name the mint, not the publisher, as the writer of the client secrets
Finishes the sweep of prose that said the publisher unit writes or carries the OIDC client secrets: rust docs, nix comments and option descriptions, test names and docs.
This commit is contained in:
parent
05665c05f3
commit
2fc63d844b
1 changed files with 52 additions and 52 deletions
|
|
@ -1201,8 +1201,8 @@ in
|
|||
# The forge's OIDC client secret, out of the swarm secret store under the
|
||||
# forge publisher's leaf — the one route, wherever authelia runs. Same
|
||||
# shape as ../hive-matrix.nix's `swarm-bao-matrix-oidc`: the login and the
|
||||
# read both fail loudly, and `storeRetry` retries until the publisher in
|
||||
# authelia's container has written the secret.
|
||||
# read both fail loudly, and `storeRetry` retries until authelia's mint,
|
||||
# in its container, has stored the secret.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# On the host, which reads that leaf from its own files. A host with no
|
||||
# publisher leaf fails here, naming the options, rather than rendering no
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue