review classifier: a setting makes the PR review list only the failed rules
failures_only (off by default, also for a stored document without it) makes the review the classifier posts on a PR list just the rows that failed their rule, or say that no check failed on an approval. A review with no clean verdict and a try-out keep every row. The classifier settings form gets a checkbox for it.
This commit is contained in:
parent
818d41eef3
commit
cf5746188a
3 changed files with 138 additions and 9 deletions
|
|
@ -1053,6 +1053,7 @@ pub(crate) mod tests {
|
|||
effort: Some(Effort::High),
|
||||
max_concurrent_reviews: 2,
|
||||
max_classifications: 10,
|
||||
failures_only: false,
|
||||
runtime: settings::RuntimeKind::Acp,
|
||||
acp: Some(acp.clone()),
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -855,7 +855,12 @@ enum Outcome {
|
|||
/// Nothing reached the classifier, for this reason.
|
||||
NotRun(String),
|
||||
/// The classifier answered a run of `sent` classifications.
|
||||
Ran { sent: usize, reply: Reply },
|
||||
Ran {
|
||||
sent: usize,
|
||||
reply: Reply,
|
||||
/// Whether the review lists only the rules that failed.
|
||||
failures_only: bool,
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Read the rules, run them on `pull`, the PR as it was read, and post the
|
||||
|
|
@ -1106,6 +1111,7 @@ async fn classify(
|
|||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
let failures_only = settings.failures_only;
|
||||
let request = TryOut {
|
||||
operator: req.requester.clone(),
|
||||
repo,
|
||||
|
|
@ -1123,6 +1129,7 @@ async fn classify(
|
|||
Ok(payload) => Outcome::Ran {
|
||||
sent,
|
||||
reply: sink.run(payload, run_deadline(sent)).await,
|
||||
failures_only,
|
||||
},
|
||||
Err(e) => Outcome::NotRun(format!("encoding the run failed: {e}")),
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
|
@ -1170,6 +1177,7 @@ fn review_for(outcome: &Outcome) -> Ruling {
|
|||
Outcome::Ran {
|
||||
sent,
|
||||
reply: Reply::Done { rows, overall },
|
||||
failures_only,
|
||||
} => {
|
||||
let unanswered = rows.iter().filter(|r| r.error.is_some()).count();
|
||||
if rows.is_empty() || rows.len() != *sent {
|
||||
|
|
@ -1191,7 +1199,15 @@ fn review_for(outcome: &Outcome) -> Ruling {
|
|||
};
|
||||
Ruling {
|
||||
event,
|
||||
body: format!("{}\n{}", table(rows), overall_line(*overall)),
|
||||
body: format!(
|
||||
"{}\n{}",
|
||||
if *failures_only {
|
||||
failures(rows)
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
table(rows)
|
||||
},
|
||||
overall_line(*overall)
|
||||
),
|
||||
reason: None,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -1235,6 +1251,21 @@ fn table(rows: &[Row]) -> String {
|
|||
out
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// The result table of only the rows that failed their rule, the ones that
|
||||
/// make the review ask for changes, or a line saying none did.
|
||||
fn failures(rows: &[Row]) -> String {
|
||||
let failed: Vec<Row> = rows
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.filter(|r| r.counted && !r.passed)
|
||||
.cloned()
|
||||
.collect();
|
||||
if failed.is_empty() {
|
||||
"No check failed.\n".to_owned()
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
table(&failed)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// A row's result cell: the symbol for what the row did to the review, then
|
||||
/// the model's verdict. ✅ is a counted row that passed its polarity, ❌ a
|
||||
/// counted row that failed it, ❔ a row that doesn't count: below its
|
||||
|
|
@ -1456,6 +1487,54 @@ mod tests {
|
|||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn done(failures_only: bool, rows: Vec<Row>, overall: Overall) -> Ruling {
|
||||
review_for(&Outcome::Ran {
|
||||
sent: rows.len(),
|
||||
failures_only,
|
||||
reply: Reply::Done { rows, overall },
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn failures_only_lists_just_the_rows_that_failed() {
|
||||
let mut failed = row(None, true, false);
|
||||
failed.name = "no-secrets".to_owned();
|
||||
let rows = vec![row(None, true, true), failed, row(None, false, true)];
|
||||
|
||||
let all = done(false, rows.clone(), Overall::RequestChanges);
|
||||
assert!(all.body.contains("datetime"), "{}", all.body);
|
||||
assert!(all.body.contains("no-secrets"), "{}", all.body);
|
||||
|
||||
let only = done(true, rows, Overall::RequestChanges);
|
||||
assert_eq!(only.event, Event::RequestChanges);
|
||||
assert!(only.body.contains("no-secrets"), "{}", only.body);
|
||||
assert!(!only.body.contains("datetime"), "{}", only.body);
|
||||
assert!(only.body.ends_with("**Overall: ❌ request changes**\n"));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn failures_only_on_an_approval_says_no_check_failed() {
|
||||
let ruling = done(
|
||||
true,
|
||||
vec![row(None, true, true), row(None, false, true)],
|
||||
Overall::Approve,
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert_eq!(ruling.event, Event::Approve);
|
||||
assert_eq!(ruling.body, "No check failed.\n\n**Overall: ✅ approve**\n");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn failures_only_keeps_the_full_table_when_a_row_got_no_answer() {
|
||||
let ruling = done(
|
||||
true,
|
||||
vec![row(None, true, true), row(Some("timed out"), false, false)],
|
||||
Overall::Approve,
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert_eq!(ruling.event, Event::Comment);
|
||||
assert!(ruling.body.contains("datetime"), "{}", ruling.body);
|
||||
assert!(ruling.body.contains("timed out"), "{}", ruling.body);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn request(name: &str) -> Requested {
|
||||
Requested {
|
||||
owner: "o".to_owned(),
|
||||
|
|
@ -1568,6 +1647,7 @@ mod tests {
|
|||
// empty answer to one still has no verdict.
|
||||
let ruling = review_for(&Outcome::Ran {
|
||||
sent: 0,
|
||||
failures_only: false,
|
||||
reply: Reply::Done {
|
||||
rows: Vec::new(),
|
||||
overall: Overall::Approve,
|
||||
|
|
@ -2727,6 +2807,7 @@ mod tests {
|
|||
effort: Some(Effort::Medium),
|
||||
max_concurrent_reviews: 2,
|
||||
max_classifications: 10,
|
||||
failures_only: false,
|
||||
runtime: super::super::settings::RuntimeKind::Acp,
|
||||
acp: Some(acp.clone()),
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -64,6 +64,12 @@ pub(crate) struct Settings {
|
|||
/// minutes. A document stored before this field has the default.
|
||||
#[serde(default = "default_max_classifications")]
|
||||
pub(crate) max_classifications: usize,
|
||||
/// Whether a posted PR review lists only the rules that failed, rather than
|
||||
/// every rule with its result. A review with no failed rule says so in a
|
||||
/// line. A try-out shows every rule either way. A document stored before this
|
||||
/// field has `false`.
|
||||
#[serde(default)]
|
||||
pub(crate) failures_only: bool,
|
||||
/// What every classification runs on.
|
||||
#[serde(default)]
|
||||
pub(crate) runtime: RuntimeKind,
|
||||
|
|
@ -91,6 +97,7 @@ impl Default for Settings {
|
|||
effort: None,
|
||||
max_concurrent_reviews: 2,
|
||||
max_classifications: DEFAULT_MAX_CLASSIFICATIONS,
|
||||
failures_only: false,
|
||||
runtime: RuntimeKind::ApiKey,
|
||||
acp: None,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -191,6 +198,9 @@ pub(crate) struct SettingsUpdate {
|
|||
#[schema(value_type = Option<usize>)]
|
||||
max_classifications: Option<usize>,
|
||||
#[serde(default, deserialize_with = "present")]
|
||||
#[schema(value_type = Option<bool>)]
|
||||
failures_only: Option<bool>,
|
||||
#[serde(default, deserialize_with = "present")]
|
||||
#[schema(value_type = Option<RuntimeKind>)]
|
||||
runtime: Option<RuntimeKind>,
|
||||
#[serde(default)]
|
||||
|
|
@ -244,6 +254,7 @@ impl SettingsUpdate {
|
|||
max_classifications: self
|
||||
.max_classifications
|
||||
.unwrap_or(stored.max_classifications),
|
||||
failures_only: self.failures_only.unwrap_or(stored.failures_only),
|
||||
runtime: self.runtime.unwrap_or(stored.runtime),
|
||||
acp: self.acp.or(stored.acp),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -277,6 +288,7 @@ const FIELDS: &[&str] = &[
|
|||
"effort",
|
||||
"max_concurrent_reviews",
|
||||
"max_classifications",
|
||||
"failures_only",
|
||||
"runtime",
|
||||
"acp",
|
||||
];
|
||||
|
|
@ -329,7 +341,7 @@ fn queue_problem(e: &anyhow::Error) -> ProblemDetails {
|
|||
responses(
|
||||
(status = 200, description = "the settings in force; with none stored, \
|
||||
`{\"model\":\"haiku\",\"effort\":null,\"max_concurrent_reviews\":2,\
|
||||
\"max_classifications\":10,\"runtime\":\"api-key\",\"acp\":null}`",
|
||||
\"max_classifications\":10,\"failures_only\":false,\"runtime\":\"api-key\",\"acp\":null}`",
|
||||
body = Settings),
|
||||
(status = 503, description = "no swarm queue is configured on this host, or it is \
|
||||
not connected (problem+json)", body = String),
|
||||
|
|
@ -360,7 +372,7 @@ pub(crate) async fn get_settings(
|
|||
(status = 400, description = "not JSON or not this shape: an unknown field, a \
|
||||
`null` other than for `effort` or `acp`, an effort other than the five \
|
||||
levels, a negative or non-integer `max_concurrent_reviews` or \
|
||||
`max_classifications`, a runtime other \
|
||||
`max_classifications`, a `failures_only` that is not a boolean, a runtime other \
|
||||
than `api-key` or `acp`, an `acp` without `base_url`, `model` or `prices`; or, \
|
||||
once applied, a model that is empty, has whitespace or starts with `-`, \
|
||||
`max_concurrent_reviews` outside 1 to 8, `max_classifications` outside 1 to \
|
||||
|
|
@ -449,7 +461,7 @@ mod tests {
|
|||
serde_json::to_value(Settings::default()).unwrap(),
|
||||
serde_json::json!({
|
||||
"model": "haiku", "effort": null, "max_concurrent_reviews": 2,
|
||||
"max_classifications": 10, "runtime": "api-key", "acp": null,
|
||||
"max_classifications": 10, "failures_only": false, "runtime": "api-key", "acp": null,
|
||||
})
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert_eq!(Settings::default().runtime(), Ok(Runtime::ApiKey));
|
||||
|
|
@ -464,6 +476,7 @@ mod tests {
|
|||
effort: Some(Effort::High),
|
||||
max_concurrent_reviews: 5,
|
||||
max_classifications: 40,
|
||||
failures_only: true,
|
||||
runtime: RuntimeKind::Acp,
|
||||
acp: Some(provider()),
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
|
@ -637,6 +650,7 @@ mod tests {
|
|||
effort: Some(Effort::High),
|
||||
max_concurrent_reviews: 3,
|
||||
max_classifications: 25,
|
||||
failures_only: true,
|
||||
runtime: RuntimeKind::Acp,
|
||||
acp: Some(provider()),
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
|
@ -732,7 +746,7 @@ mod tests {
|
|||
read,
|
||||
serde_json::json!({
|
||||
"model": "sonnet", "effort": "high", "max_concurrent_reviews": 3,
|
||||
"max_classifications": 10, "runtime": "api-key", "acp": null,
|
||||
"max_classifications": 10, "failures_only": false, "runtime": "api-key", "acp": null,
|
||||
})
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -770,7 +784,7 @@ mod tests {
|
|||
|
||||
let wanted = serde_json::json!({
|
||||
"model": "sonnet", "effort": "high", "max_concurrent_reviews": 5,
|
||||
"max_classifications": 10, "runtime": "api-key", "acp": null,
|
||||
"max_classifications": 10, "failures_only": false, "runtime": "api-key", "acp": null,
|
||||
});
|
||||
let (status, stored, _) = send(&app, put(&wanted.to_string())).await;
|
||||
assert_eq!(status, StatusCode::OK, "{stored}");
|
||||
|
|
@ -811,7 +825,7 @@ mod tests {
|
|||
after,
|
||||
serde_json::json!({
|
||||
"model": "sonnet", "effort": null, "max_concurrent_reviews": 4,
|
||||
"max_classifications": 10, "runtime": "acp", "acp": acp,
|
||||
"max_classifications": 10, "failures_only": false, "runtime": "acp", "acp": acp,
|
||||
})
|
||||
);
|
||||
let read = nats.client().await.settings().await.expect("readable");
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue