Two review findings from the previous round, re-checked against the
actual tree rather than against my notes.
`Scheduler::complete` was still a public wrapper whose entire body was
`self.finish(id, outcome)`. Its docstring argued the split was not a
redirect because both completion forms shared `finish` -- but sharing a
private helper is not a reason for two public names. `finish`'s body now
lives in `complete`, and `complete_growing` calls it. Same sharing, one
name, no redirect.
Growth on a failed node is now dropped by `complete_growing` instead of
by the host loop. Failure cancel-cascades to every pending child of the
completing node, and grown work is inserted as its children, so anything
appended here is Skipped by the next statement -- the insert is not
wrong, it is provably pointless. That is a consequence of this crate's
cascade rule, so this crate should be the one enforcing it; a host that
has to remember it can forget it. Behaviour is unchanged: hive-c0re
already dropped growth before calling, and now no longer has to.
`Scheduler::new_job` is left alone but documented for what it is: the
hole in `JobBuilder::new`'s pub(crate) wall, with no non-test caller
since claim_next mints a builder per running node. Closing it is a venue
question rather than a rename, so it stays for now.
8459cc66bd