One commit rather than two because they are not independent: the UI's
`enable` had the controller's as its literal default, so moving the
controller alone would leave the UI's default naming an option that no
longer exists.
The UI keeps that derivation in its new home — it is a view onto the
controller's state and reaches it over that daemon's unix socket, so the
host running the controller is the host that can serve it.
Three spellings had to move together for the UI, not one: the `default`,
the `defaultText` shown in the options doc, and the description prose
that names the old path in words. A grep for the option path finds the
first two.
The sweep also reached outside nix: `swarm-controller`'s crate README and
its `//!` module doc both named the option, as did this repo's own
CLAUDE.md and four pages under docs/. An option's name is API, and its
documentation lives wherever someone thought to write it down.
Six places asserted the old design as fact, and none of them mention the
change by name -- the class of doc breakage that is found by asking what
a diff made untrue, not by grepping for a feature:
- swarmctl/README.md and swarm-authelia-bridge/README.md both described
their own private canonical store. The bridge's "known limitation"
section described the seam as unsolved; it is what this fixes, so it
becomes what both writers must uphold instead.
- docs/swarm/{sso,ui,secrets}.md described a rendered artifact.
- The repo CLAUDE.md entry for swarmctl said the same.
- docs/tools/swarmctl-cli.md is regenerated (CI diffs it against the
clap tree), picking up the removed --store flag.
Operator-facing where it is read: the hand-editing consequence (values
survive a rewrite, comments do not) is stated in sso.md, where an
operator is being told to edit the file, rather than only in a module doc.
Single 🔗 button in the Shell header (direction 1 of 3 proposed on the
issue) — one fixed element regardless of link count, so it can't
clutter as the list grows, and visible on every route since Shell
wraps all of them. Opens a popover listing whatever GET /api/links
returns (icon + label, opens in a new tab); hidden entirely when the
list is empty, same "don't render a dead affordance" rule the old
dashboard's H0M3 tiles follow for Forge/Matrix.
Docs: docs/swarm/ui.md gets a short section on the feature + the
contribute-your-own-entry idiom.
Verified: npm run build + npm run typecheck clean, headless-chromium
screenshots of both the closed and (temporarily forced open for the
screenshot only) open states, pixel-sampled to confirm the popover is
actually using the dark theme vars and not just looking that way in a
downscaled preview.
Per mara on the PR: the guide someone follows on a fresh deploy is a
different page from the one they read while debugging, and only the
second existed.
Also fixes a contradiction the request surfaced: setup.md and
swarm/sso.md have told every operator to create '--group admins' since
the bootstrap step existed, while the new rule required 'operators'.
This is the first rule that CONSUMES a group name, so it takes the one
the guide already creates - inventing a second would have meant every
account made by following the guide silently failing the check it was
supposed to pass, and for mara specifically a migration step that now
may not be needed at all.
setup.md's step 3 says why --group is not decoration; the new step 4
says what decides whether the page opens (the group, and the name
resolving) rather than listing a command, because there is nothing to
run. Steps renumbered, including the matrix block's internal 4a-4e.
New docs/swarm/ui.md (split-page shape, per the docs rule), linked from
the swarm README and added to the gateway's vhost map.
Leads with the step that separates 'protected' from 'locked out':
swarmctl user add <you> --group operators. auth_request asks whether
there is a session; the access_control rule is what makes it mean
operator, and an account created before the rule existed has no groups.
Also records the four wiring sites a swarm service name needs, with the
certificate one called out - serviceDomains is both the sub-CA's
nameConstraints set and the leaf's SANs, and the apex is a sibling of
the other three rather than a parent, so nothing issues for it
implicitly.
