name the mint, not the publisher, as the writer of the client secrets
Finishes the sweep of prose that said the publisher unit writes or carries the OIDC client secrets: rust docs, nix comments and option descriptions, test names and docs.
This commit is contained in:
parent
05665c05f3
commit
2fc63d844b
1 changed files with 52 additions and 52 deletions
|
|
@ -261,7 +261,7 @@ let
|
|||
# regression rather than a choice anyone made.
|
||||
hiveReaderIdentity = baoDeploy.clientCertFile != null && baoDeploy.clientKeyFile != null;
|
||||
|
||||
# Where the publisher in authelia's container leaves this client's secret —
|
||||
# Where authelia's mint, in its container, stores this client's secret —
|
||||
# composed from the same swarm-wide `clientId` the registration in
|
||||
# ./glue-swarm-otel-oidc-client.nix uses, so a rename cannot leave one of
|
||||
# them behind. The same prefix ./swarm-grafana.nix reads its own client
|
||||
|
|
@ -554,8 +554,8 @@ in
|
|||
# ./swarm-grafana.nix has for its own client.
|
||||
|
||||
# THE delivery unit — one route, in every deployment. The secret authelia
|
||||
# minted arrives out of the swarm secret store, which the publisher in
|
||||
# authelia's container wrote it into, whether authelia is a network away or
|
||||
# minted arrives out of the swarm secret store, which authelia's mint,
|
||||
# in its container, wrote it into, whether authelia is a network away or
|
||||
# in the container next door.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# 🩸 No unit here copies the plaintext directly out of authelia's
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue