Watch
0
0
Fork
You've already forked hyperhive
0
Commit graph hyperhive/swarm-controller/src/forge/classifier_account.rs
Author SHA1 Message Date
atlas
2fc0166427 swarm-controller: record the review classifier's runs and list them
Every run is recorded when it ends: a try-out when its reply settles it,
a requested review once its review is posted or the post fails, and a
request turned away by a full queue once its comment is posted. A
duplicate request that starts nothing is not recorded. The newest 100
are one JSON array under `recent` in a new controller-owned KV bucket,
`review-classifier-runs`, written with compare-and-set as
`schedule-definitions` is (five attempts). A failed write is logged; the
review is already posted by then.

Each recorded run is also one info event, "review classifier run
finished", with the record's fields as tracing fields. The controller
logs natively to the journal, so they reach VictoriaLogs as F_<NAME>.

GET /api/review-classifier/runs returns the list, newest first, gated
by the gateway like the try-out GET. post_classifier_review now returns
the posted review's html_url, which the record keeps as review_url.

Closes #5153, part of #5096.
2026-10-12 21:48:51 +02:00
atlas
a669cd96b6 swarm-controller: post the review classifier's verdict on a review request
Requesting the forge account `review-classifier` as a reviewer now runs the
repo's rules against the PR and posts the result as that account's review,
on the head commit the run read. A push starts no run; only a fresh review
request does.

- An instance-wide `pull_request_review_request` system hook delivers to
  `/webhook/forge/review-request`. A request for any other reviewer, or a
  removed request, does nothing.
- The controller reads the PR, loads the rules with the same reader as
  `GET /api/review-classifier/rules`, sends one request on the try-out
  subject, and posts APPROVED or REQUEST_CHANGES with the table as the body.
- With no clean verdict (PR or rules don't load, the run fails, or any
  classification has no answer) it posts a COMMENT saying why, never an
  approval. The event is one function, `no_clean_verdict_event`.
- Table cells are flattened, markup-escaped, and every `@` gets a
  zero-width space, so a model's reason can't break the table or mention
  anyone.
- At most two requested reviews run at once; the rest wait in memory.
- The account is minted the way hive accounts are: a five-minute pass
  queues a `MintClassifierForgeToken` node when the token at
  `swarm/services/review-classifier/forge/token` is missing or stale. The
  token is `write:repository`. The controller's bao policy gains that leaf
  (create/read/update), pinned in module-eval bao-grants. The classifier
  never sees the token.

The account gets no repo access automatically; a repo admin adds it by
hand. A re-request retires the account's earlier review: Forgejo clears
`official` on a reviewer's earlier reviews when it is requested again
(models/issues/review.go AddReviewRequest, v16.0.5), and approvals and
rejection blocks count official reviews only.

Refs #5137
2026-10-12 16:11:50 +02:00