name the mint, not the publisher, as the writer of the client secrets
Finishes the sweep of prose that said the publisher unit writes or carries the OIDC client secrets: rust docs, nix comments and option descriptions, test names and docs.
This commit is contained in:
parent
05665c05f3
commit
2fc63d844b
1 changed files with 52 additions and 52 deletions
|
|
@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ let
|
|||
# Same 403-not-a-miss reason as grafana's arm above: the reader's grant
|
||||
# covers the `services` prefix, so a path outside it is refused rather
|
||||
# than empty, however correct it reads.
|
||||
name = "the collector's OIDC secret is read from the prefix the publisher writes";
|
||||
name = "the collector's OIDC secret is read from the prefix the mint writes";
|
||||
ok =
|
||||
let
|
||||
s = otelBaoRemoteAuthelia.systemd.services.swarm-bao-otel-oidc.script;
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue