permit(&req, None, CONTROLLER), Ok(()), "{req:?}"); } } #[test] fn a_scoped_refusal_is_403_not_401() { assert_eq!( Refusal::Forbidden.status(), StatusCode::FORBIDDEN, "the token is valid; a 401 would send the caller off to mint a new one" ); } /// A config whose users database holds one operator, `mara`. Every field /// the request path does not read is left empty. fn config_with_one_operator() -> Config { let dir = std::env::temp_dir().join(format!( "swarm-authelia-bridge-respond-{}-{}", std::process::id(), std::time::SystemTime::now() .duration_since(std::time::UNIX_EPOCH) .unwrap() .as_nanos() )); std::fs::create_dir_all(&dir).unwrap(); let users_file = dir.join("users.yml"); std::fs::write( &users_file, "users:\n mara:\n displayname: mara\n password: \"$argon2id$x\"\n groups: [admins]\n", ) .unwrap(); Config { bind: String::new(), users_file, authelia_bin: std::path::PathBuf::new(), introspection_url: String::new(), client_id: String::new(), client_secret: String::new(), operator_reader_client_id: CONTROLLER.to_owned(), operator_group: "admins".to_owned(), } } /// The request path, not only [`permit`]: a dispatch that skipped the /// check would answer the hive below with the operator list. #[tokio::test] async fn the_request_path_answers_the_operator_list_to_the_controller_only() { let config = config_with_one_operator(); let lock = tokio::sync::Mutex::new(()); for caller in [Some("hive-alpha"), None] { let refused = respond(&config, &lock, caller, BridgeRequest::ListOperators).await; assert_eq!(refused.status(), StatusCode::FORBIDDEN, "{caller:?}"); } let answered = respond( &config, &lock, Some(CONTROLLER), BridgeRequest::ListOperators, ) .await; assert_eq!(answered.status(), StatusCode::OK); let body = axum::body::to_bytes(answered.into_body(), usize::MAX) .await .unwrap(); assert_eq!( serde_json::from_slice::(&body).unwrap(), serde_json::json!({"status": "operators", "operators": ["mara"]}) ); let _ = std::fs::remove_dir_all(config.users_file.parent().unwrap()); } }