The responder re-read its secret on any non-2xx introspection answer.
With the re-read backoff added in the previous commit, an IdP outage
(503s, 502s from nginx, 429s) made each re-read find the unchanged
secret, so the delay grew to minutes. A real 401 after the rotation
then landed inside that window, and the responder denied every new
NATS connect until it ran out.
`Answer::Refused` now carries the status. `OidcSecret::introspect`
re-reads only when `stored_secret::is_credential_refusal` says the
status is 400 or 401, the same predicate `ClientSecret::refused` uses on
the client path. Every other non-2xx is a denial with no re-read.
The client-path test for a 429 now runs the mint against a loopback
endpoint answering 429 and 503, instead of calling `refused()` directly.
swarm-queue-client's README no longer names `ClientSecret::Value`.
Part of #5017 (slice Q).
The responder reads its OIDC client secret at
`swarm/services/<client-id>/oidc/client` with the store login it already
opens for the callout keys, and holds it in memory. `--client-secret-file`
is removed.
When introspection answers non-2xx, the responder re-reads the secret from
the store once and, if it changed, retries the introspection once. Both fit
inside the request's 1.5s introspection budget, under the server's 2s
callout timeout: the budget is now one deadline for the whole request. A
re-read that does not finish by then keeps running in the background, the
request is denied, and the next request introspects with what it read. One
re-read runs at a time; a refusal while one runs waits on it.
In swarm-nats.nix the `swarm-bao-nats-auth-oidc` fetch unit, the flag and
the `oidc-client.secret` LoadCredential entry are gone, along with the
unit's policy ordering in glue-bao-readers-policy-order.nix. A tmpfiles `r`
rule removes the copy a container still holds at
/var/lib/nixos-containers/swarm-nats/var/lib/swarm-nats-auth/oidc-client.secret;
nothing reads it.
No policy change: the `swarm-nats-auth` role already reads this path
(`natsAuthReaders` in swarm-bao.nix), which is the role the removed fetch
unit logged in as.
Deploy order: none, and no operator step. The store's grant already exists,
so the queue host can be deployed before, after or without the store's host
and authelia's. Rolling back re-creates the fetch unit and the file; the
store leaf is untouched.
The auth-callout responder learned whether a token was valid, never whose
it was, so every admitted client got the same unscoped grant. Scoping a
grant to one hive's subjects needs an identity to scope it to.
`is_active` becomes `identify_caller` and returns the identity rather
than a boolean: `Ok(Some(client_id))` admits as that client, `Ok(None)`
denies. `active: true` with no `client_id` is a denial, and returning an
identity is what makes that unrepresentable instead of remembered --
there is no admitted-but-unscoped value to construct, so there is no
branch a later edit can forget to handle.
The module deliberately ignores `sub`/`scope`/`exp` on the grounds that
modelling a field implies checking it. That still holds: `active` remains
the whole admission decision, made in one place. `client_id` answers a
different question -- as whom -- and is used downstream of an admission
that has already happened, not as a second gate. The module docs say so,
next to the paragraph that would otherwise argue for deleting the field.
An inactive token has no identity even when the body names one, and an
empty `client_id` counts as absent: it would become a blank component in
a subject the grant is scoped to, which is not a narrower permission but
a different one. The two credential parameters are renamed `own_*` --
this responder's introspection credential is not the caller's identity,
and the function now takes one and returns the other.
The grant itself is still unscoped; narrowing it is the next slice.
Slice 1 shipped the NATS container with an auth_callout block and no
responder, which is the fail-closed state: the server answers
auth_required and admits nobody. This crate is what lets it say yes.
Connects as the callout-exempt user by nkey (never by name - the server
refuses to start if that entry carries a username), subscribes to
$SYS.REQ.USER.AUTH, validates the presented bearer token against
authelia's introspection endpoint, and replies with a signed NATS user
JWT. A denial is a signed response carrying an error, never silence: a
server that hears nothing cannot tell a refusing responder from a dead
one, so staying quiet would turn every rejection into a timeout and hide
an outage inside what looks like ordinary denials.
Everything that is not an explicit active:true denies - network error,
timeout, non-2xx, unparseable body, no token at all. Those are exactly
the conditions under which an attacker would most like this to fall
open. The introspection budget is held under the server's own 2s
auth_callout timeout by a test, since the two numbers live in different
languages in different files.
nats-jwt mints the user JWT. It cannot mint the authorization_response
wrapper - its claim enum is closed and its claims carry no aud, which
the response needs so a reply cannot be replayed at another server in
the cluster - so that half is hand-written, and a test builds a user
token both ways and requires the bytes to match. That is the only
honest basis for trusting the hand-written path on the shape the crate
does not model.
async-nats is taken with default-features off: the default set carries
jetstream, kv, object-store, websockets and service, none of which a
callout responder speaks.
