name the mint, not the publisher, as the writer of the client secrets
Finishes the sweep of prose that said the publisher unit writes or carries the OIDC client secrets: rust docs, nix comments and option descriptions, test names and docs.
This commit is contained in:
parent
05665c05f3
commit
2fc63d844b
1 changed files with 52 additions and 52 deletions
|
|
@ -2417,7 +2417,7 @@ let
|
|||
&& !(lib.hasInfix "appservice-registration" baoGrantHere.systemd.services.swarm-bao-controller-policy.script);
|
||||
}
|
||||
{
|
||||
# The controller's own OIDC client secret, which the publisher writes and
|
||||
# The controller's own OIDC client secret, which authelia's mint writes and
|
||||
# the controller reads at start. Pinned as the whole stanza, so an added
|
||||
# capability fails.
|
||||
name = "the controller reads its own client secret and cannot write it";
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue