Every admitted client got the same unrestricted grant, so any hive could
write any other hive's status key. The responder now derives a
permission set from the caller's identity and mints it into the user
JWT.
A hive may publish to its own KV key and the two JetStream subjects
needed to reach it; the controller may list and fetch every key and
write none; anything else is denied outright. Deny is the default
because every other shape fails open, and silently: a client that
matched no rule and kept the old grant would make the policy advisory.
The subject sets are measured rather than reasoned about, and two of
them are counter-intuitive. `$KV.<bucket>.<key>` alone does not let a
client write that key, because the client resolves the bucket first. And
`$JS.API.>` is not "the JetStream permission": it also covers
`$JS.API.STREAM.DELETE`, with which a hive correctly refused on a
neighbour's key can delete the whole bucket and every hive's data with
it. Granting it would have made per-key scoping decorative, so the
subjects are named individually and a test asserts the wildcard does not
come back as a convenience.
Minimality is by removal: each subject was dropped in turn to confirm
the client breaks without it. That is not pedantry — an additive search
had called a set minimal while two of its five subjects were never
needed, which ships an unnecessary grant with a measurement attached
making it look earned.
Both grants include `STREAM.CREATE` on the one named stream, because
`status::open_or_create` is called by both ends: either may arrive first
on a fresh swarm, and without it a new swarm never gets a bucket at all.
`CREATE` is not `UPDATE`, so a second arrival cannot reshape the bucket
the first one made.
`status::BUCKET` moves out from behind the `kv` feature so this
responder can share it. The name is a `&str` with no dependencies and
only `open_or_create` needs JetStream; gating the name forced a third
consumer to choose between a stack it does not use and a copied literal,
and the copied literal is exactly the disagreement that module exists to
prevent.
Only publish is scoped. Subscription permissions are unrestricted and
unmeasured, and the module docs say so rather than implying a property
nothing established.
Per mara on the PR: all deps go into workspace level so versions stay
consistent. async-nats, data-encoding, nkeys and nats-jwt are new
[workspace.dependencies] entries; sha2 and futures-util now come from
there.
The crate had asked for sha2 0.10 while the workspace standard is 0.11,
and for the futures facade where the workspace carries futures-util. Both
resolved without adding a Cargo.lock entry - each was already in the tree
via something else - so the drift was invisible in the lock and would only
have surfaced as two versions of a hashing crate in one binary.
The responder answered granted=true and the server still refused every
client:
Error non operator mode account "AUTH": attempted to use issuer_account
nats_jwt::Token::new_user always sets issuer_account, which is an
operator-mode field naming the account when a signing key rather than the
account identity key signed the token. In server-config mode - what this
module renders - its mere presence is fatal, and the account is named by
the claims' aud instead.
nats-jwt can express neither aud nor the omission, so the user JWT is now
hand-built by the same signer as the response wrapper, and nats-jwt moves
to dev-dependencies as the encoder's test oracle.
Every unit test passed throughout: they assert fields that must be
present, and the defect was a field that must be absent.
Slice 1 shipped the NATS container with an auth_callout block and no
responder, which is the fail-closed state: the server answers
auth_required and admits nobody. This crate is what lets it say yes.
Connects as the callout-exempt user by nkey (never by name - the server
refuses to start if that entry carries a username), subscribes to
$SYS.REQ.USER.AUTH, validates the presented bearer token against
authelia's introspection endpoint, and replies with a signed NATS user
JWT. A denial is a signed response carrying an error, never silence: a
server that hears nothing cannot tell a refusing responder from a dead
one, so staying quiet would turn every rejection into a timeout and hide
an outage inside what looks like ordinary denials.
Everything that is not an explicit active:true denies - network error,
timeout, non-2xx, unparseable body, no token at all. Those are exactly
the conditions under which an attacker would most like this to fall
open. The introspection budget is held under the server's own 2s
auth_callout timeout by a test, since the two numbers live in different
languages in different files.
nats-jwt mints the user JWT. It cannot mint the authorization_response
wrapper - its claim enum is closed and its claims carry no aud, which
the response needs so a reply cannot be replayed at another server in
the cluster - so that half is hand-written, and a test builds a user
token both ways and requires the bytes to match. That is the only
honest basis for trusting the hand-written path on the shape the crate
does not model.
async-nats is taken with default-features off: the default set carries
jetstream, kv, object-store, websockets and service, none of which a
callout responder speaks.
