feat(#2772): branch on outcome in the graph, not inside the node
Splits what was one `Cancelled` outcome into two, because they were two
different facts wearing one name:
- `Skipped` — the node's own edges ruled it out. Expected; the failure
branch of a run that succeeded is `Skipped`. A parent's roll-up
**ignores** it.
- `Cancelled` — the work was dropped before it could start. Still
not-success for the roll-up, as before.
Without that split, branching on outcome defeats itself: exactly one
branch is always ruled out, `any_child_failed` counted it, and every DAG
containing a branch would have rolled up failed no matter how the run
went. Caught in review before it was written, not after.
`AFTER_ANY` becomes `{Done, Failed, Skipped}` — "anything except the work
being dropped". That is what it always meant; it only swept in
cancellation because cancellation wasn't distinguishable from
elimination. Audited every user rather than assuming, which is how the
one regression in my own proposal surfaced: `{Done, Failed}` would have
refused to run rebuild's recovery `Reconcile` after a failed `MetaSync`
(that eliminates `Prebuild`, so the tail's dep is `Skipped`, not
`Failed`) and left the container down.
With that, the templates stop computing outcomes and let the graph pick:
- `ResolveApproval { approval_id, outcome }` — one tail per outcome, each
edged to accept only its own, so exactly one is ever runnable.
- `EmitRebuilt { agent, ok }` — a pair. `ok` is not derived, it is which
of the two the graph let run.
Edges are conjunctive, so "any of these roots failed" is not directly
sayable. The composition: the success branch is `AFTER_OK` on every root
(so it is itself eliminated the moment one doesn't succeed), and the
failure branch keys off *that* elimination. The failure branch also
waits on every root — without it, a failed `Prebuild` eliminates the
success branch immediately and the failure would be announced while the
recovery `Reconcile` was still running. The tests caught that one.
Deletes, all of them #2770's host-side debt:
- `Claim.deps`, `DepOutcome`, `Claim::deps_state`, `Claim::deps_error`
and the dep-snapshotting loop in `claim_ready`. Executors read their
own variant now; nothing inspects anything.
- `NodeKind::is_tail()` and the `cancel` exemption built on it. Sparing
is derived from the edges: `cancel` keeps a node iff one of its edges
accepts `Cancelled`. An approval tail names it and survives to resolve
the row; `Reconcile` doesn't and is cancelled with the rest. My earlier
claim that this couldn't dissolve was only true while `AFTER_ANY`
accepted cancellation.
`resolve_approval_dag` / `deploy_terminal_tag` now take `TerminalState`
rather than the wire `State`, so both matches are exhaustive instead of
ending in a catch-all.
Skipped nodes are filtered off the wire alongside `Done` ones. That costs
some dashboard detail on a failed rebuild — which steps were skipped —
and the tests say so with a pointer to the follow-up. Surfacing them as
`Cancelled` instead would be worse: the client roll-up ranks `Cancelled`
above `Running`, so a successful DAG with a not-taken branch would read
as cancelled.
This commit is contained in:
parent
affedecaa5
commit
07078b76ef
8 changed files with 365 additions and 385 deletions
|
|
@ -507,20 +507,18 @@ async fn run_approval_schedule_prompt(
|
|||
/// so the work's terminal state is the authoritative outcome and there's no
|
||||
/// in-node resolution to skip around.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// `state` / `error` come from the tail node's own dependency roll-up
|
||||
/// ([`Claim::deps_state`] / [`Claim::deps_error`]), so this runs on the success,
|
||||
/// failure **and cancel** paths alike.
|
||||
/// `outcome` is the one the calling node was built to report — a template emits
|
||||
/// one tail per outcome, so success, failure and cancel each arrive here from
|
||||
/// their own node rather than from one node branching.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// [`NodeKind::ResolveApproval`]: crate::job_queue::NodeKind::ResolveApproval
|
||||
/// [`Claim::deps_state`]: crate::job_queue::Claim::deps_state
|
||||
/// [`Claim::deps_error`]: crate::job_queue::Claim::deps_error
|
||||
pub(crate) async fn resolve_approval_dag(
|
||||
coord: &Arc<Coordinator>,
|
||||
approval_id: i64,
|
||||
state: crate::job_queue::State,
|
||||
outcome: crate::job_queue::TerminalState,
|
||||
error: Option<&str>,
|
||||
) {
|
||||
use crate::job_queue::State;
|
||||
use crate::job_queue::TerminalState;
|
||||
let approval = match coord.approvals.get(approval_id) {
|
||||
Ok(Some(a)) => a,
|
||||
Ok(None) => {
|
||||
|
|
@ -532,10 +530,14 @@ pub(crate) async fn resolve_approval_dag(
|
|||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
let result: Result<()> = match state {
|
||||
State::Done => Ok(()),
|
||||
State::Cancelled => Err(anyhow::anyhow!("cancelled before completion")),
|
||||
_ => Err(anyhow::anyhow!("{}", error.unwrap_or("job dag failed"))),
|
||||
let result: Result<()> = match outcome {
|
||||
TerminalState::Done => Ok(()),
|
||||
// `Skipped` never reaches here — no template emits a tail for it — but it
|
||||
// reads the same to an operator either way: the work did not happen.
|
||||
TerminalState::Cancelled | TerminalState::Skipped => {
|
||||
Err(anyhow::anyhow!("cancelled before completion"))
|
||||
}
|
||||
TerminalState::Failed => Err(anyhow::anyhow!("{}", error.unwrap_or("job dag failed"))),
|
||||
};
|
||||
let mut terminal_tag = None;
|
||||
match approval.kind {
|
||||
|
|
@ -551,7 +553,7 @@ pub(crate) async fn resolve_approval_dag(
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
ApprovalKind::MergeConfigPr => {
|
||||
terminal_tag = deploy_terminal_tag(approval.agent.as_str(), approval_id, state).await;
|
||||
terminal_tag = deploy_terminal_tag(approval.agent.as_str(), approval_id, outcome).await;
|
||||
// On a failed deploy, surface the failing build log back onto the
|
||||
// PR so the manager sees why it was rejected without leaving the
|
||||
// forge. Posted here rather than inside a node because this is the
|
||||
|
|
@ -577,13 +579,14 @@ pub(crate) async fn resolve_approval_dag(
|
|||
async fn deploy_terminal_tag(
|
||||
agent: &str,
|
||||
approval_id: i64,
|
||||
state: crate::job_queue::State,
|
||||
outcome: crate::job_queue::TerminalState,
|
||||
) -> Option<String> {
|
||||
use crate::job_queue::State;
|
||||
let candidate = match state {
|
||||
State::Done => format!("deployed/{approval_id}"),
|
||||
State::Cancelled => return None,
|
||||
_ => format!("failed/{approval_id}"),
|
||||
use crate::job_queue::TerminalState;
|
||||
let candidate = match outcome {
|
||||
TerminalState::Done => format!("deployed/{approval_id}"),
|
||||
// Nothing ran, so nothing was planted.
|
||||
TerminalState::Cancelled | TerminalState::Skipped => return None,
|
||||
TerminalState::Failed => format!("failed/{approval_id}"),
|
||||
};
|
||||
lifecycle::git_rev_parse(&crate::paths::applied_dir(agent), &candidate)
|
||||
.await
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ use std::sync::Arc;
|
|||
use anyhow::{Context as _, Result};
|
||||
|
||||
use super::Claim;
|
||||
use super::model::{NodeKind, NodeSpec, State};
|
||||
use super::model::{NodeKind, NodeSpec, TerminalState};
|
||||
use crate::coordinator::Coordinator;
|
||||
use crate::power::{ReconcileAction, reconcile_action};
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -95,10 +95,11 @@ pub(super) async fn run_node(coord: &Arc<Coordinator>, claim: &Claim) -> Result<
|
|||
NodeKind::DeployApply { .. } => run_deploy_apply(coord, claim).await,
|
||||
NodeKind::FinalizeDeploy { .. } => run_finalize_deploy(coord, claim).await,
|
||||
NodeKind::DeployTail { .. } => run_deploy_tail(coord, claim).await,
|
||||
NodeKind::ResolveApproval { approval_id, .. } => {
|
||||
run_resolve_approval(coord, claim, *approval_id).await
|
||||
}
|
||||
NodeKind::EmitRebuilt { .. } => Ok(run_emit_rebuilt(coord, claim)),
|
||||
NodeKind::ResolveApproval {
|
||||
approval_id,
|
||||
outcome,
|
||||
} => run_resolve_approval(coord, claim, *approval_id, *outcome).await,
|
||||
NodeKind::EmitRebuilt { ok, .. } => Ok(run_emit_rebuilt(coord, claim, *ok)),
|
||||
NodeKind::SetWanted { up, .. } => run_set_wanted(coord, claim, *up),
|
||||
// Pure grouping container — no work; completing it lets it reach
|
||||
// `Finishing` so its child work nodes start. The DAG's terminal side
|
||||
|
|
@ -107,58 +108,39 @@ pub(super) async fn run_node(coord: &Arc<Coordinator>, claim: &Claim) -> Result<
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Resolve the DAG's approval row from how the work it follows ended. The
|
||||
/// outcome comes off this node's own dependency roll-up, not from re-reading
|
||||
/// the world. Best-effort: a resolution failure is logged inside
|
||||
/// [`crate::actions::resolve_approval_dag`], never surfaced as a node failure —
|
||||
/// the work already happened, and failing the tail would only misreport it.
|
||||
/// Resolve the DAG's approval row the way this node's own `outcome` says.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Nothing is inspected: a template emits one of these per outcome, each edged to
|
||||
/// accept only that one, so *which* node the scheduler let run already is the
|
||||
/// answer. Best-effort — a resolution failure is logged inside
|
||||
/// [`crate::actions::resolve_approval_dag`], never surfaced as a node failure,
|
||||
/// since the work already happened and failing the tail would only misreport it.
|
||||
async fn run_resolve_approval(
|
||||
coord: &Arc<Coordinator>,
|
||||
claim: &Claim,
|
||||
approval_id: i64,
|
||||
outcome: TerminalState,
|
||||
) -> Result<NodeOutput> {
|
||||
let reason = failure_reason(coord, claim);
|
||||
crate::actions::resolve_approval_dag(coord, approval_id, claim.deps_state(), reason.as_deref())
|
||||
.await;
|
||||
let reason = (outcome == TerminalState::Failed)
|
||||
.then(|| coord.job_queue.first_error(claim.dag_id))
|
||||
.flatten();
|
||||
crate::actions::resolve_approval_dag(coord, approval_id, outcome, reason.as_deref()).await;
|
||||
Ok(NodeOutput::default())
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Why the work a tail node follows failed, as a human-readable string.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Prefers the tail's own dependency error, but a dep that is a **group root**
|
||||
/// rolled up `Failed` from a child carries no error of its own (the reason lives
|
||||
/// on the leaf that actually failed) — and a grafted subgraph's nodes can't be
|
||||
/// edged statically anyway. So fall back to the DAG's first failing node. Still
|
||||
/// the queue's own graph, not the outside world.
|
||||
fn failure_reason(coord: &Arc<Coordinator>, claim: &Claim) -> Option<String> {
|
||||
claim
|
||||
.deps_error()
|
||||
.map(str::to_owned)
|
||||
.or_else(|| coord.job_queue.first_error(claim.dag_id))
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Emit this agent's `Rebuilt` manager event — `ok` when the work it follows is
|
||||
/// `Done`, `!ok` with the failure note when it `Failed`, and nothing at all when
|
||||
/// it `Cancelled` (nothing ran, so there is no rebuild to report).
|
||||
fn run_emit_rebuilt(coord: &Arc<Coordinator>, claim: &Claim) -> NodeOutput {
|
||||
let agent = claim.agent.clone();
|
||||
match claim.deps_state() {
|
||||
State::Done => coord.notify_manager(&hive_sh4re::HelperEvent::Rebuilt {
|
||||
agent,
|
||||
ok: true,
|
||||
note: None,
|
||||
sha: None,
|
||||
tag: None,
|
||||
}),
|
||||
State::Failed => coord.notify_manager(&hive_sh4re::HelperEvent::Rebuilt {
|
||||
agent,
|
||||
ok: false,
|
||||
note: failure_reason(coord, claim),
|
||||
sha: None,
|
||||
tag: None,
|
||||
}),
|
||||
_ => {}
|
||||
}
|
||||
/// Emit this agent's `Rebuilt` manager event. `ok` is not computed — it is which
|
||||
/// of the tail pair the graph let run. The failure note comes from the DAG's
|
||||
/// first failing node, since the branch knows *that* it failed but not *why*.
|
||||
fn run_emit_rebuilt(coord: &Arc<Coordinator>, claim: &Claim, ok: bool) -> NodeOutput {
|
||||
coord.notify_manager(&hive_sh4re::HelperEvent::Rebuilt {
|
||||
agent: claim.agent.clone(),
|
||||
ok,
|
||||
note: (!ok)
|
||||
.then(|| coord.job_queue.first_error(claim.dag_id))
|
||||
.flatten(),
|
||||
sha: None,
|
||||
tag: None,
|
||||
});
|
||||
NodeOutput::default()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ use hive_sh4re::wire_time::now_unix;
|
|||
use tokio::sync::Notify;
|
||||
|
||||
use crate::coordinator::TransientKind;
|
||||
pub use model::{DagSpec, DagView, NodeKind, NodeSpec, PermPayload, Source, State};
|
||||
pub use model::{DagSpec, DagView, NodeKind, NodeSpec, PermPayload, Source, State, TerminalState};
|
||||
use resource::Resource;
|
||||
|
||||
/// How many terminal DAGs (`Done` / `Failed` / `Cancelled`) the snapshot
|
||||
|
|
@ -60,31 +60,6 @@ const MAX_HISTORY_DAGS: usize = 50;
|
|||
/// Cap on stored node error strings.
|
||||
const MAX_ERROR_LEN: usize = 2_000;
|
||||
|
||||
/// How one of a claimed node's dependencies finished, snapshotted at claim time.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// A node only starts once its edges are satisfied, so every dep named here is
|
||||
/// already terminal: an `AfterOk` edge means [`State::Done`], an `AfterAny` edge
|
||||
/// means any of `Done` / `Failed` / `Cancelled`.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// This is what lets a tail node be an ordinary node. A tail that must report
|
||||
/// how the work below it went — "emit `Rebuilt { ok }`", "resolve this approval
|
||||
/// with the failure note" — reads its deps' outcomes off its own claim, rather
|
||||
/// than re-deriving them from the world after the fact. The alternative in this
|
||||
/// codebase is `DeployTail`, which infers success by re-reading *git state*; that
|
||||
/// works only because a deploy happens to write its result somewhere durable, and
|
||||
/// it is not a pattern to copy.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Carries no node id: a tail acts on *how* its dependencies ended, never on
|
||||
/// which one it was, so an id here would be a field with no reader.
|
||||
#[derive(Debug, Clone)]
|
||||
pub struct DepOutcome {
|
||||
/// Its terminal state, in wire terms.
|
||||
pub state: State,
|
||||
/// Its failure reason, when it failed with one of its own. A node that
|
||||
/// rolled up `Failed` from a child, or was cancelled, carries no error.
|
||||
pub error: Option<String>,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// A node claimed for execution — everything the executor needs, snapshotted at
|
||||
/// claim time.
|
||||
#[derive(Debug, Clone)]
|
||||
|
|
@ -101,38 +76,6 @@ pub struct Claim {
|
|||
/// pill is currently shown is derived from live lease ownership
|
||||
/// ([`JobQueue::held_transients`]), not a per-claim edge.
|
||||
pub transient: Option<TransientKind>,
|
||||
/// How each node this one depends on finished. Empty for a head node.
|
||||
/// See [`DepOutcome`] — this is how a tail node learns the outcome of the
|
||||
/// work it follows without going back to the world to ask.
|
||||
pub deps: Vec<DepOutcome>,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl Claim {
|
||||
/// Roll this claim's dependencies up into one outcome — what a weak-edged
|
||||
/// tail node acts on. `Done` only when every dep succeeded; `Failed` when any
|
||||
/// failed; otherwise `Cancelled` (all terminal, none failed, so the work was
|
||||
/// dropped before it ran).
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// A head node has no deps and rolls up `Done` — vacuously true, and never
|
||||
/// reached in practice since only tail kinds consult this.
|
||||
pub fn deps_state(&self) -> State {
|
||||
if self.deps.iter().all(|d| d.state == State::Done) {
|
||||
State::Done
|
||||
} else if self.deps.iter().any(|d| d.state == State::Failed) {
|
||||
State::Failed
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
State::Cancelled
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// The first failed dependency's error, for reporting *why* the work ended
|
||||
/// badly. `None` when nothing failed.
|
||||
pub fn deps_error(&self) -> Option<&str> {
|
||||
self.deps
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.find(|d| d.state == State::Failed)
|
||||
.and_then(|d| d.error.as_deref())
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Per-node runtime metadata the crate graph doesn't carry. Lifecycle
|
||||
|
|
@ -192,13 +135,19 @@ impl Default for JobQueue {
|
|||
|
||||
/// Map a crate node state onto the wire state (`Pending` ↔ `Queued`;
|
||||
/// `Finishing` — own logic done, sub-nodes still running — reads as `Running`).
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// `Skipped` has no wire counterpart and folds into `Cancelled`: to a reader
|
||||
/// both mean "this never ran". The distinction is a *scheduling* one — it
|
||||
/// decides whether a parent's roll-up counts the node — and the wire carries no
|
||||
/// roll-up input, only display state. In practice a client never sees it either:
|
||||
/// `dag_view` drops skipped nodes from the snapshot along with `Done` ones.
|
||||
fn to_wire_state(state: JobState) -> State {
|
||||
match state {
|
||||
JobState::Pending => State::Queued,
|
||||
JobState::Running | JobState::Finishing => State::Running,
|
||||
JobState::Done => State::Done,
|
||||
JobState::Failed => State::Failed,
|
||||
JobState::Cancelled => State::Cancelled,
|
||||
JobState::Cancelled | JobState::Skipped => State::Cancelled,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -365,24 +314,6 @@ impl JobQueue {
|
|||
};
|
||||
let kind = node.payload.clone();
|
||||
let agent = node.payload.agent().to_owned();
|
||||
let dep_ids: Vec<NodeId> = node
|
||||
.deps
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.filter_map(|d| match d {
|
||||
Dep::Node { id, .. } => Some(*id),
|
||||
Dep::Resource { .. } => None,
|
||||
})
|
||||
.collect();
|
||||
let deps: Vec<DepOutcome> = dep_ids
|
||||
.into_iter()
|
||||
.filter_map(|dep| {
|
||||
let n = inner.sched.graph().node(dep)?;
|
||||
Some(DepOutcome {
|
||||
state: to_wire_state(n.state),
|
||||
error: n.error.clone(),
|
||||
})
|
||||
})
|
||||
.collect();
|
||||
let Some(container) = inner.dag_of(id) else {
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
|
@ -397,7 +328,6 @@ impl JobQueue {
|
|||
approval_id: meta.approval_id,
|
||||
inputs: meta.inputs,
|
||||
transient: meta.transient,
|
||||
deps,
|
||||
});
|
||||
// `started_at` is stamped on the graph `Node` by the scheduler's
|
||||
// transition to `Running` — no host-side copy needed.
|
||||
|
|
@ -430,17 +360,17 @@ impl JobQueue {
|
|||
/// so each is cancelled. `false` once any work node is running or terminal —
|
||||
/// an in-flight nix build isn't interruptible.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// **Tail nodes are spared** ([`NodeKind::is_tail`]). They are weak-edged
|
||||
/// (`AfterAny`), and a `Cancelled` dep satisfies a weak edge, so sparing one
|
||||
/// leaves it *ready* rather than stranded: the scheduler claims it on the next
|
||||
/// pass, its [`Claim::deps_state`] reads `Cancelled`, and it resolves the
|
||||
/// approval as "cancelled before completion". That is what stops a queued
|
||||
/// approval DAG the operator cancelled from dangling its approval forever —
|
||||
/// the job the inline hook used to do from outside the graph.
|
||||
/// **Nodes that explicitly observe cancellation are spared** — a node whose
|
||||
/// edge names [`hive_jobq::TerminalState::Cancelled`] is asking to run when
|
||||
/// the work it follows was dropped, which is exactly what an approval tail
|
||||
/// needs: cancel the work, and the tail still fires to resolve the approval
|
||||
/// row rather than leaving it dangling forever.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Cancelling the tail too would be the bug: `cancel_node` only cascades along
|
||||
/// `AfterOk` edges and parent links, so nothing else would reach it, and the
|
||||
/// approval row would simply never be touched.
|
||||
/// Nothing is special-cased by node kind. `AFTER_ANY` deliberately does *not*
|
||||
/// accept `Cancelled`, so an ordinary weak-edged step (rebuild's `Reconcile`,
|
||||
/// say) is cancelled along with everything else — there is nothing to converge
|
||||
/// when no node ever ran. Only a node that named `Cancelled` survives, and it
|
||||
/// survives because it asked to.
|
||||
pub fn cancel(&self, dag_id: u64) -> bool {
|
||||
let mut inner = self.lock();
|
||||
let Some(container) = inner.container(dag_id) else {
|
||||
|
|
@ -458,12 +388,7 @@ impl JobQueue {
|
|||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
for id in work {
|
||||
if inner
|
||||
.sched
|
||||
.graph()
|
||||
.node(id)
|
||||
.is_some_and(|n| n.payload.is_tail())
|
||||
{
|
||||
if inner.observes_cancellation(id) {
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
inner.sched.cancel_node(id);
|
||||
|
|
@ -642,6 +567,18 @@ impl QueueInner {
|
|||
.is_some_and(|n| n.state.is_terminal())
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Whether `id` has an edge that accepts a **dropped** dependency — i.e. the
|
||||
/// node exists to report on work that may never run. Used by
|
||||
/// [`JobQueue::cancel`] to decide what to spare, so the decision comes from
|
||||
/// the node's own declared edges rather than a hardcoded list of kinds.
|
||||
fn observes_cancellation(&self, id: NodeId) -> bool {
|
||||
self.sched.graph().node(id).is_some_and(|n| {
|
||||
n.deps.iter().any(|d| {
|
||||
matches!(d, Dep::Node { when, .. } if when.accepts(hive_jobq::TerminalState::Cancelled))
|
||||
})
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// First failed work node's error (read off the graph `Node`), for the
|
||||
/// dashboard's DAG-level error line.
|
||||
fn dag_first_error(&self, container: NodeId) -> Option<String> {
|
||||
|
|
@ -682,7 +619,11 @@ impl QueueInner {
|
|||
if let Some(f) = node.finished_at {
|
||||
finished.push(f);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if node.state == JobState::Done {
|
||||
// `Done` nodes drop off the wire (a finished step isn't interesting),
|
||||
// and so do `Skipped` ones: a branch that was never taken is noise on
|
||||
// the dashboard, and surfacing it would also drag the client-side
|
||||
// roll-up toward `Cancelled` for a run that went fine.
|
||||
if matches!(node.state, JobState::Done | JobState::Skipped) {
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
let deps: Vec<u64> = node
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -20,8 +20,8 @@ use crate::coordinator::TransientKind;
|
|||
/// When a dependency edge is satisfied — re-exported from [`hive_jobq`] rather
|
||||
/// than mirrored here. It used to be a duplicate enum with a `to_crate_when`
|
||||
/// translation beside it; the copy bought nothing and had to be widened in
|
||||
/// lockstep every time the crate's edge model grew (#2772).
|
||||
pub use hive_jobq::DepWhen;
|
||||
/// lockstep every time the crate's edge model grew.
|
||||
pub use hive_jobq::{DepWhen, TerminalState};
|
||||
|
||||
/// A dependency edge (intra-DAG only — cross-DAG ordering comes from
|
||||
/// the per-agent lease + dedup, never from edges between DAGs).
|
||||
|
|
@ -233,9 +233,16 @@ pub enum NodeKind {
|
|||
/// carrying one here would be a second copy free to drift. Like
|
||||
/// [`NodeKind::MetaLock`] it reports `""` from [`NodeKind::agent`] and takes
|
||||
/// no lease — which is also what lets one close a multi-agent DAG.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// [`Claim::deps`]: super::Claim::deps
|
||||
ResolveApproval { approval_id: i64 },
|
||||
ResolveApproval {
|
||||
approval_id: i64,
|
||||
/// Which outcome this node reports. A template emits **one per outcome**,
|
||||
/// each edged to accept only that one, so exactly one is ever runnable
|
||||
/// and the executor has nothing to decide — it resolves the row the way
|
||||
/// its own variant says. The `Cancelled` one is also the node that
|
||||
/// [`super::JobQueue::cancel`] spares, since its edge is the only one
|
||||
/// that accepts a dropped dependency.
|
||||
outcome: TerminalState,
|
||||
},
|
||||
/// Tail node of a rebuild / perm-change: emit this agent's `Rebuilt` manager
|
||||
/// event — `ok` when its deps are `Done`, `!ok` carrying the failure note when
|
||||
/// they `Failed`, and **nothing at all** when they `Cancelled` (a cancelled DAG
|
||||
|
|
@ -243,8 +250,13 @@ pub enum NodeKind {
|
|||
///
|
||||
/// One node **per agent**, unlike the DAG-wide hook it replaces: a multi-agent
|
||||
/// DAG now reports each agent's own outcome instead of painting every agent with
|
||||
/// the whole DAG's roll-up.
|
||||
EmitRebuilt { agent: String },
|
||||
/// the whole DAG's roll-up. And one per *outcome* — `ok` isn't computed here,
|
||||
/// it's which of the pair the graph let run.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// There is deliberately no cancel variant: a DAG dropped before it started
|
||||
/// has no rebuild to report, and neither tail's edge accepts `Cancelled`, so
|
||||
/// both are cancelled with the rest and nothing is emitted.
|
||||
EmitRebuilt { agent: String, ok: bool },
|
||||
/// Write the agent's durable power intent (`wanted = Up` when `up`, else
|
||||
/// `Offline`) as a first-class DAG node, at the head of a power-op
|
||||
/// template so the downstream `Reconcile` reads it. Replaces the old
|
||||
|
|
@ -333,7 +345,7 @@ impl NodeKind {
|
|||
| NodeKind::DeployApply { agent }
|
||||
| NodeKind::FinalizeDeploy { agent }
|
||||
| NodeKind::DeployTail { agent }
|
||||
| NodeKind::EmitRebuilt { agent }
|
||||
| NodeKind::EmitRebuilt { agent, .. }
|
||||
| NodeKind::SetWanted { agent, .. } => agent,
|
||||
NodeKind::MetaLock { .. }
|
||||
| NodeKind::Reparent { .. }
|
||||
|
|
@ -342,20 +354,6 @@ impl NodeKind {
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Whether this is a DAG's **tail** — a node that reports how the rest of the
|
||||
/// DAG ended rather than doing work of its own.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// The one place this matters is [`super::JobQueue::cancel`], which spares
|
||||
/// tails so they still run (and report `Cancelled`) on a cancelled DAG. Note
|
||||
/// [`NodeKind::DeployTail`] is *not* one: despite the name it does real
|
||||
/// compensating work, and on a cancelled DAG there is nothing to compensate.
|
||||
pub fn is_tail(&self) -> bool {
|
||||
matches!(
|
||||
self,
|
||||
NodeKind::ResolveApproval { .. } | NodeKind::EmitRebuilt { .. }
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Nix-heavy kinds hold one of the `buildSlots` semaphore permits
|
||||
/// for the node's duration.
|
||||
pub fn needs_build_slot(&self) -> bool {
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
|
|||
|
||||
use anyhow::{Result, bail};
|
||||
|
||||
use super::model::{DagSpec, Dep, DepWhen, NodeKind, NodeSpec, PermPayload, Source};
|
||||
use super::model::{DagSpec, Dep, DepWhen, NodeKind, NodeSpec, PermPayload, Source, TerminalState};
|
||||
use crate::coordinator::TransientKind;
|
||||
|
||||
/// After-ok edge on the previous node — the common chain link. Shared with
|
||||
|
|
@ -43,14 +43,28 @@ pub(crate) fn after_ok(on: u64) -> Vec<Dep> {
|
|||
}]
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Weak edges onto every one of a DAG's other **group-roots** — how a tail node
|
||||
/// (`ResolveApproval` / `EmitRebuilt`) sees the whole DAG's outcome.
|
||||
/// `AfterOk` edges onto every one of a DAG's **group-roots** — the success
|
||||
/// branch of a per-outcome tail pair, and the aggregator the failure branch
|
||||
/// keys off.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Group-roots are the right granularity, not "every node": a root's state *is*
|
||||
/// its subtree's roll-up, so edging the roots covers every descendant while
|
||||
/// keeping the tail's dep list small and stable as subtrees grow. `AfterAny`
|
||||
/// throughout, so the tail runs on success, failure and cancel alike and decides
|
||||
/// from [`super::Claim::deps_state`].
|
||||
/// keeping the dep list small and stable as subtrees grow. Because every edge is
|
||||
/// `AFTER_OK`, this node runs only if *all* of them succeeded — and is ruled out
|
||||
/// ([`TerminalState::Skipped`]) the moment one doesn't, which is precisely the
|
||||
/// signal [`on_elimination_of`] waits for.
|
||||
pub(crate) fn after_ok_all(ons: &[u64]) -> Vec<Dep> {
|
||||
ons.iter()
|
||||
.map(|&on| Dep {
|
||||
on,
|
||||
when: DepWhen::AFTER_OK,
|
||||
})
|
||||
.collect()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// `AFTER_ANY` edges onto every group-root — "wait for all of these to finish,
|
||||
/// however they went". Ordering only; it accepts any outcome except the DAG
|
||||
/// being dropped.
|
||||
pub(crate) fn after_any_all(ons: &[u64]) -> Vec<Dep> {
|
||||
ons.iter()
|
||||
.map(|&on| Dep {
|
||||
|
|
@ -60,6 +74,89 @@ pub(crate) fn after_any_all(ons: &[u64]) -> Vec<Dep> {
|
|||
.collect()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// A single edge satisfied only when `on` was **ruled out** by its own edges.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Dependency edges are conjunctive, so "any one of these several nodes failed"
|
||||
/// cannot be written directly. This is the composition that expresses it: point
|
||||
/// the success branch at every root with [`after_ok_all`], then hang the failure
|
||||
/// branch off *that* node's elimination. Exactly one of the pair ever runs.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Note it accepts `Skipped` and **not** `Cancelled`: if the whole DAG was
|
||||
/// dropped before it started, the success branch is marked `Cancelled` directly
|
||||
/// and this branch is ruled out too — a job nobody ran reports nothing.
|
||||
pub(crate) fn on_elimination_of(on: u64) -> Vec<Dep> {
|
||||
vec![Dep {
|
||||
on,
|
||||
when: DepWhen::of(&[TerminalState::Skipped]),
|
||||
}]
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// A single edge satisfied only by the listed outcomes of `on` — for the
|
||||
/// one-tail-per-outcome shape an approval DAG uses.
|
||||
pub(crate) fn on_outcome(on: u64, outcomes: &[TerminalState]) -> Vec<Dep> {
|
||||
vec![Dep {
|
||||
on,
|
||||
when: DepWhen::of(outcomes),
|
||||
}]
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// The `Rebuilt`-reporting tail pair for a rebuild-shaped DAG: the success node
|
||||
/// gated on every group-root in `roots`, and the failure node gated on *its*
|
||||
/// elimination. `base` is the spec index the pair starts at.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Exactly one runs on a DAG that executed, and neither runs on one the operator
|
||||
/// dropped — see [`on_elimination_of`].
|
||||
fn emit_rebuilt_tails(agent: &str, roots: &[u64], base: u64) -> Vec<NodeSpec> {
|
||||
// The failure branch needs *both*: the ok branch being ruled out (that is the
|
||||
// "something went wrong" signal) **and** every root actually finished. The
|
||||
// second half is easy to forget and gets the ordering wrong without it — a
|
||||
// failed `Prebuild` eliminates the ok branch immediately, while the recovery
|
||||
// `Reconcile` is still bringing the container back up, so reporting straight
|
||||
// off the elimination would announce the failure mid-recovery.
|
||||
let mut on_fail = after_any_all(roots);
|
||||
on_fail.extend(on_elimination_of(base));
|
||||
vec![
|
||||
node(
|
||||
NodeKind::EmitRebuilt {
|
||||
agent: agent.to_owned(),
|
||||
ok: true,
|
||||
},
|
||||
after_ok_all(roots),
|
||||
),
|
||||
node(
|
||||
NodeKind::EmitRebuilt {
|
||||
agent: agent.to_owned(),
|
||||
ok: false,
|
||||
},
|
||||
on_fail,
|
||||
),
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// The approval-resolving tails for an approval-carrying DAG: one per outcome of
|
||||
/// the DAG's single group-root `root`, each accepting only its own.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// The `Cancelled` node is what keeps a dropped approval DAG from dangling its
|
||||
/// row forever — its edge is the only one [`super::JobQueue::cancel`] spares.
|
||||
fn resolve_approval_tails(approval_id: i64, root: u64) -> Vec<NodeSpec> {
|
||||
[
|
||||
TerminalState::Done,
|
||||
TerminalState::Failed,
|
||||
TerminalState::Cancelled,
|
||||
]
|
||||
.into_iter()
|
||||
.map(|outcome| {
|
||||
node(
|
||||
NodeKind::ResolveApproval {
|
||||
approval_id,
|
||||
outcome,
|
||||
},
|
||||
on_outcome(root, &[outcome]),
|
||||
)
|
||||
})
|
||||
.collect()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Build one **top-level (group-root)** node — `parent = None`. `kind` carries
|
||||
/// the agent it targets ([`NodeKind`] is the payload directly). Shared with
|
||||
/// `submit.rs`'s dynamic power-op builders. A root owns whatever resource it
|
||||
|
|
@ -198,12 +295,7 @@ pub(crate) fn deploy_rebuild_nodes(agent: &str) -> Vec<NodeSpec> {
|
|||
/// it reaches `Done` even after a failed swap and the tail would report success.
|
||||
pub fn rebuild(agent: &str, source: Source, reason: String, relock: bool) -> DagSpec {
|
||||
let mut nodes = rebuild_nodes(agent, relock, 0);
|
||||
nodes.push(node(
|
||||
NodeKind::EmitRebuilt {
|
||||
agent: agent.to_owned(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
after_any_all(&[0, 1, 5]),
|
||||
));
|
||||
nodes.extend(emit_rebuilt_tails(agent, &[0, 1, 5], 6));
|
||||
DagSpec {
|
||||
source,
|
||||
reason,
|
||||
|
|
@ -259,11 +351,10 @@ pub fn approval_deploy(agent: &str, approval_id: i64, reason: String) -> DagSpec
|
|||
when: DepWhen::AFTER_ANY,
|
||||
}],
|
||||
),
|
||||
node(
|
||||
NodeKind::ResolveApproval { approval_id },
|
||||
after_any_all(&[0]),
|
||||
),
|
||||
],
|
||||
]
|
||||
.into_iter()
|
||||
.chain(resolve_approval_tails(approval_id, 0))
|
||||
.collect(),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -319,11 +410,10 @@ pub fn spawn(agent: &str, approval_id: i64, reason: String) -> DagSpec {
|
|||
child(0, NodeKind::Create { agent: a() }, Vec::new()),
|
||||
child(1, NodeKind::WriteDropin { agent: a() }, Vec::new()),
|
||||
child(1, NodeKind::Reconcile { agent: a() }, after_ok(2)),
|
||||
node(
|
||||
NodeKind::ResolveApproval { approval_id },
|
||||
after_any_all(&[0]),
|
||||
),
|
||||
]
|
||||
.into_iter()
|
||||
.chain(resolve_approval_tails(approval_id, 0))
|
||||
.collect()
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -342,12 +432,7 @@ pub fn perm_change(agent: &str, source: Source, reason: String, payload: PermPay
|
|||
Vec::new(),
|
||||
)];
|
||||
nodes.extend(rebuild_nodes(agent, true, 1));
|
||||
nodes.push(node(
|
||||
NodeKind::EmitRebuilt {
|
||||
agent: agent.to_owned(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
after_any_all(&[0, 1, 2, 6]),
|
||||
));
|
||||
nodes.extend(emit_rebuilt_tails(agent, &[0, 1, 2, 6], 7));
|
||||
DagSpec {
|
||||
source,
|
||||
reason,
|
||||
|
|
@ -382,14 +467,11 @@ pub fn meta_update(
|
|||
Vec::new(),
|
||||
)];
|
||||
// The bump itself has no side effect, so an operator-driven one ends at the
|
||||
// `MetaLock`; an approval-driven one still has its row to resolve and gets a
|
||||
// tail edged onto that single group-root — whose roll-up covers the rebuild
|
||||
// subgraphs `MetaLock` grows into itself.
|
||||
// `MetaLock`; an approval-driven one still has its row to resolve and gets the
|
||||
// per-outcome tails edged onto that single group-root — whose roll-up covers
|
||||
// the rebuild subgraphs `MetaLock` grows into itself.
|
||||
if let Some(approval_id) = approval_id {
|
||||
nodes.push(node(
|
||||
NodeKind::ResolveApproval { approval_id },
|
||||
after_any_all(&[0]),
|
||||
));
|
||||
nodes.extend(resolve_approval_tails(approval_id, 0));
|
||||
}
|
||||
DagSpec {
|
||||
source,
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -48,35 +48,34 @@ fn claim_one(q: &JobQueue) -> Claim {
|
|||
claims.pop().expect("one claim")
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Claim an approval DAG's `ResolveApproval` tail, assert which approval it
|
||||
/// carries and what it will report to that row, then complete it. Replaces the
|
||||
/// old `terminal_summary()` assertions: the outcome is no longer a struct handed
|
||||
/// to a hook, it's what this node reads off its own deps.
|
||||
fn settle_approval_tail(q: &JobQueue, dag_id: u64, approval_id: i64, expect: State) {
|
||||
/// Claim an approval DAG's `ResolveApproval` tail and complete it, asserting it
|
||||
/// is the one built for `expect`.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// A template emits one tail per outcome and the graph runs exactly one, so the
|
||||
/// assertion is on *which node was claimed* — that alone says what the approval
|
||||
/// row is about to be resolved as. Nothing computes it.
|
||||
fn settle_approval_tail(q: &JobQueue, dag_id: u64, approval_id: i64, expect: TerminalState) {
|
||||
let tail = claim_one(q);
|
||||
assert!(
|
||||
matches!(tail.kind, NodeKind::ResolveApproval { approval_id: got } if got == approval_id),
|
||||
"expected the ResolveApproval tail for #{approval_id}, got {:?}",
|
||||
matches!(
|
||||
tail.kind,
|
||||
NodeKind::ResolveApproval { approval_id: got, outcome }
|
||||
if got == approval_id && outcome == expect
|
||||
),
|
||||
"expected the {expect:?} ResolveApproval tail for #{approval_id}, got {:?}",
|
||||
tail.kind
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
tail.deps_state(),
|
||||
expect,
|
||||
"outcome the tail reports to approval #{approval_id}"
|
||||
);
|
||||
q.complete_node(dag_id, tail.node_id, Ok(()));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// The `EmitRebuilt` counterpart of [`settle_approval_tail`] — claim a rebuild /
|
||||
/// perm-change DAG's tail, assert the `Rebuilt` event it will emit, complete it.
|
||||
fn settle_rebuild_tail(q: &JobQueue, dag_id: u64, agent: &str, expect: State) {
|
||||
/// The `EmitRebuilt` counterpart of [`settle_approval_tail`] — claim the tail the
|
||||
/// graph let run and assert it's the `ok` one expected.
|
||||
fn settle_rebuild_tail(q: &JobQueue, dag_id: u64, agent: &str, expect_ok: bool) {
|
||||
let tail = claim_one(q);
|
||||
assert_eq!(tail.kind.as_str(), "emit_rebuilt");
|
||||
assert_eq!(tail.agent, agent, "`Rebuilt` is emitted per agent");
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
tail.deps_state(),
|
||||
expect,
|
||||
"ok-ness of the emitted `Rebuilt`"
|
||||
assert!(
|
||||
matches!(&tail.kind, NodeKind::EmitRebuilt { agent: a, ok } if a == agent && *ok == expect_ok),
|
||||
"expected the ok={expect_ok} EmitRebuilt tail for {agent}, got {:?}",
|
||||
tail.kind
|
||||
);
|
||||
q.complete_node(dag_id, tail.node_id, Ok(()));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -229,7 +228,7 @@ fn rebuild_chain_claims_in_dep_order() {
|
|||
);
|
||||
q.complete_node(id, c.node_id, Ok(()));
|
||||
}
|
||||
settle_rebuild_tail(&q, id, "agent-a", State::Done);
|
||||
settle_rebuild_tail(&q, id, "agent-a", true);
|
||||
assert_eq!(state_of(&q, id), State::Done);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -736,73 +735,6 @@ fn meta_update_carries_rebuilding_transient_and_grows_cascade_in_dag() {
|
|||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// ---- dep outcomes on the claim ----
|
||||
|
||||
/// Every claimed node reports how each node it depends on finished, and those
|
||||
/// deps are always already terminal — that is what a node's edges being
|
||||
/// satisfied *means*. A tail node reads its `deps` instead of going back to the
|
||||
/// world to find out how the work below it went.
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn claim_carries_terminal_dep_outcomes() {
|
||||
let q = JobQueue::new(1);
|
||||
let id = submit(&q, rebuild("agent-a", "r"));
|
||||
let mut saw_a_dep = false;
|
||||
loop {
|
||||
let mut claims = q.claim_ready();
|
||||
let Some(claim) = claims.pop() else { break };
|
||||
assert!(claims.is_empty(), "one build slot ⇒ one claim at a time");
|
||||
for dep in &claim.deps {
|
||||
saw_a_dep = true;
|
||||
assert!(
|
||||
dep.state.is_terminal(),
|
||||
"{} was claimed with a non-terminal dep ({:?}) — a node's edges \
|
||||
being satisfied is exactly the claim that its deps have finished",
|
||||
claim.kind.as_str(),
|
||||
dep.state
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
dep.state,
|
||||
State::Done,
|
||||
"on the happy path every dep of {} finished Done",
|
||||
claim.kind.as_str()
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert_eq!(dep.error, None, "a Done dep carries no error");
|
||||
}
|
||||
q.complete_node(id, claim.node_id, Ok(()));
|
||||
}
|
||||
assert!(saw_a_dep, "the rebuild DAG has at least one dependent node");
|
||||
assert_eq!(state_of(&q, id), State::Done);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// The failure direction, which is the whole point of carrying outcomes at all:
|
||||
/// `Reconcile` hangs off `Prebuild` with `AfterAny`, so a failed prebuild
|
||||
/// cancel-cascades `StopForUpdate`/`Swap`/`PostSwap` and `Reconcile` still runs
|
||||
/// — and its claim hands it the failure, including the reason, rather than
|
||||
/// leaving the executor to go and re-derive it from the world.
