docs: the handbook follows the three layers: swarm, hives, agents
The handbook's sections were agent-lifecycle, integrations, swarm, tools, trust-boundary and web-ui, which do not follow how the system is built, so a reader could not tell which layer a page is about. Its pages now sit in swarm/, hives/ and agents/, with the accounts an agent can hold outside the system in external-accounts/. - swarm/: forge, matrix and the knowledge repo join the swarm pages, and so does the swarmctl reference. - hives/: the dashboard, hivectl and its reference, and the operator/agent boundary, with a README that takes over the old web-ui and tools pages. - agents/: the roster, persistence, config changes, the agent's own web page (was web-ui/agent) and the security model, with a README. - external-accounts/: GitHub and GitLab. Pages are moved whole; none is split yet. Every reference follows: relative links in the docs, `docs/2-handbook/...` paths in code comments, the nix checks that regenerate the CLI references and the ignore list, and docs/README.md, whose handbook section is now by layer.
This commit is contained in:
parent
263b21021a
commit
0e84fe8bc4
1 changed files with 393 additions and 363 deletions
109
docs/2-handbook/hives/boundary.md
Normal file
109
docs/2-handbook/hives/boundary.md
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
|
|||
# The operator/agent boundary
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- vale write-good.Passive = NO -->
|
||||
|
||||
Design rationale for hyperhive's two-principal trust model. The
|
||||
_implementation_ work — container network isolation, the unifying
|
||||
gateway, core-daemon privsep — is tracked as `area:ops` issues on
|
||||
the forge.
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- vale write-good.Passive = YES -->
|
||||
|
||||
The operator/agent boundary is technically enforced, not just a
|
||||
convention: containers run in private netns (network isolation is
|
||||
always on), the gateway proxies all operator-facing traffic, and
|
||||
`hive-c0re` runs as the unprivileged `hive-core` user.
|
||||
|
||||
## Two principals, two paths
|
||||
|
||||
- **Operator** — reaches every UI (the dashboard + every
|
||||
per-agent page) through the gateway, on one origin.
|
||||
The core daemon serves operator-authority actions
|
||||
(answer-as-operator, lifecycle POSTs), reachable only via the
|
||||
gateway.
|
||||
- **Agent** — speaks only for itself, only over its per-agent
|
||||
unix socket. The socket's identity _is_ the agent (see
|
||||
`docs/5-project/process/conventions.md`, "identity = socket"). An agent must not
|
||||
be able to reach the core daemon's HTTP surface, another
|
||||
agent's socket, or another agent's web UI.
|
||||
|
||||
## Design rule
|
||||
|
||||
**Operator-authority actions never get a per-agent-socket entry
|
||||
point.** They live in hive-c0re.
|
||||
|
||||
Worked example — destroying or rebuilding a container is a
|
||||
`POST /api/{destroy,rebuild}/{name}` on the core dashboard, _never_ a
|
||||
per-agent-socket `Request` variant. If it were a per-agent-socket
|
||||
request, a compromised agent could `curl` its own socket and destroy
|
||||
or rebuild itself (or, if the variant took an arbitrary target, another
|
||||
agent) without ever touching the core's own authenticated surface.
|
||||
|
||||
## Why network isolation is the load-bearing step
|
||||
|
||||
Without network isolation, containers share the host network namespace
|
||||
and can reach `localhost:<core-port>`, the dashboard, and every other
|
||||
agent's web port — the operator/agent split is on the honour system and
|
||||
every boundary claim above is aspirational. Network isolation is what
|
||||
makes the boundary _real_; the gateway and privsep are ergonomics and
|
||||
defence-in-depth layered on top.
|
||||
|
||||
Network isolation is complete and always on: every agent container
|
||||
runs in a private netns behind the hive bridge, and there is no
|
||||
shared-netns mode. See `docs/4-implementation/networking/network.md`.
|
||||
|
||||
Concretely, the core daemon's dashboard `/api` carries **no
|
||||
application-layer authentication** — the core daemon serves operator-authority
|
||||
routes unauthenticated at the HTTP layer. Their protection is entirely (a) the
|
||||
gateway, which fronts all operator traffic and is where operator auth lives,
|
||||
and (b) network isolation, which keeps agents — and the CI runner's untrusted
|
||||
PR builds — off host-loopback so nothing can reach `127.0.0.1:<dashboard_port>`
|
||||
directly. This is deliberate given the load-bearing role of network isolation
|
||||
above, but it's a standing invariant: the `/api` must never bind to a
|
||||
non-loopback address or get exposed outside the gateway, and every new
|
||||
operator-authority route inherits that assumption. hyperhive treats
|
||||
`swarm-ci-runner` like an agent for this purpose — it runs untrusted PR code and is
|
||||
netns-isolated for the same reason.
|
||||
|
||||
The boundary rests on three layers:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Gateway** — fronts all surfaces (dashboard + every per-agent UI)
|
||||
on one origin. An nginx nixos-container proxies per-agent UIs under
|
||||
`/agent/<name>/`, which is what lets each agent page's inbox panel
|
||||
POST `mark-all-read` to the core dashboard's
|
||||
`/api/agent/{name}/mark-all-read` go same-origin instead of needing
|
||||
a cross-origin CORS shim. Pure ergonomics — no behavioural risk on
|
||||
its own.
|
||||
2. **Network isolation** — the load-bearing layer: every agent
|
||||
container runs in a private netns behind the hive bridge, always
|
||||
on and unconditional. This is what turns the operator/agent split
|
||||
from an honour-system convention into an enforced boundary.
|
||||
3. **Privsep** — defence in depth on the core process; `hive-c0re`
|
||||
runs as the unprivileged `hive-core` user and delegates root
|
||||
operations to `hive-priv`, a narrow socket-activated helper. See
|
||||
[`docs/4-implementation/trust-boundary/hive-c0re-privilege.md`](../../4-implementation/trust-boundary/hive-c0re-privilege.md) for the privilege boundary table.
|
||||
|
||||
### host admin socket access (`hivectl`)
|
||||
|
||||
`hivectl` drives the whole hive — spawn / kill / destroy / rebuild /
|
||||
deploy — over the **host admin socket** `/run/hyperhive/host.sock`,
|
||||
socket-activated by the `hive-c0re.socket` unit. That socket _is_ the
|
||||
full-control surface, so who can connect to it's a real trust
|
||||
boundary.
|
||||
|
||||
By default the socket is `0660` group-owned by **`hive-admin`**, an
|
||||
empty group — so it's effectively **root-only** until an operator is
|
||||
explicitly granted access. Grant sudoless `hivectl` by listing login
|
||||
users in `services.hyperhive.deploy.hive-controller.adminUsers`; the option adds each to
|
||||
`hive-admin`, and members connect without `sudo`. The runtime dir
|
||||
`/run/hyperhive` is `0751` (traverse-only, no listing) so the group can
|
||||
reach the socket path; the socket's own `0660 hive-admin` mode gates
|
||||
the connection, and the per-agent subdirs under it keep their own
|
||||
restrictive perms. Keep `adminUsers` to trusted operators — membership
|
||||
is equivalent to root over the hive.
|
||||
|
||||
## Implementation detail
|
||||
|
||||
How `hive-priv` is socket-activated and how the per-agent socket directory
|
||||
gets its owner and mode:
|
||||
[socket mechanics](../../4-implementation/trust-boundary/boundary-mechanism.md).
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue