refactor(#2449): write power intent via a SetWanted DAG node, not a pre-submit side effect

The durable 'wanted' power intent was written by submit::{start,stop,
restart,graceful_restart,graceful_stop} as a synchronous pre-submit side
effect, then read by the DAG's tail Reconcile. That's not crash-safe
(a crash between the write and the enqueue loses it) and, with agent now
per-node, can't be per-agent in a DAG that spans agents.

Move it into the DAG as a head SetWanted node:
- NodeKind::SetWanted { up } + run_set_wanted executor (fails the node on
  a write error, unlike the old warn-and-continue, so a stale intent
  never reaches Reconcile).
- LEASE-NEEDING, not lease-exempt: it takes the agent lease so a power-op
  DAG's intent-write + reconcile is atomic per-agent. If it were exempt,
  two racing ops (restart vs stop) would run both intent-writes up front
  and clobber each other before either reconciled — defeating the point
  of moving the write into the DAG. (In stale_start the lease is thus held
  across the head Prebuild, but that's a no-op there: the agent is down so
  prebuild is skipped.)
- templates: explicit SetWanted node 0 on restart/graceful_restart/
  graceful_stop, plus dedicated start/stop templates (SetWanted -> Reconcile)
  and stale_start (SetWanted(Up) -> rebuild subgraph, reusing rebuild_nodes).
  No compose helper / rebuild variant. reconcile_only is now boot-only.
- submit.rs: drop the set_wanted side effect; the stale-rev shape decision
  (start vs stale_start) stays submit-side.

All 33 job_queue tests pass (shape/lease tests updated for the head node).

hive-c0re/src/job_queue/exec.rs

@@ -98,9 +98,31 @@ pub(super) async fn run_node(coord: &Arc<Coordinator>, claim: &Claim) -> Result<
         // A pure grouping anchor (boot root): no work, completes immediately so
         // its child DAGs settle it and the boot tree resolves.
         NodeKind::Noop => Ok(NodeOutput::default()),
+        NodeKind::SetWanted { up } => run_set_wanted(coord, claim, *up),
     }
 }
 
+/// Write the agent's durable power intent — the DAG-node form of the old
+/// pre-submit `set_wanted` side effect. Store-only (no container touch), so
+/// build-slot-exempt; but it takes the agent's lifecycle lease (see
+/// `NodeKind::needs_lease`) so the whole power-op DAG is atomic per-agent.
+/// The downstream `Reconcile` reads the intent this writes. Unlike the old
+/// warn-and-continue write, a failed write fails the node (cancel-downstream
+/// cancels the `Reconcile`) rather than letting it converge to a stale
+/// intent — that atomicity is the point of moving it into the DAG.
+fn run_set_wanted(coord: &Arc<Coordinator>, claim: &Claim, up: bool) -> Result<NodeOutput> {
+    let wanted = if up {
+        crate::power::Wanted::Up
+    } else {
+        crate::power::Wanted::Offline
+    };
+    coord
+        .power
+        .set(&claim.agent, wanted)
+        .with_context(|| format!("set wanted={} for agent {}", wanted.as_str(), claim.agent))?;
+    Ok(NodeOutput::default())
+}
+
 /// Out-of-band toplevel build while the container keeps serving: meta
 /// sync + optional per-agent relock, then warm
 /// `system.build.toplevel` so the later `Swap` hits cache and skips

hive-c0re/src/job_queue/model.rs

@@ -121,6 +121,20 @@ pub enum NodeKind {
     /// dashboard. Holds no lease and no build slot; the child DAGs it anchors
     /// still run concurrently — the grouping is a display link, not a dep edge.
     Noop,
+    /// Write the agent's durable power intent (`wanted = Up` when `up`, else
+    /// `Offline`) as a first-class DAG node, at the head of a power-op
+    /// template so the downstream `Reconcile` reads it. Replaces the old
+    /// pre-submit `set_wanted` side effect: the intent write is now part of
+    /// the atomic DAG (crash-safe, per-agent — a multi-agent DAG carries one
+    /// `SetWanted` per agent). Build-slot-exempt (a store write), but
+    /// **lease-needing**: it takes the agent's lifecycle lease so the whole
+    /// power-op DAG (intent write → reconcile) is atomic per-agent — two
+    /// racing ops (e.g. restart vs stop) can't clobber each other's intent
+    /// before either reconciles, which is the point of moving the write into
+    /// the DAG. (In `stale_start` the lease is thus held across the head
+    /// `Prebuild`, but that's a no-op there — the agent is down, so prebuild
+    /// is skipped.)
+    SetWanted { up: bool },
 }
 
 impl NodeKind {
@@ -142,6 +156,7 @@ impl NodeKind {
             NodeKind::WritePermFile => "write_perm_file",
             NodeKind::ApprovalDeploy => "approval_deploy",
             NodeKind::Noop => "noop",
+            NodeKind::SetWanted { .. } => "set_wanted",
         }
     }
 
@@ -177,6 +192,7 @@ impl NodeKind {
                 | NodeKind::Drain
                 | NodeKind::WriteDropin
                 | NodeKind::ApprovalDeploy
+                | NodeKind::SetWanted { .. }
         )
     }
 }

hive-c0re/src/job_queue/submit.rs

@@ -1,16 +1,15 @@
 //! Request-level submit API — the surface the dashboard POST handlers,
-//! the MCP socket handlers, and `hivectl` paths call. Owns the
-//! submit-time side effects the DAG templates deliberately don't:
-//! writing the durable `wanted` power intent (synchronously,
-//! last-writer-wins) before the DAG whose `Reconcile` reads it, and
-//! upgrading a stale start to a full rebuild. Every helper emits a
-//! fresh queue snapshot so the dashboard shows the new DAG immediately.
+//! the MCP socket handlers, and `hivectl` paths call. The durable
+//! `wanted` power intent is now written by a `SetWanted` DAG node at the
+//! head of each power-op template (not a pre-submit side effect); the
+//! only submit-time logic left is the stale-start *shape* decision
+//! (`start` vs `stale_start`). Every helper emits a fresh queue snapshot
+//! so the dashboard shows the new DAG immediately.
 
 use std::sync::Arc;
 
-use super::{Source, Template, templates};
+use super::{Source, templates};
 use crate::coordinator::Coordinator;
-use crate::power::Wanted;
 
 fn submit_and_emit(coord: &Arc<Coordinator>, spec: super::DagSpec) -> u64 {
     let id = coord
@@ -21,12 +20,6 @@ fn submit_and_emit(coord: &Arc<Coordinator>, spec: super::DagSpec) -> u64 {
     id
 }
 
-fn set_wanted(coord: &Arc<Coordinator>, agent: &str, wanted: Wanted) {
-    if let Err(e) = coord.power.set(agent, wanted) {
-        tracing::warn!(%agent, wanted = wanted.as_str(), error = ?e, "agent_power: set failed");
-    }
-}
-
 /// Manual/approval-independent rebuild (always relocks the agent's
 /// meta input — cascade children are built by the scheduler's fan-out
 /// instead of this surface).
@@ -35,20 +28,20 @@ pub fn rebuild(coord: &Arc<Coordinator>, agent: &str, source: Source, reason: St
 }
 
 /// Restart: mechanical stop + converge to `wanted = Up`. The intent
-/// write matters when `wanted` drifted `Offline` under a running
-/// agent — the old `kill + start` always ended up, and an operator
-/// asking for a restart plainly wants it running, not a stop.
+/// write is the template's head `SetWanted(Up)` node — it matters when
+/// `wanted` drifted `Offline` under a running agent (an operator asking
+/// for a restart plainly wants it running, not a stop).
 pub fn restart(coord: &Arc<Coordinator>, agent: &str, source: Source, reason: String) -> u64 {
-    set_wanted(coord, agent, Wanted::Up);
     submit_and_emit(coord, templates::restart(agent, source, reason))
 }
 
-/// Start: persist `wanted = Up`, then reconcile. A stale rev marker
-/// upgrades the start to a full rebuild (whose tail `Reconcile` does
-/// the start) so the container always comes up on current derivations
-/// — the old fast-lane `run_start` upgrade, moved to submit time.
+/// Start: `SetWanted(Up)` (a DAG node now) then reconcile. A stale rev
+/// marker upgrades the start to a rebuild-then-start (`stale_start`, whose
+/// tail `Reconcile` does the start) so the container always comes up on
+/// current derivations — the old fast-lane `run_start` upgrade, still a
+/// submit-time *shape* decision (which template), while the intent write
+/// itself is now the template's head node.
 pub fn start(coord: &Arc<Coordinator>, agent: &str, source: Source, reason: String) -> u64 {
-    set_wanted(coord, agent, Wanted::Up);
     let stored = std::fs::read_to_string(crate::paths::applied_rev_marker(agent)).ok();
     let stale = crate::auto_update::current_flake_rev(&coord.hyperhive_flake)
         .is_some_and(|rev| stored.as_deref() != Some(rev.as_str()));
@@ -56,60 +49,34 @@ pub fn start(coord: &Arc<Coordinator>, agent: &str, source: Source, reason: Stri
         tracing::info!(%agent, "start: rev stale — upgrading to rebuild+start");
         return submit_and_emit(
             coord,
-            templates::rebuild(
-                agent,
-                source,
-                format!("{reason} (stale — rebuild+start)"),
-                None,
-                true,
-            ),
+            templates::stale_start(agent, source, format!("{reason} (stale — rebuild+start)")),
         );
     }
-    submit_and_emit(
-        coord,
-        templates::reconcile_only(
-            Template::Start,
-            agent,
-            source,
-            reason,
-            Some(crate::coordinator::TransientKind::Starting),
-        ),
-    )
+    submit_and_emit(coord, templates::start(agent, source, reason))
 }
 
-/// Hard stop: persist `wanted = Offline`, then reconcile (kill +
+/// Hard stop: `SetWanted(Offline)` (a DAG node now) then reconcile (kill +
 /// unregister + `Killed` event).
 pub fn stop(coord: &Arc<Coordinator>, agent: &str, source: Source, reason: String) -> u64 {
-    set_wanted(coord, agent, Wanted::Offline);
-    submit_and_emit(
-        coord,
-        templates::reconcile_only(
-            Template::Stop,
-            agent,
-            source,
-            reason,
-            Some(crate::coordinator::TransientKind::Stopping),
-        ),
-    )
+    submit_and_emit(coord, templates::stop(agent, source, reason))
 }
 
-/// Graceful stop: persist `wanted = Offline`, then signal → drain →
-/// reconcile (the actual stop).
+/// Graceful stop: signal → drain → reconcile (the actual stop). The head
+/// `SetWanted(Offline)` node writes the intent as part of the DAG.
 pub fn graceful_stop(coord: &Arc<Coordinator>, agent: &str, source: Source, reason: String) -> u64 {
-    set_wanted(coord, agent, Wanted::Offline);
     submit_and_emit(coord, templates::graceful_stop(agent, source, reason))
 }
 
-/// Graceful restart: persist `wanted = Up`, then signal → drain →
-/// mechanical stop → reconcile (starts it back up) — one atomic DAG,
-/// no client-side "await the stop DAG then submit a start DAG" split.
+/// Graceful restart: signal → drain → mechanical stop → reconcile (starts
+/// it back up) — one atomic DAG, no client-side "await the stop DAG then
+/// submit a start DAG" split. The head `SetWanted(Up)` node writes the
+/// intent as part of the DAG.
 pub fn graceful_restart(
     coord: &Arc<Coordinator>,
     agent: &str,
     source: Source,
     reason: String,
 ) -> u64 {
-    set_wanted(coord, agent, Wanted::Up);
     submit_and_emit(coord, templates::graceful_restart(agent, source, reason))
 }
 

hive-c0re/src/job_queue/templates.rs

@@ -8,14 +8,19 @@
 //! are single-agent (every node shares one agent); a future multi-agent
 //! template would stamp different agents per subgraph.
 //!
+//! The power ops write the durable `wanted` intent via a head
+//! `SetWanted(w)` node (not a pre-submit side effect); it holds the agent
+//! lease so intent+reconcile is atomic per-agent.
+//!
 //! ```text
 //! rebuild(a):        Prebuild(a) → StopForUpdate(a) → Swap(a) →(any) Reconcile(a)
-//! graceful-stop(a):  [wanted=Offline]  Signal(a) → Drain(a) → Reconcile(a)
-//! restart(a):        [wanted=Up]       StopForUpdate(a) → Reconcile(a)
-//! graceful-restart(a): [wanted=Up]     Signal(a) → Drain(a) → StopForUpdate(a) → Reconcile(a)
-//! start(a):          [wanted=Up]       Reconcile(a)
-//! stop(a):           [wanted=Offline]  Reconcile(a)
-//! spawn(a):          [wanted=Up]  Provision(a) → Create(a) → WriteDropin(a) → Reconcile(a)
+//! graceful-stop(a):  SetWanted(a,Off) → Signal(a) → Drain(a) → Reconcile(a)
+//! restart(a):        SetWanted(a,Up) → StopForUpdate(a) → Reconcile(a)
+//! graceful-restart(a): SetWanted(a,Up) → Signal(a) → Drain(a) → StopForUpdate(a) → Reconcile(a)
+//! start(a):          SetWanted(a,Up) → Reconcile(a)
+//! stop(a):           SetWanted(a,Off) → Reconcile(a)
+//! stale-start(a):    SetWanted(a,Up) → «rebuild subgraph»   (rev stale; prebuild noops, agent down)
+//! spawn(a):          Provision(a) → Create(a) → WriteDropin(a) → Reconcile(a)  [wanted=Up at approve]
 //! perm-change(a):    WritePermFile(a) → «rebuild subgraph»
 //! meta-update(inp):  MetaLock(inp) → «fan-out rebuild(a) per affected a»
 //! startup sweep:     MetaLock(hyperhive, non-fatal) → «fan-out rebuild(stale a)»
@@ -117,10 +122,11 @@ pub fn approval_deploy(agent: &str, approval_id: i64, reason: String) -> DagSpec
 
 /// Graceful stop: cheap `Signal` fires immediately (no build slot), the
 /// `Drain` awaits the harness checkpoint (bounded), and the tail
-/// `Reconcile` performs the actual container stop — the caller sets
-/// `wanted = Offline` at submit time. A whole-hive graceful stop
-/// therefore signals every agent up front and overlaps every drain,
-/// replacing the old detached-watcher thread structurally.
+/// `Reconcile` performs the actual container stop. The head `SetWanted`
+/// node writes `wanted = Offline` as part of the DAG (was a pre-submit
+/// side effect). A whole-hive graceful stop therefore signals every agent
+/// up front and overlaps every drain, replacing the old detached-watcher
+/// thread structurally.
 pub fn graceful_stop(agent: &str, source: Source, reason: String) -> DagSpec {
     DagSpec {
         template: Template::GracefulStop,
@@ -132,16 +138,17 @@ pub fn graceful_stop(agent: &str, source: Source, reason: String) -> DagSpec {
         perm_payload: None,
         transient: Some(TransientKind::Stopping),
         nodes: vec![
-            node(agent, NodeKind::Signal, Vec::new()),
-            node(agent, NodeKind::Drain, after_ok(0)),
-            node(agent, NodeKind::Reconcile, after_ok(1)),
+            node(agent, NodeKind::SetWanted { up: false }, Vec::new()),
+            node(agent, NodeKind::Signal, after_ok(0)),
+            node(agent, NodeKind::Drain, after_ok(1)),
+            node(agent, NodeKind::Reconcile, after_ok(2)),
         ],
     }
 }
 
-/// Restart: mechanical stop, then converge to `wanted` — the submit
-/// layer writes `wanted = Up` first, so this is a stop + start like
-/// the old `lifecycle::restart` regardless of prior intent drift.
+/// Restart: write `wanted = Up` (head `SetWanted` node), mechanical stop,
+/// then converge — a stop + start like the old `lifecycle::restart`
+/// regardless of prior intent drift.
 pub fn restart(agent: &str, source: Source, reason: String) -> DagSpec {
     DagSpec {
         template: Template::Restart,
@@ -153,20 +160,20 @@ pub fn restart(agent: &str, source: Source, reason: String) -> DagSpec {
         perm_payload: None,
         transient: Some(TransientKind::Restarting),
         nodes: vec![
-            node(agent, NodeKind::StopForUpdate, Vec::new()),
-            node(agent, NodeKind::Reconcile, after_ok(0)),
+            node(agent, NodeKind::SetWanted { up: true }, Vec::new()),
+            node(agent, NodeKind::StopForUpdate, after_ok(0)),
+            node(agent, NodeKind::Reconcile, after_ok(1)),
         ],
     }
 }
 
-/// Graceful restart: signal → drain → mechanical stop → converge to
-/// `wanted` — the caller writes `wanted = Up` first, same as `restart`.
-/// One atomic DAG start to finish (no client- or server-side "submit
-/// one DAG, await it, submit the next" composition): the `Drain` node
-/// is the same bounded harness-checkpoint wait `graceful_stop` uses,
-/// then `StopForUpdate` (mechanical, ignores `wanted`) and the tail
-/// `Reconcile` (converges to `wanted = Up`, i.e. starts it back up)
-/// chain exactly like `restart`'s tail.
+/// Graceful restart: write `wanted = Up` (head `SetWanted`), signal →
+/// drain → mechanical stop → converge. One atomic DAG start to finish
+/// (no client- or server-side "submit one DAG, await it, submit the next"
+/// composition): the `Drain` node is the same bounded harness-checkpoint
+/// wait `graceful_stop` uses, then `StopForUpdate` (mechanical, ignores
+/// `wanted`) and the tail `Reconcile` (converges to `wanted = Up`, i.e.
+/// starts it back up) chain exactly like `restart`'s tail.
 pub fn graceful_restart(agent: &str, source: Source, reason: String) -> DagSpec {
     DagSpec {
         template: Template::GracefulRestart,
@@ -178,16 +185,19 @@ pub fn graceful_restart(agent: &str, source: Source, reason: String) -> DagSpec
         perm_payload: None,
         transient: Some(TransientKind::Restarting),
         nodes: vec![
-            node(agent, NodeKind::Signal, Vec::new()),
-            node(agent, NodeKind::Drain, after_ok(0)),
-            node(agent, NodeKind::StopForUpdate, after_ok(1)),
-            node(agent, NodeKind::Reconcile, after_ok(2)),
+            node(agent, NodeKind::SetWanted { up: true }, Vec::new()),
+            node(agent, NodeKind::Signal, after_ok(0)),
+            node(agent, NodeKind::Drain, after_ok(1)),
+            node(agent, NodeKind::StopForUpdate, after_ok(2)),
+            node(agent, NodeKind::Reconcile, after_ok(3)),
         ],
     }
 }
 
-/// Single-`Reconcile` DAG: `Start` / `Stop` (caller writes `wanted`
-/// first) and the boot-time `Reconcile` converge (wanted untouched).
+/// Boot-time reconcile: a single `Reconcile` node that converges observed
+/// power state to the persisted intent — `wanted` is untouched (no
+/// `SetWanted`), unlike the operator `start`/`stop` templates. Used only
+/// by the boot sweep now.
 pub fn reconcile_only(
     template: Template,
     agent: &str,
@@ -208,6 +218,68 @@ pub fn reconcile_only(
     }
 }
 
+/// Start: write `wanted = Up` (head `SetWanted`), then reconcile (which
+/// starts the container). The intent write is a DAG node now, not a
+/// pre-submit side effect.
+pub fn start(agent: &str, source: Source, reason: String) -> DagSpec {
+    DagSpec {
+        template: Template::Start,
+        source,
+        reason,
+        parent_id: None,
+        approval_id: None,
+        inputs: Vec::new(),
+        perm_payload: None,
+        transient: Some(TransientKind::Starting),
+        nodes: vec![
+            node(agent, NodeKind::SetWanted { up: true }, Vec::new()),
+            node(agent, NodeKind::Reconcile, after_ok(0)),
+        ],
+    }
+}
+
+/// Stop: write `wanted = Offline` (head `SetWanted`), then reconcile
+/// (kill + unregister + `Killed` event).
+pub fn stop(agent: &str, source: Source, reason: String) -> DagSpec {
+    DagSpec {
+        template: Template::Stop,
+        source,
+        reason,
+        parent_id: None,
+        approval_id: None,
+        inputs: Vec::new(),
+        perm_payload: None,
+        transient: Some(TransientKind::Stopping),
+        nodes: vec![
+            node(agent, NodeKind::SetWanted { up: false }, Vec::new()),
+            node(agent, NodeKind::Reconcile, after_ok(0)),
+        ],
+    }
+}
+
+/// Stale start: a `start` whose rev marker is stale, so it rebuilds
+/// before coming up — `SetWanted(Up)` → «rebuild subgraph» → `Reconcile`
+/// (the rebuild's tail `Reconcile` starts it, since `wanted = Up`). The
+/// rebuild nodes are the same `rebuild_nodes` chain a manual rebuild uses
+/// (reused, not a variant); only the leading `SetWanted(Up)` intent
+/// differs. Shows as a `Rebuild` on the dashboard like the old
+/// submit-time upgrade did.
+pub fn stale_start(agent: &str, source: Source, reason: String) -> DagSpec {
+    let mut nodes = vec![node(agent, NodeKind::SetWanted { up: true }, Vec::new())];
+    nodes.extend(rebuild_nodes(agent, true, 1));
+    DagSpec {
+        template: Template::Rebuild,
+        source,
+        reason,
+        parent_id: None,
+        approval_id: None,
+        inputs: Vec::new(),
+        perm_payload: None,
+        transient: Some(TransientKind::Rebuilding),
+        nodes,
+    }
+}
+
 /// First-deploy spawn (approval-driven): `Provision` (proposed/applied
 /// repos, state subvolume, meta registration) then `Create`
 /// (`nixos-container create`), drop-in write, then `Reconcile` starts

hive-c0re/src/job_queue/tests.rs

@@ -212,21 +212,27 @@ fn lease_serializes_two_lifecycle_dags_for_same_agent() {
             None,
         ),
     );
-    // Restart's StopForUpdate acquires the lease; stop's Reconcile
-    // must wait even though slots are free.
+    // Restart's head SetWanted takes the lease; stop's Reconcile must
+    // wait even though slots are free.
     let first = claim_one(&q);
     assert_eq!(first.dag_id, restart);
+    assert_eq!(first.kind.as_str(), "set_wanted");
     assert!(first.lease_acquired);
     q.complete_node(restart, first.node_id, Ok(()));
-    // Same DAG keeps the lease for its Reconcile.
+    // Same DAG keeps the lease through StopForUpdate then Reconcile.
     let second = claim_one(&q);
     assert_eq!(second.dag_id, restart);
+    assert_eq!(second.kind.as_str(), "stop_for_update");
     assert!(!second.lease_acquired, "lease already held by this DAG");
     q.complete_node(restart, second.node_id, Ok(()));
-    // Restart terminal → lease released → stop's Reconcile runs.
     let third = claim_one(&q);
-    assert_eq!(third.dag_id, stop);
-    q.complete_node(stop, third.node_id, Ok(()));
+    assert_eq!(third.dag_id, restart);
+    assert_eq!(third.kind.as_str(), "reconcile");
+    q.complete_node(restart, third.node_id, Ok(()));
+    // Restart terminal → lease released → stop's Reconcile runs.
+    let fourth = claim_one(&q);
+    assert_eq!(fourth.dag_id, stop);
+    q.complete_node(stop, fourth.node_id, Ok(()));
     assert_eq!(state_of(&q, restart), State::Done);
     assert_eq!(state_of(&q, stop), State::Done);
 }
@@ -510,6 +516,11 @@ fn terminal_dag_reported_exactly_once_and_lease_released() {
         &q,
         templates::restart("agent-a", Source::Manual, "r".to_owned()),
     );
+    // restart = SetWanted → StopForUpdate → Reconcile; not terminal until
+    // the last node completes.
+    let set_wanted = claim_one(&q);
+    q.complete_node(id, set_wanted.node_id, Ok(()));
+    assert!(q.drain_terminal().is_empty(), "dag not terminal yet");
     let stop = claim_one(&q);
     q.complete_node(id, stop.node_id, Ok(()));
     assert!(q.drain_terminal().is_empty(), "dag not terminal yet");
@@ -727,7 +738,7 @@ fn graceful_stop_shape_signal_drain_reconcile() {
         &q,
         templates::graceful_stop("agent-a", Source::Manual, "graceful".to_owned()),
     );
-    for expected in ["signal", "drain", "reconcile"] {
+    for expected in ["set_wanted", "signal", "drain", "reconcile"] {
         let c = claim_one(&q);
         assert_eq!(c.kind.as_str(), expected);
         q.complete_node(id, c.node_id, Ok(()));
@@ -753,8 +764,9 @@ fn graceful_signal_and_drain_hold_no_build_slot() {
     let kinds: Vec<&str> = claims.iter().map(|c| c.kind.as_str()).collect();
     assert_eq!(
         kinds,
-        vec!["prebuild", "signal", "signal"],
-        "both agents' signals fire while the slot is held"
+        vec!["prebuild", "set_wanted", "set_wanted"],
+        "both agents' graceful-stop heads (SetWanted, build-slot-exempt) run \
+         while the slot is held; their signals follow"
     );
 }