`docs/tools/scheduling.md` said three things about who may do what. Two
were wrong prose; the third was the code.
"All scheduling ops go through the operator approval queue" — one of the
five does. Cancel, edit, list and fire are `require_group("scheduling")`
and nothing else (socket_server/mod.rs:594-643), which is what the MCP
tool descriptions already tell an agent. The page pushed in the cautious
direction: someone watching a runaway recurring schedule would wait for
an operator rather than cancel it themselves.
The authorization sentence covered "read/cancel/edit". Cancel, edit and
fire really do check `cancel_authorized` (self, operator, or subtree) from
three call sites. `handle_list_schedules` takes no requester at all and
returns every row — now stated, along with the part that matters: the
snapshot includes other agents' schedule bodies.
`lines` was documented as "host-capped at 500" and the 500 was in the
agent's own MCP layer, not the host; `handle_get_logs` passed any u32
straight into JournalQuery. A limit in the caller is not a limit, so the
host clamps instead of the sentence changing. That also makes args.rs's
arg doc and the tool description agents read correct, untouched. The
sibling `get_host_journal` already clamps host-side at 100, which is both
the precedent and the control that the missing clamp here was real.
Closes#4230.
c28da210b4