The controller could not emit an event at all: a reader's grant is
`reader_subjects()`, which is `$JS.API.*` only, so a publish to any event
subject would be refused — and a NATS refusal reaches the client as a
timeout, so the visible symptom would have been a hive that never hears
about a change, with nothing in any log naming a permission.
Adds `swarm_queue_client::events`, following `status::BUCKET`: three
crates must agree on these strings (the controller publishes, a hive
subscribes, the callout responder decides whether the publish is
permitted), and a literal repeated across crates is an agreement nothing
checks. The responder speaks neither jetstream nor kv, so the module is
unconditional and carries no NATS types, exactly as the bucket name is.
The grant takes the wildcard form from the same function the publisher
calls, so the two cannot drift; a separate wildcard constant would have
re-created the disagreement this module exists to prevent.
Tests pin that a reader gets the subject and that a hive does NOT — a
hive able to publish here could tell a neighbour the knowledge repo
changed when it had not, which is an unauthenticated write into someone
else's control path. That one asserts on the subject root rather than a
rendered subject, so a future event leaf fails it too instead of passing
because the test only knew about `knowledge`.
Both assertions mutation-tested: removing the grant fails the reader
test, granting a hive the subject fails the denial test, each on its own
assertion line, and the unmutated tree is green.