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn claim_dep_outcome_reports_a_failed_dep_with_its_error() {
|
||||
let q = JobQueue::new(1);
|
||||
let id = submit(&q, rebuild("agent-a", "r"));
|
||||
let meta_sync = claim_one(&q);
|
||||
q.complete_node(id, meta_sync.node_id, Ok(()));
|
||||
let prebuild = claim_one(&q);
|
||||
assert_eq!(prebuild.kind.as_str(), "prebuild");
|
||||
q.complete_node(id, prebuild.node_id, Err("nix build exploded".to_owned()));
|
||||
let reconcile = claim_one(&q);
|
||||
assert_eq!(reconcile.kind.as_str(), "reconcile");
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
reconcile
|
||||
.deps
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.map(|d| (d.state, d.error.as_deref()))
|
||||
.collect::<Vec<_>>(),
|
||||
vec![(State::Failed, Some("nix build exploded"))],
|
||||
"reconcile's claim carries the failed prebuild and its reason"
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert_eq!(reconcile.deps_state(), State::Failed);
|
||||
assert_eq!(reconcile.deps_error(), Some("nix build exploded"));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// ---- failure: cancel-downstream + AfterAny ----
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
|
|
@ -831,9 +763,19 @@ fn failed_node_cancels_downstream_but_afterany_reconcile_runs() {
|
|||
.state
|
||||
};
|
||||
assert_eq!(by_kind("prebuild"), State::Failed);
|
||||
assert_eq!(by_kind("stop_for_update"), State::Cancelled);
|
||||
assert_eq!(by_kind("swap"), State::Cancelled);
|
||||
assert_eq!(by_kind("post_swap"), State::Cancelled);
|
||||
// `StopForUpdate` / `Swap` / `PostSwap` were *ruled out* by the failed
|
||||
// `Prebuild` — `Skipped`, and skipped nodes are filtered off the wire along
|
||||
// with `Done` ones. The failure itself is still visible (the `prebuild` row
|
||||
// above, and the roll-up), which is the part an operator acts on.
|
||||
// Restoring that detail wants a real `Skipped` wire state the client renders
|
||||
// as "not run" — surfacing them as `Cancelled` instead would make a
|
||||
// *successful* DAG with a not-taken branch read as cancelled.
|
||||
for ruled_out in ["stop_for_update", "swap", "post_swap"] {
|
||||
assert!(
|
||||
dag.nodes.iter().all(|n| n.kind != ruled_out),
|
||||
"{ruled_out} was ruled out, so it is off the wire"
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
// The AfterAny reconcile ran (claimed + completed Ok above) → it's `Done`,
|
||||
// and `Done` nodes are excluded from the wire, so it's absent here.
|
||||
assert!(
|
||||
|
|
@ -872,14 +814,18 @@ fn swap_failure_still_runs_reconcile() {
|
|||
q.complete_node(id, reconcile.node_id, Ok(()));
|
||||
let all_dags = q.snapshot();
|
||||
let dag = all_dags.iter().find(|d| d.id == id).expect("dag");
|
||||
assert!(
|
||||
dag.nodes.iter().all(|n| n.kind != "post_swap"),
|
||||
"PostSwap is ruled out by the failed Swap (`Skipped`, so off the wire)"
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
dag.nodes
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.find(|n| n.kind == "post_swap")
|
||||
.expect("post_swap node")
|
||||
.find(|n| n.kind == "swap")
|
||||
.expect("swap node")
|
||||
.state,
|
||||
State::Cancelled,
|
||||
"PostSwap must cancel-cascade when Swap fails"
|
||||
State::Failed,
|
||||
"and the failure that ruled it out is still on the wire"
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert_eq!(state_of(&q, id), State::Failed);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -911,7 +857,7 @@ fn swap_ok_runs_post_swap_before_reconcile() {
|
|||
let reconcile = claim_one(&q);
|
||||
assert_eq!(reconcile.kind.as_str(), "reconcile");
|
||||
q.complete_node(id, reconcile.node_id, Ok(()));
|
||||
settle_rebuild_tail(&q, id, "agent-a", State::Done);
|
||||
settle_rebuild_tail(&q, id, "agent-a", true);
|
||||
assert_eq!(state_of(&q, id), State::Done);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -939,18 +885,14 @@ fn cancel_clears_queued_dag() {
|
|||
// operator who just cancelled it (the dashboard renders this roll-up from
|
||||
// the snapshot `post_rebuild_queue_cancel` emits synchronously).
|
||||
assert_eq!(state_of(&q, id), State::Cancelled, "no stale Queued gap");
|
||||
// Every work node is `Cancelled`, but the tail is spared so it can still
|
||||
// report the cancellation — so it is the one thing left to claim.
|
||||
let tail = claim_one(&q);
|
||||
assert_eq!(tail.kind.as_str(), "emit_rebuilt");
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
tail.deps_state(),
|
||||
State::Cancelled,
|
||||
"the spared tail sees its deps cancelled, so it emits no `Rebuilt`"
|
||||
// Neither `EmitRebuilt` tail accepts a *dropped* dependency — the ok one is
|
||||
// `AFTER_OK`, the failure one keys on elimination — so both are cancelled
|
||||
// with the work and **nothing is emitted** for a rebuild that never ran.
|
||||
assert!(
|
||||
q.claim_ready().is_empty(),
|
||||
"a dropped rebuild reports nothing"
|
||||
);
|
||||
q.complete_node(id, tail.node_id, Ok(()));
|
||||
assert_eq!(state_of(&q, id), State::Cancelled);
|
||||
assert!(q.claim_ready().is_empty());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
|
|
@ -1065,21 +1007,10 @@ fn cancelled_dag_still_runs_its_approval_tail() {
|
|||
templates::approval_deploy("agent-a", 7, "approval #7".to_owned()),
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert!(q.cancel(id), "fully-queued dag cancels");
|
||||
let tail = claim_one(&q);
|
||||
assert_eq!(tail.dag_id, id);
|
||||
assert_eq!(tail.kind.as_str(), "resolve_approval");
|
||||
assert!(
|
||||
matches!(tail.kind, NodeKind::ResolveApproval { approval_id: 7 }),
|
||||
"the tail carries the approval to resolve, got {:?}",
|
||||
tail.kind
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
tail.deps_state(),
|
||||
State::Cancelled,
|
||||
"so the executor resolves the approval as cancelled, not as a failure"
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert_eq!(tail.deps_error(), None, "a cancelled dep carries no error");
|
||||
q.complete_node(id, tail.node_id, Ok(()));
|
||||
// The `Cancelled` tail is the only node whose edge accepts a dropped
|
||||
// dependency, so it is the only one `cancel` spares — and claiming it *is*
|
||||
// the assertion that the approval gets resolved as cancelled.
|
||||
settle_approval_tail(&q, id, 7, TerminalState::Cancelled);
|
||||
assert_eq!(state_of(&q, id), State::Cancelled);
|
||||
// Unrelated later activity doesn't disturb the settled DAG.
|
||||
let other = submit(&q, rebuild("agent-b", "r"));
|
||||
|
|
@ -1130,7 +1061,7 @@ fn deploy_dag_runs_phases_in_order_and_tails_a_failed_apply() {
|
|||
);
|
||||
q.complete_node(id, tail.node_id, Ok(()));
|
||||
|
||||
settle_approval_tail(&q, id, 7, State::Failed);
|
||||
settle_approval_tail(&q, id, 7, TerminalState::Failed);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
state_of(&q, id),
|
||||
State::Failed,
|
||||
|
|
@ -1203,7 +1134,7 @@ fn deploy_apply_grows_rebuild_subgraph_and_finalizes_after_it() {
|
|||
assert!(matches!(tail.kind, NodeKind::DeployTail { .. }));
|
||||
q.complete_node(id, tail.node_id, Ok(()));
|
||||
|
||||
settle_approval_tail(&q, id, 11, State::Done);
|
||||
settle_approval_tail(&q, id, 11, TerminalState::Done);
|
||||
assert_eq!(state_of(&q, id), State::Done);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -1254,7 +1185,7 @@ fn deploy_dag_skips_finalize_but_still_tails_a_failed_graft() {
|
|||
);
|
||||
q.complete_node(id, tail.node_id, Ok(()));
|
||||
|
||||
settle_approval_tail(&q, id, 13, State::Failed);
|
||||
settle_approval_tail(&q, id, 13, TerminalState::Failed);
|
||||
assert_eq!(state_of(&q, id), State::Failed);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
q.first_error(id).as_deref(),
|
||||
|
|
@ -1292,7 +1223,7 @@ fn deploy_dag_skips_apply_but_still_runs_tail_when_verify_fails() {
|
|||
);
|
||||
q.complete_node(id, tail.node_id, Ok(()));
|
||||
|
||||
settle_approval_tail(&q, id, 9, State::Failed);
|
||||
settle_approval_tail(&q, id, 9, TerminalState::Failed);
|
||||
assert_eq!(state_of(&q, id), State::Failed);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -1432,7 +1363,7 @@ fn spawn_shape_provision_create_dropin_reconcile() {
|
|||
assert_eq!(c.approval_id, Some(7));
|
||||
q.complete_node(id, c.node_id, Ok(()));
|
||||
}
|
||||
settle_approval_tail(&q, id, 7, State::Done);
|
||||
settle_approval_tail(&q, id, 7, TerminalState::Done);
|
||||
assert_eq!(state_of(&q, id), State::Done);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -1464,7 +1395,7 @@ fn perm_change_shape_prefixes_rebuild_chain() {
|
|||
assert_eq!(c.kind.as_str(), expected);
|
||||
q.complete_node(id, c.node_id, Ok(()));
|
||||
}
|
||||
settle_rebuild_tail(&q, id, "agent-a", State::Done);
|
||||
settle_rebuild_tail(&q, id, "agent-a", true);
|
||||
assert_eq!(state_of(&q, id), State::Done);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -66,8 +66,18 @@ pub enum TerminalState {
|
|||
Done,
|
||||
/// Own logic failed, or a sub-node did.
|
||||
Failed,
|
||||
/// Never ran — an edge it depended on became unsatisfiable.
|
||||
/// Never ran because the work was **dropped** before it could start — the
|
||||
/// caller cancelled the whole group while it was still queued. Counts as
|
||||
/// not-success when a parent rolls up.
|
||||
Cancelled,
|
||||
/// Never ran because its own **edges ruled it out**: a dependency settled on
|
||||
/// an outcome the edge doesn't accept. Expected, not a problem — the failure
|
||||
/// branch of a run that succeeded is `Skipped`.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// A parent's roll-up **ignores** `Skipped` children entirely. Without that,
|
||||
/// branching on outcome would be self-defeating: exactly one branch is always
|
||||
/// ruled out, so every group containing one would roll up failed.
|
||||
Skipped,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl TerminalState {
|
||||
|
|
@ -77,6 +87,7 @@ impl TerminalState {
|
|||
TerminalState::Done => 1,
|
||||
TerminalState::Failed => 1 << 1,
|
||||
TerminalState::Cancelled => 1 << 2,
|
||||
TerminalState::Skipped => 1 << 3,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -90,6 +101,7 @@ impl State {
|
|||
State::Done => Some(TerminalState::Done),
|
||||
State::Failed => Some(TerminalState::Failed),
|
||||
State::Cancelled => Some(TerminalState::Cancelled),
|
||||
State::Skipped => Some(TerminalState::Skipped),
|
||||
State::Pending | State::Running | State::Finishing => None,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -119,11 +131,17 @@ impl DepWhen {
|
|||
/// cancelled down the chain — e.g. a failed `Prebuild` must not let
|
||||
/// `StopForUpdate` stop a healthy container.
|
||||
pub const AFTER_OK: Self = Self(TerminalState::Done.bit());
|
||||
/// The dependency need only be terminal — any outcome satisfies. For steps
|
||||
/// that must converge regardless, e.g. `Reconcile` running even when the
|
||||
/// preceding `Swap` failed, or a tail node that reports how the work ended.
|
||||
/// Anything **except the work being dropped** — `Done`, `Failed` or
|
||||
/// `Skipped`. For steps that must converge regardless of how the run went,
|
||||
/// e.g. `Reconcile` bringing a container back up even when the preceding
|
||||
/// `Swap` failed *or* was itself ruled out by a failed `MetaSync`.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Deliberately excludes [`TerminalState::Cancelled`]: if the group never
|
||||
/// started at all there is nothing to converge, and running the recovery
|
||||
/// step anyway would act on work that provably never happened. A node that
|
||||
/// must report a cancellation names `Cancelled` explicitly.
|
||||
pub const AFTER_ANY: Self = Self(
|
||||
TerminalState::Done.bit() | TerminalState::Failed.bit() | TerminalState::Cancelled.bit(),
|
||||
TerminalState::Done.bit() | TerminalState::Failed.bit() | TerminalState::Skipped.bit(),
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
/// An edge satisfied by exactly the listed outcomes.
|
||||
|
|
@ -204,18 +222,24 @@ pub enum State {
|
|||
Done,
|
||||
/// Completed unsuccessfully — own logic failed, or a sub-node did.
|
||||
Failed,
|
||||
/// Never ran: an `AfterOk` dependency failed, so this node (and the rest of
|
||||
/// its strong-dependent chain) is cancelled rather than run.
|
||||
/// Never ran: the work was dropped while still queued. See
|
||||
/// [`TerminalState::Cancelled`].
|
||||
Cancelled,
|
||||
/// Never ran: its own edges ruled it out. See [`TerminalState::Skipped`] —
|
||||
/// notably, a parent's roll-up ignores these.
|
||||
Skipped,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl State {
|
||||
/// A node is *terminal* once it has finished — successfully, unsuccessfully,
|
||||
/// or cancelled — which is when its resources are released and dependents
|
||||
/// are re-evaluated.
|
||||
/// dropped, or ruled out — which is when its resources are released and
|
||||
/// dependents are re-evaluated.
|
||||
#[must_use]
|
||||
pub fn is_terminal(self) -> bool {
|
||||
matches!(self, State::Done | State::Failed | State::Cancelled)
|
||||
matches!(
|
||||
self,
|
||||
State::Done | State::Failed | State::Cancelled | State::Skipped
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -590,10 +614,16 @@ mod tests {
|
|||
assert!(!DepWhen::AFTER_OK.satisfied_by(State::Failed));
|
||||
assert!(!DepWhen::AFTER_OK.satisfied_by(State::Cancelled));
|
||||
assert!(!DepWhen::AFTER_OK.satisfied_by(State::Running));
|
||||
// AfterAny: any terminal state satisfies.
|
||||
assert!(!DepWhen::AFTER_OK.satisfied_by(State::Skipped));
|
||||
// AfterAny: the dep reached a terminal state *some other way than being
|
||||
// dropped* — success, failure, or ruled out by its own edges.
|
||||
assert!(DepWhen::AFTER_ANY.satisfied_by(State::Done));
|
||||
assert!(DepWhen::AFTER_ANY.satisfied_by(State::Failed));
|
||||
assert!(DepWhen::AFTER_ANY.satisfied_by(State::Cancelled));
|
||||
assert!(DepWhen::AFTER_ANY.satisfied_by(State::Skipped));
|
||||
assert!(
|
||||
!DepWhen::AFTER_ANY.satisfied_by(State::Cancelled),
|
||||
"a dropped dep does not converge a weak dependent — nothing ever ran"
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert!(!DepWhen::AFTER_ANY.satisfied_by(State::Pending));
|
||||
// Finishing satisfies neither — a dependent waits until the node rolls
|
||||
// up to a terminal state (all its sub-nodes done).
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -235,6 +235,9 @@ impl<N, R: Clone + Eq + Hash> Scheduler<N, R> {
|
|||
|
||||
/// Whether any direct child of `id` ended `Failed`/`Cancelled` — the roll-up
|
||||
/// failure condition for the parent.
|
||||
/// `Skipped` children are **not** counted: being ruled out by an edge is the
|
||||
/// expected fate of every branch not taken, so counting it would make any
|
||||
/// group that branches on outcome roll up failed no matter how the run went.
|
||||
fn any_child_failed(&self, id: NodeId) -> bool {
|
||||
self.graph
|
||||
.nodes()
|
||||
|
|
@ -321,9 +324,16 @@ impl<N, R: Clone + Eq + Hash> Scheduler<N, R> {
|
|||
.collect()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Propagate cancellation out from a just-terminal `origin`: every
|
||||
/// still-`Pending` node that can no longer run gets marked `Cancelled`,
|
||||
/// transitively. Cancelled nodes were `Pending`, so they hold no resources.
|
||||
/// Propagate elimination out from a just-terminal `origin`: every
|
||||
/// still-`Pending` node that can no longer run gets marked
|
||||
/// [`State::Skipped`], transitively. Skipped nodes were `Pending`, so they
|
||||
/// hold no resources.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// `Skipped`, not `Cancelled`: these nodes were *ruled out by their edges*,
|
||||
/// which is a normal outcome, not a dropped job. `Cancelled` is reserved for
|
||||
/// work the caller abandoned before it started ([`Scheduler::cancel_node`]),
|
||||
/// and the two are distinguished precisely so a parent's roll-up can ignore
|
||||
/// the former while still treating the latter as not-success.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// One rule decides it: **a node is doomed once any edge it names can never
|
||||
/// be satisfied** — the dep settled on an outcome that edge does not accept.
|
||||
|
|
@ -354,7 +364,7 @@ impl<N, R: Clone + Eq + Hash> Scheduler<N, R> {
|
|||
.map(|n| n.id)
|
||||
.collect();
|
||||
for d in doomed {
|
||||
self.graph.set_state(d, State::Cancelled);
|
||||
self.graph.set_state(d, State::Skipped);
|
||||
stack.push(d);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -505,10 +515,10 @@ mod tests {
|
|||
assert_eq!(n.error.as_deref(), Some("boom"));
|
||||
assert!(n.finished_at.is_some());
|
||||
|
||||
// The `AfterOk`-cancelled node: cascade-cancelled, so finished_at is set,
|
||||
// The `AFTER_OK` dependent: ruled out by its edge, so finished_at is set,
|
||||
// but it never ran (no started_at) and carries no error of its own.
|
||||
let n = s.graph().node(downstream).unwrap();
|
||||
assert_eq!(n.state, State::Cancelled);
|
||||
assert_eq!(n.state, State::Skipped);
|
||||
assert!(n.started_at.is_none());
|
||||
assert!(n.finished_at.is_some());
|
||||
assert_eq!(n.error, None);
|
||||
|
|
@ -750,8 +760,8 @@ mod tests {
|
|||
.expect("weak");
|
||||
assert_eq!(s.settle(), vec![root]);
|
||||
s.complete(root, Outcome::Failed(String::new()));
|
||||
assert_eq!(s.graph().node(strong1).unwrap().state, State::Cancelled);
|
||||
assert_eq!(s.graph().node(strong2).unwrap().state, State::Cancelled);
|
||||
assert_eq!(s.graph().node(strong1).unwrap().state, State::Skipped);
|
||||
assert_eq!(s.graph().node(strong2).unwrap().state, State::Skipped);
|
||||
assert_eq!(s.settle(), vec![weak]);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -776,8 +786,9 @@ mod tests {
|
|||
s.complete(root, Outcome::Done);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
s.graph().node(on_fail).unwrap().state,
|
||||
State::Cancelled,
|
||||
"a Failed-only branch is unsatisfiable once its dep succeeds"
|
||||
State::Skipped,
|
||||
"a Failed-only branch is unsatisfiable once its dep succeeds — and it is \
|
||||
`Skipped`, not `Cancelled`, so the parent roll-up ignores it"
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert!(s.settle().is_empty(), "and nothing is left runnable");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -803,15 +814,15 @@ mod tests {
|
|||
.expect("on_fail");
|
||||
assert_eq!(s.settle(), vec![root]);
|
||||
s.complete(root, Outcome::Failed("boom".to_owned()));
|
||||
assert_eq!(s.graph().node(on_ok).unwrap().state, State::Cancelled);
|
||||
assert_eq!(s.graph().node(on_ok).unwrap().state, State::Skipped);
|
||||
assert_eq!(s.settle(), vec![on_fail]);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// A weak edge accepts cancellation, so a tail survives the cancellation of
|
||||
/// the work it reports on — the property hive-c0re's approval tails rely on,
|
||||
/// held here by the edge itself rather than by any node-kind special case.
|
||||
/// A weak edge accepts a dependency that was *ruled out*, so a tail still
|
||||
/// runs when the work it reports on never happened — held by the edge itself
|
||||
/// rather than by any node-kind special case.
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn cancelled_dep_still_satisfies_a_weak_edge() {
|
||||
fn eliminated_dep_still_satisfies_a_weak_edge() {
|
||||
let mut s: Scheduler<&str, String> = Scheduler::new(Graph::new(), ResourceTable::new());
|
||||
let root = s.append("root", vec![], None).expect("root");
|
||||
let mid = s.append("mid", vec![after_ok(root)], None).expect("mid");
|
||||
|
|
@ -827,7 +838,7 @@ mod tests {
|
|||
.expect("tail");
|
||||
assert_eq!(s.settle(), vec![root]);
|
||||
s.complete(root, Outcome::Failed("boom".to_owned()));
|
||||
assert_eq!(s.graph().node(mid).unwrap().state, State::Cancelled);
|
||||
assert_eq!(s.graph().node(mid).unwrap().state, State::Skipped);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
s.settle(),
|
||||
vec![tail],
|
||||
|
|
@ -838,11 +849,12 @@ mod tests {
|
|||
/// Edges are **conjunctive**, so "any of these several nodes failed" is not
|
||||
/// directly expressible — a `{Failed}` edge on each would mean *all* failed.
|
||||
/// The composition that does work: the success branch depends `AFTER_OK` on
|
||||
/// every node (so it runs only if all succeeded, and is cancelled the moment
|
||||
/// one doesn't), and the failure branch hangs off *it* with `{Cancelled}`.
|
||||
/// The success branch becomes the aggregator, and exactly one of the two runs.
|
||||
/// every node (so it runs only if all succeeded, and is ruled out the moment
|
||||
/// one doesn't), and the failure branch hangs off *it* with `{Skipped}` —
|
||||
/// "run when the success branch was ruled out". The success branch is the
|
||||
/// aggregator, and exactly one of the two runs.
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn ok_branch_aggregates_and_failure_branch_hangs_off_its_cancellation() {
|
||||
fn ok_branch_aggregates_and_failure_branch_hangs_off_its_elimination() {
|
||||
let build = || {
|
||||
let mut s: Scheduler<&str, String> = Scheduler::new(Graph::new(), ResourceTable::new());
|
||||
let a = s.append("a", vec![], None).expect("a");
|
||||
|
|
@ -855,7 +867,7 @@ mod tests {
|
|||
"on_fail",
|
||||
vec![Dep::Node {
|
||||
id: on_ok,
|
||||
when: DepWhen::of(&[TerminalState::Cancelled]),
|
||||
when: DepWhen::of(&[TerminalState::Skipped]),
|
||||
}],
|
||||
None,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
|
@ -870,16 +882,16 @@ mod tests {
|
|||
s.complete(b, Outcome::Done);
|
||||
assert_eq!(s.settle(), vec![on_ok]);
|
||||
s.complete(on_ok, Outcome::Done);
|
||||
assert_eq!(s.graph().node(on_fail).unwrap().state, State::Cancelled);
|
||||
assert_eq!(s.graph().node(on_fail).unwrap().state, State::Skipped);
|
||||
assert!(s.settle().is_empty());
|
||||
|
||||
// One of them fails: the ok branch is cancelled, which is precisely the
|
||||
// One of them fails: the ok branch is ruled out, which is precisely the
|
||||
// signal the failure branch waits on.
|
||||
let (mut s, a, b, on_ok, on_fail) = build();
|
||||
assert_eq!(s.settle(), vec![a, b]);
|
||||
s.complete(a, Outcome::Failed("boom".to_owned()));
|
||||
s.complete(b, Outcome::Done);
|
||||
assert_eq!(s.graph().node(on_ok).unwrap().state, State::Cancelled);
|
||||
assert_eq!(s.graph().node(on_ok).unwrap().state, State::Skipped);
|
||||
assert_eq!(s.settle(), vec![on_fail]);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -893,8 +905,8 @@ mod tests {
|
|||
let grandchild = s.append("gc", vec![], Some(child)).expect("gc");
|
||||
assert_eq!(s.settle(), vec![root]);
|
||||
s.complete(root, Outcome::Failed(String::new()));
|
||||
assert_eq!(s.graph().node(child).unwrap().state, State::Cancelled);
|
||||
assert_eq!(s.graph().node(grandchild).unwrap().state, State::Cancelled);
|
||||
assert_eq!(s.graph().node(child).unwrap().state, State::Skipped);
|
||||
assert_eq!(s.graph().node(grandchild).unwrap().state, State::Skipped);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
|
|
@ -903,8 +915,9 @@ mod tests {
|
|||
let a = s.append("a", vec![], None).expect("a");
|
||||
let b = s.append("b", vec![after_ok(a)], None).expect("b");
|
||||
assert!(s.cancel_node(a));
|
||||
// `a` was dropped by the caller; `b` was merely ruled out by its edge.
|
||||
assert_eq!(s.graph().node(a).unwrap().state, State::Cancelled);
|
||||
assert_eq!(s.graph().node(b).unwrap().state, State::Cancelled);
|
||||
assert_eq!(s.graph().node(b).unwrap().state, State::Skipped);
|
||||
let c = s.append("c", vec![], None).expect("c");
|
||||
assert_eq!(s.settle(), vec![c]);
|
||||
assert!(!s.cancel_node(c));
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue