docs: clarify dynamic colour derivation still traces to base16
Per mara's follow-up: the doc shouldn't read as 'no dynamic colour at all' — mixing/lighter/darker derivation is fine and matches Material's own approach, the constraint is that every derived colour still traces back to the base16/stylix contract, not an independent source.
This commit is contained in:
parent
61b7bb4b4d
commit
f0c362b688
1 changed files with 4 additions and 3 deletions
|
|
@ -32,9 +32,10 @@ repeated here.
|
||||||
model selector living in a three-dot overflow menu instead of next to
|
model selector living in a three-dot overflow menu instead of next to
|
||||||
the thing that shows the current model.
|
the thing that shows the current model.
|
||||||
- Loosely influenced by Material Design's current (Material You)
|
- Loosely influenced by Material Design's current (Material You)
|
||||||
generation, mainly for shape/elevation ideas — colour theming is
|
generation, mainly for shape/elevation ideas. Colour is dynamic too —
|
||||||
governed entirely by the base16/stylix contract below, not Material's
|
auto-derived shades (mixing, lighter/darker) are fair game, same as
|
||||||
dynamic-colour system.
|
Material's own approach — but every derived colour still traces back
|
||||||
|
to the base16/stylix contract below, never an independent source.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Motion
|
## Motion
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue