Watch
0
0
Fork
You've already forked hyperhive
0
Commit graph hyperhive/swarm-controller/src/review_classifier
Author SHA1 Message Date
atlas
1b4e764e5c review classifier: run on ACP when the swarm settings choose it
The swarm settings gain `runtime` (`api-key`, the default, or `acp`) and
an `acp` provider record: an https base URL, the provider's model, and
its prices per million tokens. A PUT now changes only the fields its
body names, so the settings form that sends model, effort and limit
leaves the runtime alone; `null` clears `effort` or `acp`. The body stays
strict, and the stored document keeps #5192's lenient read.

The controller sends the runtime in each run request. On `acp` the
classifier runs one prompt on a new `opencode acp` session per
classification through hive-runtime's AcpRuntime, in a scratch
directory, with a config rendered from the settings. opencode runs
`read` and other tools without asking, so OPENCODE_PERMISSION
{"*":"deny"} takes every tool away from the model, and a deny-all policy
refuses any request on top. The title call, which resends the prompt,
is turned off. The deadline cancels the turn, and a turn that does not
end within 15s of that is dropped, which also covers an agent stuck
before its prompt. The answer is the final assistant text, as ACP has
no result event.

The provider key is read per run from
swarm/services/review-classifier/acp-provider, which the bao UI's
admins login may create and update, and reaches opencode through
AcpRuntime::with_provider_key and the trampoline's allowlist.

Each ACP classification's cost is computed from the configured prices
and the reported tokens, and added to
hyperhive.review_classifier.cost.usage labelled repo, pr, model and
currency.

Part of #5096
2026-10-14 10:14:36 +02:00
atlas
c42321ff0e review classifier: escape $ in verdict cells so the forge doesn't render them as math
Forgejo's markdown renders $...$ and $$...$$ as KaTeX; a reason quoting
nix `${...}` put two $ in one cell and the span between them became a KaTeX
parse error. The cell escaper now backslash-escapes $ like its other markup.

Rule source: the math inline parser triggers on '$' and only starts a span
there (modules/markup/markdown/math/inline_parser.go, Trigger/Parse in
go-gitea/gitea, which Forgejo carries); goldmark's CommonMark backslash
escape consumes '\$' first, so the parser never sees it. Escaping each $
also covers '$$'. Backslashes are already escaped, so '\\$' stays literal.
2026-10-13 21:21:21 +02:00
atlas
daaf920e06 review classifier: keep stored runs this build can't decode
A run record this build couldn't decode was dropped from the list it
read, and the next recorded run wrote the list back without it, so a
rollback followed by a roll-forward lost the newer build's runs for
good. The stored list is now a list of entries, each a decoded run or
the raw JSON of one that didn't decode. The route still shows only the
decoded runs. An undecodable entry keeps its place, counts toward the
100, and is written back as it was read. A read that finds any logs one
WARN with their count and the first error.

The settings decode derived its known fields from what
`Settings::default()` serializes, so a later field skipped when unset
would have been stripped from a valid stored document and lost on the
next PUT. The known fields are now an explicit list. A test serializes
a fully populated `Settings`, checks that its keys match the list, and
checks that `decode` round-trips it.
2026-10-13 08:10:51 +02:00
atlas
6f0a72b246 review classifier: recover from a stored record it can't decode
The controller keeps the classifier's newest runs as one JSON array and
its settings as one JSON object, each under one KV key. A document this
build could not decode, as after a rollback past a build that added an
outcome or a settings field, failed every read and every write until
someone deleted the key by hand. A classifier newer than its controller
refused every run request for the missing `model`.

The run store now decodes the array one record at a time: a record that
does not decode is dropped with a WARN naming the bucket, key, index and
error, and a document that is not an array reads as no runs. Listing
keeps working, and the next recorded run writes back only the records
that decoded.

The stored settings ignore a field this build does not know; one that
still does not decode reads as the defaults with a WARN. The PUT body
keeps `deny_unknown_fields`. A PUT now always writes, so a PUT of the
defaults also replaces an undecodable document.

A run request without `model` runs on haiku, the swarm-wide setting's
default, now one constant in swarm-queue-client.

`schedules::read` gains a sibling, `read_with`, taking the decoder.

Closes #5162
2026-10-13 08:10:51 +02:00
atlas
2c5eef73cd review classifier: model, effort and review concurrency as swarm-wide settings
The classifier ran every classification on a hard-coded `haiku` with no
`--effort`, and the controller ran at most two requested reviews at once,
also hard-coded, so changing any of them took a code change and a
redeploy.

swarm-controller now keeps one settings document,
`{model, effort, max_concurrent_reviews}`, in its own
`review-classifier-settings` KV bucket under `all`, the way it keeps the
schedule definitions. No document means today's values: haiku, no
`--effort`, two reviews. `GET /api/review-classifier/settings` reads it;
`PUT` replaces it whole, needs the gateway's `Remote-User` like the
try-out POST, and refuses a bad model (the inference route's check), an
effort outside the five levels or a limit outside 1..=8 with
problem+json 400.

Every run request (try-out and requested review) now carries the model
and effort, and the classifier passes them to claude instead of its
constant, which is gone. A try-out reads the settings when it is posted;
a review reads them for the limit before it waits for a place and again
for the model and effort once it has one. The review semaphore is
replaced by a running count under a resizable limit, so a PUT, or the
next review's read, changes how many run without a restart, and a lower
limit lets the runs already going finish. MAX_WAITING_REVIEWS is
unchanged.

Closes #5151, part of #5096.
2026-10-13 01:45:19 +02:00
atlas
2fc0166427 swarm-controller: record the review classifier's runs and list them
Every run is recorded when it ends: a try-out when its reply settles it,
a requested review once its review is posted or the post fails, and a
request turned away by a full queue once its comment is posted. A
duplicate request that starts nothing is not recorded. The newest 100
are one JSON array under `recent` in a new controller-owned KV bucket,
`review-classifier-runs`, written with compare-and-set as
`schedule-definitions` is (five attempts). A failed write is logged; the
review is already posted by then.

Each recorded run is also one info event, "review classifier run
finished", with the record's fields as tracing fields. The controller
logs natively to the journal, so they reach VictoriaLogs as F_<NAME>.

GET /api/review-classifier/runs returns the list, newest first, gated
by the gateway like the try-out GET. post_classifier_review now returns
the posted review's html_url, which the record keeps as review_url.

Closes #5153, part of #5096.
2026-10-12 21:48:51 +02:00
atlas
60ea7fdc04 swarm-controller: harden the review classifier's real reviews
Follow-ups from the review of #5142.

A `Done` answer with fewer or more rows than the classifications sent, or
none, now posts the no-verdict comment instead of the classifier's overall
verdict, so a short answer can't approve.

Requests are accepted per repo, PR and head into a set bounded at the two
running plus eight waiting. A request for a key already running or waiting
starts nothing and logs at info; a request with every place taken starts no
run and posts a no-verdict comment saying so. Before, every delivery spawned
a task waiting on the semaphore, so toggling the review request queued one
paid run per toggle.

Table cells get a zero-width space after `#`, `!`, `://` and `www.`, so a
model's reason can't render an issue or PR reference or a bare URL as a link.

The secret publisher's policy denies the classifier's forge token leaf, the
way #5139 denied Grafana's admin password, with a module-eval-bao-grants arm
pinning it. The controller posts reviews with whatever token is there, so a
publisher write picked the account reviews come from.

Closes #5143, part of #5096.
2026-10-12 18:38:05 +02:00
atlas
a669cd96b6 swarm-controller: post the review classifier's verdict on a review request
Requesting the forge account `review-classifier` as a reviewer now runs the
repo's rules against the PR and posts the result as that account's review,
on the head commit the run read. A push starts no run; only a fresh review
request does.

- An instance-wide `pull_request_review_request` system hook delivers to
  `/webhook/forge/review-request`. A request for any other reviewer, or a
  removed request, does nothing.
- The controller reads the PR, loads the rules with the same reader as
  `GET /api/review-classifier/rules`, sends one request on the try-out
  subject, and posts APPROVED or REQUEST_CHANGES with the table as the body.
- With no clean verdict (PR or rules don't load, the run fails, or any
  classification has no answer) it posts a COMMENT saying why, never an
  approval. The event is one function, `no_clean_verdict_event`.
- Table cells are flattened, markup-escaped, and every `@` gets a
  zero-width space, so a model's reason can't break the table or mention
  anyone.
- At most two requested reviews run at once; the rest wait in memory.
- The account is minted the way hive accounts are: a five-minute pass
  queues a `MintClassifierForgeToken` node when the token at
  `swarm/services/review-classifier/forge/token` is missing or stale. The
  token is `write:repository`. The controller's bao policy gains that leaf
  (create/read/update), pinned in module-eval bao-grants. The classifier
  never sees the token.

The account gets no repo access automatically; a repo admin adds it by
hand. A re-request retires the account's earlier review: Forgejo clears
`official` on a reviewer's earlier reviews when it is requested again
(models/issues/review.go AddReviewRequest, v16.0.5), and approvals and
rejection blocks count official reviews only.

Refs #5137
2026-10-12 16:11:50 +02:00