Compare commits
| Author | SHA1 | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
d39ad6c465 | ||
|
|
f892dc6a19 |
7 changed files with 35 additions and 32 deletions
|
|
@ -193,8 +193,8 @@ in
|
|||
# local reads.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Its own CN, not the reader's: the reader's leaf carries this hive's
|
||||
# name and its policy reads the whole store, while this principal may
|
||||
# only write one path — which is the entire point of giving the
|
||||
# name and its policy reads every agent credential in the swarm, while this
|
||||
# principal may only write one path — which is the entire point of giving the
|
||||
# container an identity instead of lending it the hive's.
|
||||
[ -s ${pkiDir}/matrix-ctl.pem ] || ${signLeaf} ${pkiDir} matrix-ctl \
|
||||
${lib.escapeShellArg deployCfg.bao.matrixCtlCommonName} "" clientAuth
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -45,8 +45,8 @@ let
|
|||
# 🩸 This principal's OWN leaf, not `clientCertFile` — the hive's. Bao
|
||||
# matches a cert-auth role on the CN, so one leaf shared by four readers
|
||||
# would be ONE principal holding the union of four grants: read on
|
||||
# `swarm/agents/*` AND `swarm/hives/<hive>/*` AND `swarm/services/*`, when
|
||||
# this unit reads one queue credential and nothing else. Its own leaf carries
|
||||
# `swarm/agents/*` AND `swarm/hives/<hive>/*`, when this unit reads one
|
||||
# queue credential and nothing else. Its own leaf carries
|
||||
# `<queueAgentCommonNamePrefix>-<hive>` and its role grants the single path
|
||||
# below — still this hive's own, so the narrowing costs no reach.
|
||||
haveClientIdentity =
|
||||
|
|
@ -141,10 +141,10 @@ in
|
|||
a hive that reads the store at all is a hive that needs this pair.
|
||||
|
||||
⚠️ This reader's OWN leaf, not deploy.bao.clientCertFile. That one
|
||||
is the hive's, and its grant reads every secret in the store; this
|
||||
role reads the one queue-credential path. Pointing this option at
|
||||
the hive's leaf would evaluate, deploy and log in — and undo the
|
||||
split.
|
||||
is the hive's, and its grant reads every agent credential in the
|
||||
swarm and this hive's own secrets; this role reads the one
|
||||
queue-credential path. Pointing this option at the hive's leaf
|
||||
would evaluate, deploy and log in — and undo the split.
|
||||
|
||||
On a hive that runs the store, glue-bao-tls.nix supplies both as
|
||||
defaults and there is nothing to do. Elsewhere the leaf is issued
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ in
|
|||
|
||||
⚠️ **Not the hive's own leaf**, and that is the whole deliverable of
|
||||
giving this container an identity: the hive's certificate reads every
|
||||
secret in the store, while this one may write a single path. Pointing
|
||||
agent credential in the swarm, while this one may write a single path. Pointing
|
||||
this at `deploy.bao.clientCertFile` would evaluate, deploy and work —
|
||||
and give away the separation in one line.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -802,12 +802,13 @@ let
|
|||
# 🩸 Each of these reads exactly ONE path in the store, and does it holding
|
||||
# its own leaf rather than `deploy.bao.clientCertFile` — the hive's own leaf,
|
||||
# whose policy (`swarm-secret-client`'s `policy::render`) grants read on
|
||||
# `swarm/agents/*`, `swarm/hives/<hive>/*` AND `swarm/services/*`.
|
||||
# `swarm/agents/*` AND `swarm/hives/<hive>/*`, and nothing under
|
||||
# `swarm/services/`.
|
||||
# Principals presenting one certificate are ONE principal to bao, so sharing
|
||||
# the hive's leaf would leave only the union of what they need expressible:
|
||||
# the unit that fetches Grafana's OIDC client secret could fetch every agent
|
||||
# credential in the swarm, and the unit that fetches this hive's queue
|
||||
# credential could fetch Grafana's.
|
||||
# the hive's leaf would give each of them everything that leaf reads: the
|
||||
# unit that fetches this hive's queue credential could fetch every agent
|
||||
# credential in the swarm, and a unit that fetches a service's OIDC client
|
||||
# secret could not fetch it at all, as that path is not the hive's to read.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Each gets its own leaf, its own cert-auth role and a policy holding the
|
||||
# one `secret/data/…` path that principal's script actually names — spelled
|
||||
|
|
@ -1582,8 +1583,9 @@ in
|
|||
the narrowest of the three: its grant is one path, that
|
||||
credential itself. The point of the whole arrangement is that the
|
||||
process holding the appservice token is not the hive, so handing it
|
||||
the hive's own leaf — which reads every secret in the store — would
|
||||
give the separation away in one line.
|
||||
the hive's own leaf — which reads every agent credential in the swarm
|
||||
and this hive's own secrets — would give the separation away in one
|
||||
line.
|
||||
|
||||
⚠️ Same collision as its siblings, and the same answer: ./swarm.nix
|
||||
feeds this value into the guard on
|
||||
|
|
@ -1885,7 +1887,7 @@ in
|
|||
⚠️ **Not** {option}`services.hyperhive.deploy.bao.clientCertFile`.
|
||||
Pointing this at the hive's own leaf would evaluate, deploy and log in —
|
||||
and hand a unit that reads one credential a certificate that reads every
|
||||
secret in the store.
|
||||
agent credential in the swarm and this hive's own secrets.
|
||||
|
||||
No default here: ./glue-bao-tls.nix points it at the leaf it mints,
|
||||
wherever this host mints its own PKI. A deployment that reads a store on
|
||||
|
|
@ -2281,7 +2283,8 @@ in
|
|||
normally gets both from ./glue-bao-tls.nix.
|
||||
|
||||
⚠️ Not deploy.bao.clientCertFile. That one is the hive's, and its
|
||||
grant reads every secret in the store; this role reads one path.
|
||||
grant reads every agent credential in the swarm and this hive's
|
||||
own secrets; this role reads one path.
|
||||
'';
|
||||
}
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -218,8 +218,8 @@ let
|
|||
# 🩸 Grafana's OWN leaf, not `clientCertFile` — the hive's. Bao matches a
|
||||
# cert-auth role on the CN, so one leaf shared by four readers would be ONE
|
||||
# principal holding the union of four grants: this unit could read every
|
||||
# agent credential in the swarm and every other service's OIDC client
|
||||
# secret, when what it needs is the one path `storeSecretPath` names.
|
||||
# agent credential in the swarm, when what it needs is the one path
|
||||
# `storeSecretPath` names.
|
||||
haveClientIdentity =
|
||||
baoDeploy.grafanaOidcClientCertFile != null && baoDeploy.grafanaOidcClientKeyFile != null;
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -432,10 +432,10 @@ in
|
|||
band, and every other secret comes from the store with it.
|
||||
|
||||
⚠️ Grafana's OWN leaf, not deploy.bao.clientCertFile. That one is the
|
||||
hive's, and its grant reads every secret in the store; this role
|
||||
reads the one path Grafana's client secret lives at. Pointing this
|
||||
option at the hive's leaf would evaluate, deploy and log in — and
|
||||
undo the split.
|
||||
hive's, and its grant reads every agent credential in the swarm and
|
||||
this hive's own secrets; this role reads the one path Grafana's
|
||||
client secret lives at. Pointing this option at the hive's leaf would
|
||||
evaluate, deploy and log in — and undo the split.
|
||||
|
||||
On a hive that runs the store, glue-bao-tls.nix supplies both as
|
||||
defaults and there is nothing to do. Elsewhere the leaf is issued
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -253,8 +253,8 @@ let
|
|||
# 🩸 The collector's OWN leaf, not `clientCertFile` — the hive's. Bao
|
||||
# matches a cert-auth role on the CN, so one leaf shared by four readers
|
||||
# would be ONE principal holding the union of four grants: this unit could
|
||||
# read every agent credential in the swarm and Grafana's OIDC client
|
||||
# secret, when what it needs is the one path `storeSecretPath` names.
|
||||
# read every agent credential in the swarm, when what it needs is the one
|
||||
# path `storeSecretPath` names.
|
||||
haveClientIdentity =
|
||||
baoDeploy.otelOidcClientCertFile != null && baoDeploy.otelOidcClientKeyFile != null;
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -576,10 +576,10 @@ in
|
|||
telemetry. That is not this host.
|
||||
|
||||
⚠️ The collector's OWN leaf, not deploy.bao.clientCertFile. That one
|
||||
is the hive's, and its grant reads every secret in the store; this
|
||||
role reads the one path this collector's client secret lives at.
|
||||
Pointing this option at the hive's leaf would evaluate, deploy and
|
||||
log in — and undo the split.
|
||||
is the hive's, and its grant reads every agent credential in the
|
||||
swarm and this hive's own secrets; this role reads the one path this
|
||||
collector's client secret lives at. Pointing this option at the
|
||||
hive's leaf would evaluate, deploy and log in — and undo the split.
|
||||
|
||||
On a hive that runs the store, glue-bao-tls.nix supplies both as
|
||||
defaults and there is nothing to do. Elsewhere the leaf is issued
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -285,9 +285,9 @@ let
|
|||
# 🩸 The identity separation this whole arrangement buys, stated as the
|
||||
# one thing that would silently undo it. The container gets MATRIX-CTL's
|
||||
# leaf — whose grant is a single path — and not the hive's, which reads
|
||||
# every secret in the store. Both files exist in the same directory and
|
||||
# every agent credential in the swarm and this hive's own secrets. Both files exist in the same directory and
|
||||
# both would evaluate, deploy and work.
|
||||
name = "matrix-ctl presents its own leaf, never the hive's store-wide one";
|
||||
name = "matrix-ctl presents its own leaf, never the hive's";
|
||||
ok =
|
||||
let
|
||||
env =
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue